Abstract
The assessment of skeletal status has wide clinical applications, especially in the management of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis, once thought of as an unpreventable and untreatable aging process, has revealed many of its secrets over the last decade, and the advent of successful drug therapy has changed our perception of the disease. Non-invasive techniques play a fundamental role in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and in the assessment of the efficacy of drug treatments. The primary technique used in osteoporosis is dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), that has been established as a reliable means of measuring bone density. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), because of the relative portability of the equipment, ease of use, lack of ionizing radiation and low cost, has great potential for widespread use. Five devices for QUS assessment have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and many more applications are in progress. QUS is a relatively new technology, at least in its application to bone fragility. Nevertheless, QUS has demonstrated that it is able to detect bone fragility as well as DXA. However, diagnosis of osteoporosis by QUS remains contentious, but the problems are due more to the limitations of the present T-scores rather than to the technique. A better option for QUS would be to report results in terms of remaining lifetime fracture risk, keeping in mind that a risk estimate needs not only the QUS or DXA measurement, but also the specific data, such as age, weight, gender, hormonal status and fracture history of the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous. Consensus Development Conference on Osteoporosis: Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med. 1993, 95: 5 (A).
Wu C., Gluer C.C., Lu Y., Hans D., Genant H.K. Ultrasound characterization of bone demineralization. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1998, 62: 133–139.
Njeh C.F., Fuerst T., Diessel E., Genant H.K. Is quantitative ultrasound dependent on bone structure? A reflection. Osteoporos. Int. 2001, 12: 1–15.
Gluer C.C., Wu C.Y., Genant H.K. Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: an in-vitro study. Osteoporos. Int. 1993, 3: 185–191.
Hans D., Arlot M.E., Schott A.M., Roux J.P., Kotzki P.O., Meunier P.J. Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass? A two-dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 1995, 16: 295–300.
Nicholson P., Muller R., Lowet G. et al. Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 1998, 23: 425–431.
Hans D., Wu C., Njeh C.F., et al. Ultrasound velocity of trabecolar cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1999, 64: 18–23.
Van den Bergh J.P.W., Lenthe G.H., Hermus A.R.M.M., Corstens F.H.M., Smals A.G.H., Huiskes R. Speed of sound reflects Young’s modulus as assessed by microstructural finite element analysis. Bone 2000, 26: 519–524.
De Terlizzi F., Battista S., Cavani F., Canè V., Cadossi R. Influence of bone tissue density and elasticity on ultrasound propagation: an in vitro study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000, 15: 2458–2466.
Wu C., Hans D., He Y., et al. Prediction of bone strength of distal forearm using radius bone mineral density and phalangeal speed of sound. Bone 2000, 26: 529–533.
Greenspan S.L., Bouxein M.L., Melton M.E., et al. Precision and discriminatory ability of calcaneal bone assessment technologies. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1997, 12: 1303–1313.
Pluskiewicz W., Drozdowska B. Ultrasound measurements at the calcaneus in men: differences between healthy and fractured persons and the influence of age and anthropometric features on ultrasound parameters. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 10: 47–51.
Frost M.L., Blake G.M., Fogelman I. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 10: 441–449.
Sahota O., San P., Cawte S.A., Pearson D., Hosking D.J. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: the fouryear effects of hormone replacement therapy. Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11: 52–58.
Gonnelli S., Cepollaro C., Pondrelli C., Martini, Rossi B., Gennari C. Ultrasound parameters in osteoporotic patients treated with salmon calcitonin: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos. Int. 1996, 6: 303–307.
Lu Y., Gluer C.C. Statistical tools in quantitative ultrasound applications. In: Njeh C.F., Hans D., Fuerst T., Gluer C.C., Genant H.K. (Eds.), Quantitative ultrasound. Assessment of osteoporosis and bone status. Martin Dunitz Ltd., London 1999, pp. 77–100.
Chappard C., Camus E., Lefebvre F., et al. Evaluation of error bounds on calcaneal speed of sound caused by surrounding soft tissue. J. Clin. Densitom. 2000, 3: 121–131.
Chappard C., Berger G., Roux C., Laugier P. Ultrasound measurement on the calcaneus: influence of immersion time and rotation of the foot. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 9: 318–326.
Iki M., Kajita E., Mitamura S., Nishino H., Yamagami T., Nagahama N. Precision of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the heel bone and effects of ambient temperature on the parameters. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 10: 462–467.
Gonnelli S., Cepollaro C., Agnusdei D., Palmieri R., Rossi S., Gennari C. Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos. Int. 1995, 5: 413–418.
Gluer C.C., for the International Quantitative Ultrasound Consensus Group. Quantitative ultrasound technique for the assessment of osteoporosis: expert agreement on current status. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1997, 12: 1280–1288.
Gluer C.C., Hans D. How to use ultrasound for risk assessment: a need for defining strategies. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 9: 193–195.
Cepollaro C., Agnusdei D., Gonnelli S., Martini S., Borracelli D., Palmieri R., et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of bone in normal Italian males and females. BJR 1995, 68: 910–914.
Landin-Wilhelmsen K., Johansson S., Rosengren A., et al. Calcaneal ultrasound measurements are determined by age and physical activity. Studies in two Swedish random population samples. J. Intern. Med. 2000, 247: 269–278.
Wuster C., Albanese C., De Aloysio D., et al., and the Phalangeal Osteosonogrammetry Study Group. Phalangeal osteosonogrammometry study: age-related changes, diagnostic sensitivity, and discrimination power. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000, 15: 1603–1614.
Montagnani A., Gonnelli S., Cepollaro C., et al. Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanxes in healthy Italian men. Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11: 499–504.
Weiss M., Ben-Shlomo A., Ish-Shalom S. Discrimination of proximal hip fracture by quantitative ultrasound measurement at the radius. Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11: 411–416.
Lappe J.M., Stegman M.R., Davies K.M., Barber S., Recker R.R. A prospective study of quantitative ultrasound in children and adolescents. J. Clin. Densitom. 2000, 3: 167–175.
Howard G.M., Nguyen T.V., Harris M., Kelly P.J., Eisman J.A. Genetic and environmental contributions to the association between quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density measurements: a twin study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998, 8: 1318–1327.
Danielson M.E., Cauley J.A., Baker C.E., et al. Familial resemblance of bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal ultrasound attenuation: the BMD in mothers and daughters study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14: 102–110.
Gregg E.W., Kriska A.M., Salamone L.M., et al. Correlates of quantitative ultrasound in the women’s healthy lifestyle project. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 10: 416–424.
Jakes R.W., Khaw K.T., Day N.E., et al. Patterns of physical activity and ultrasound attenuation by heel bone among Norfolk cohort of European Perspective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC Norfolk): population based study. B.M.J. 2001, 322: 140–143.
Hans D., Dargent-Molina P., Schott A.M., et al., for the EPIDOS Prospective Study Group. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996, 348: 511–514.
Bauer D.C., Gluer C.C., Cauley J.A., et al., for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch. Intern. Med. 1997, 157: 629–634.
Cepollaro C., Gonnelli S., Pondrelli C., et al. The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture. Br. J. Radiol. 1997, 70: 691–696.
Dargent-Molina P., Schott A.M., Hans D., et al., for the EPIDOS study. Separate and combined value of bone mass and gait speed measurements in screening for hip fracture risk: results from the EPIDOS study. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 9: 188–192.
Gnudi S., Ripamonti C., Malavolta N. Quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry to evaluate the risk of nonspine fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11: 518–523.
Hans D., Srivastav S.K., Singal C., et al. Does combining the results from multiple bone sites measured by a new quantitative ultrasound device improve discrimination of hip fracture? J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14: 644–651.
Karlsson M.K., Duan Y., Ahlborg H., Obrant K.J., Johnell O., Seeman E. Age, gender, and fragility are associated with differences in quantitative ultrasound independent of bone mineral density. Bone 2001, 28: 118–122.
Mauloni M., Rovati L.C., Cadossi R., De Terlizzi F., Ventura V., De Aloysio D. Monitoring bone effect of transdermal hormone replacement therapy by ultrasound investigation at the phalanx: a four-year follow-up study. Menopause 2000, 7: 402–412.
Balikian P., Burbank K., Houde J., et al. Bone mineral density and broadband ultrasound attenuation with estrogen treatment of postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Densitom. 1998, 1: 19–26.
Gonnelli S., Cepollaro C., Pondrelli C., et al. Ultrasonography is able to detect longitudinal changes induced by alendronate. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14: S139 (Abstract).
Krieg M.A., Jacquet A.F., Bremgartner M., Cuttelod S., Thieband D., Burckhardt P. Effect of supplementation with vitamin D3 and calcium on quantitative ultrasound of bone in elderly instituzionalized women: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 9: 483–488.
Blanckaert F., Cortet B., Coquerelle P., et al. Contribution of calcaneal ultrasonic assessment to the evaluation of postmenopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Rev. Rheum. 1997, 64: 305–313.
Njeh C.F., Boivin C.M., Gough A., et al. Evaluation of finger ultrasound in the assessment of bone status with application of rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporos. Int. 1999, 9: 82–90.
Luisetto G., Camozzi V., De Terlizzi F. Use of quantitative ultrasonography in differentiating osteomalacia from osteoporosis: preliminary study. J. Ultrasound Med. 2000, 19: 251–256.
Gonnelli S., Montagnani A., Cepollaro C., et al. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after surgical treatment. Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11: 255–260.
Montagnani A., Gonnelli S., Cepollaro C., et al. Quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of skeletal status in uremic patients. J. Clin. Densitom. 1999, 2: 389–395.
Cepollaro C., Gonnelli S., Pondrelli C., et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta: bone turnover, bone density and ultrasound parameters. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1999, 65: 129–132.
Cepollaro C., Gonnelli S., Pondrelli C., et al. Usefulness of ultrasound in Sudeck’s atrophy of the foot. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1998, 62: 538–541.
Hadji P., Hars O., Sturm G., Bauer T., Emons G., Schulz K.D. The effect of long-term, non suppressive levothyroxine treatment on quantitative ultrasonometry of bone in women. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2000, 142: 445–450.
Cortet B., Cortet C., Blanckaert F., et al. Quantitative ultrasound of bone and markers of bone turnover in Cushing’s syndrome. Osteoporos. Int. 2001, 12: 117–123.
Cepollaro C., Gonnelli S., Bruni D., et al. Dual x-ray absorptiometry and bone ultrasonography in patients with Rett syndrome. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2001, 69: 259–262.
Van den Bergh J.P.W., Hermus A.R.M.M., Spruyt A.I., Sweep C.G.J., Corstens F.H.M., Smals A.G.H. Bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound parameters in patients with Klinefelter’s syndrome after long-term testosterone substitution. Osteoporos. Int. 2001, 12: 55–62.
Phillipov G., Holsman M., Phillips P. The clinical role of quantitative ultrasound in assessing fracture risk and bone status. M.J.A. 2000, 173: 208–211.
Pocock N.A., Culton N.L., Gilbert G.R., et al. Potential roles for quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis. M.J.A. 2000, 173: 355–358.
Frost M.L., Blake G.M., Fogelman I. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos. Int. 2000, 11: 321–330.
Frost M.L., Balke G.M., Fogelman I. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2001, 16: 406–416.
Nairus N., Ahmadi S., Baker S., Baran D. Quantitative ultrasound: an indicator of osteoporosis in perimenopausal women. J. Clin. Densitom. 2000, 3: 141–147.
Lippuner K., Fuchs G., Ruetsche A.G., Perrelet R., Casez J.P., Neto I. How well do radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound predict osteoporosis at spine or hip? J. Clin. Densitom. 2000, 3: 241–249.
Stewart A., Reid D.M. Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors — which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis? Br. J. Radiol. 2000, 73: 165–171.
Langton C.M., Ballard P.A., Langton D.K., Purdie D.W. Maximising the cost effectiveness of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective population prescreen. Technol. Health Care 1997, 5: 235–241.
Ayers M., Prince M., Ahmadi S., Baran D.T. Reconciling quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus with x-ray based measurements of the central skeleton. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000, 15: 1850–1855.
Miller P.D., Bonnick S.L., Johnston C.C. Jr., et al. The challenges of peripheral bone density testing: which patients need additional central density skeletal measurements. J. Clin. Densitom. 1998, 1: 211–217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonnelli, S., Cepollaro, C. The use of ultrasound in the assessment of bone status. J Endocrinol Invest 25, 389–397 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03344023
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03344023