Skip to main content
Log in

Turning Good Ideas into Bad News: The Effect of Negative and Positive Sponsorship Information on Sponsors’ Brand Image

  • Sponsorship Information and Brand Image
  • Published:
Schmalenbach Business Review Aims and scope

Abstract

Through sponsorships, companies primarily expect to establish, strengthen, or change their brand image. We analyze the effects of negative and positive sponsorship information on the favorability and structure of sponsors’ brand images. We adopt a new, unconventional approach, the Brand Concept Map, which analyzes sponsors’ brand associative networks. We find that negative sponsorship information unfavorably influences the favorability of sponsors’ brand image and the structure of a sponsoring brand’s associative network, but positive sponsorship stimuli have no influence. Furthermore, we identify boundary conditions under which the effect of negative sponsorship information on sponsors’ brand image is strengthened or diminished.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David. A. (1991), Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, David A. (1996), Building strong brands, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, Leona S. and Stephen G. West (1991), Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, Joseph W., J. Wesley Hutchinson, and John G. Lynch Jr. (1991), Memory and decision making, in Thomas S. Robertson and Harlold H. Kassarijian, (eds.): Handbook of consumer behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, Punam, Morris B. Holbrook, and Debra Stephens (1988), The formation of affective judgments: The cognitive-affective model versus the independence hypothesis, Journal of Consumer Research 15, 386–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John R. (1976), Language, memory, and thought, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John R. (1983a), A spreading activation theory of memory, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22, 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John R. (1983b), The Architecture of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Ainsworth A. (2007), Public information and consumer skepticism effects on celebrity endorsements: Studies among young consumers, Journal of Marketing Communications 13, 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettmann, James R. (1979), An information processing theory of consumer choice, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, James R. and Mila Sujan (1987), Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers, Journal of Consumer Research 14, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillat, Francois A., Barbara A. Lafferty, and Eric G. Harris (2005), Investigating sponsorship effectiveness: Do less familiar brands have an advantage over more familiar brands in single and multiple sponsorship arrangements?, Journal of Brand Management 13, 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Alan M. and Elizabeth F. Loftus (1975), A spreading activation theory of semantic processing, Psychological Review 87, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, Bettina T., Donald P. Roy, and Edward A. Steinard II (2001), Exploring managers’ perceptions of the impact of sponsorship on brand equity, Journal of Advertising 30, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, Martin G. (1991), Prioritising the sponsorship audience, European Journal of Marketing, 25, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Astous, Alain and Pierre Bitz (1995), Consumer evaluations of sponsorship programmes, European Journal of Marketing 29, 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalakas, Vassilis and Aron M. Levin (2005), The balance theory domino: How sponsorships may elicit negative consumer attitudes, Advances in Consumer Research 32, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Dwane H. (1999), Brand Endorsement, popularity, and event sponsorship as advertising cues affecting consumer pre-purchase attitudes, Journal of Advertising 28, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, Russell H. (1986), How do attitudes guide behavior?, in Richard M. Sorrentino and E. Tory Higgins (eds.): The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, New York: Guilford Press, 204–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, Martin and Icek Ajzen (1975), Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohs, Reinhard, Udo Wagner, and Sabine Vsetecka (2004), Assessing the effectiveness of sport sponsorships — An empirical examination, Schmalenbach Business Review 56, 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, Kevin (1997), A model of image creation and image transfer in event sponsorship, International Marketing Review 28, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, Fritz (1958), The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IEG (2009), Turning good ideas into bad news: The effect of positive and negative sponsee performance on sponsors’ brand image, IEG Press Release, December, No. 24, http://www.marketingpower.com/ResourceLibrary/Documents/Content%20Partner%20Documents/IEG/2010/sponsorship_spending_recedes_for_first_time.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Javalgi, Rajshekhar G., Mark B. Traylor, Andrew C. Gross, and Edward Lampman (1994), Awareness of sponsorship and corporate image: An empirical investigation, Journal of Advertising, 23, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, Deborah R., Barbara Loken, Kyeongheui Kim, and Alokparna B. Monga, (2006), Brand concept maps: A methodology for identifying brand association networks, Journal of Marketing Research 43, 549–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, Christopher (1998), Concept mapping in marketing: A research tool for uncovering consumers’ knowledge structure associations, Advances in Consumer Research 25, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Kevin L. (1993), Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Kevin L. and David A. Aaker (1992), The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions, Journal of Marketing Research 29, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Harold H. (1973), The process of casual attribution, American Psychologist 28, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, H. S. (1996), Characteristics of memory associations: A consumer-based brand equity perspective, International Journal of Research in Marketing 13, 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meenaghan, Tony (2001), Understanding sponsorship effects, Psychology & Marketing 18, 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George A. (1956), The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, The Psychological Review 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, Banwari (1995), A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement, Psychology & Marketing 12, 663–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, R. Bruce, Terence. A. Shimp, and Tomoaki Sakano (2006), Celebrity endorsements in Japan and the United States: Is negative information all that harmful?, Journal of Advertising Research 46, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, Joseph D. and D. Bob Gowin (1984), Learning how to learn, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, Charles E., George J. Suci, and Percy H. Tannenbaum (1957), The measurement of meaning, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and David Schumann (1983), Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement, Journal of Consumer Research 10, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M. Tuan (1992), Effects of involvement, arousal and pleasure on the recognition of sponsorship stimuli, Advances in Consumer Research 19, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon, Derek T. Y. and Gerard Prendergast (2006), A new framework for evaluating sponsorship opportunities, International Journal of Advertising 25, 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, Nigel, Kevin E. Voges, and Mark Brown (2009), Winning ways — Immediate and long-term-effects of sponsorship on perceptions of brand quality and corporate image, Journal of Advertising 38, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quester, Pascale G. and Beverley Thompson (2001), Advertising and promotion leverage on arts sponsorship effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research 41, 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, Lynne M. and John R. Anderson (1980), A partial solution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge, Cognitive Psychology 12, 447–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifon, Nora J., Sejung M. Choi, Carrie S. Trimble, and Hairong Li (2004), Congruence effects in sponsorship — The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive, Journal of Advertising 33, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Carolyn J. and Karen L. Becker-Olsen (2006), Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships, Journal of Marketing 70, 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, Bernard L. and Julie A. Ruth (1998), Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitude, Journal of Marketing Research 35, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, Richard and Peter Thompson (2000), Determinants of sports sponsorship response, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28, 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichert, Thorsten and Katja Schöntag (2010), Exploring consumer knowledge structures using associative network analysis, Psychology & Marketing 27, 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Wall Street Journal-Eastern Edition (2007). Deutsche Telekom exits as cycling sponsor amid scandal, Vol. 250, No. 126, B3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, Brian D. and Terence A. Shimp (1998), Endorsers in advertising: The case of negative celebrity information, Journal of Advertising, 27, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Votolato, Nicole L. and H. Rao Unnava (2006), Spillover of negative information on brand alliances, Journal of Consumer Psychology 16, 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, Robert B. (1968), Attitudinal effects of mere exposure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Schnittka PhD.

Additional information

The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript. The authors also thank Ann-Christin Wilcke for their help in collecting the data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schnittka, O., Sattler, H. & Farsky, M. Turning Good Ideas into Bad News: The Effect of Negative and Positive Sponsorship Information on Sponsors’ Brand Image. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 65, 227–247 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396856

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396856

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Navigation