Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosomal interchanges in plants

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The foregoing survey of the literature shows that translocations are of wide-spread occurrence in plants. Most of them have been found in the angiosperms: in 49 genera of dicots and 47 genera of monocots; but some have been reported in the gymnosperms (in two genera), also in the fungi. Studies at meiosis will undoubtedly reveal translocations in many other species, either in occasional plants or in different groups isolated geographically. In certain cases they seem to have played a part in the evolution of present karyotypes. In a number of cases, the presence of translocations has not been definitely established, but they are one possible explanation of the observed configurations.

The survey reveals the need for additional detailed studies of interchanges. What accounts for directed segregation in the interchange rings in certain species? For each of the factors which has been suggested there is one or more species which does not behave in the predicted manner. Experimentally produced interchanges in other species having these features would be useful; also in species having directed segregation of the sex chromosomes. A discussion of how they have been and how they might be used as tools in the investigation of other cytological and cytogenetic problems and also certain applications to practical breeding have been included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Afify, A. 1933. Chromosome form and behaviour in diploid and triploidAconitum. Jour. Genet.27: 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. Some evolutionary aspects of a comparative cytogenetic investigation betweenAconitum andSolanum. Genetica18: 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akdik, S., andA. Müntzing. 1949. New cases of segmental interchange and some other meiotic irregularities in rye. Hereditas35: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akemine, T. 1937. Non-disjunction of the meiotic chromosomes inRhoeo discolor Hance. Jap. Jour. Genet.13: 31–36. [Eng. sum.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947. Behavior of chromosome rings in meiosis (a note). Jap. Jour. Genet.22: 5. [In Japanese].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. E. 1953. Microsporogenesis in maize monoploids. Abstracts Amer. Soc. Agron. Annual Meetings. p. 78.

  • Anderson, E., andK. Sax. 1936. A cytological monograph of the American species ofTradescantia. Bot. Gaz.97: 433–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. G. 1934. A chromosomal interchange in maize involving the attachment to the nucleolus. Amer. Nat.68: 345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935. Chromosomal interchanges in maize. Genetics20: 70–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. Induced chromosomal alterations in maize. p. 1297–1310.In: Biological effects of radiation. Ed. by B. M. Duggar. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938. Translocations in maize involving chromosome 9. Genetics23: 307–313.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Translocations in maize involving chromosome 8. Genetics24: 385–390.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. Translocations in maize involving the short arm of chromosome 1. Genetics26: 452–459.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1943. Utilization of translocations with endosperm markers in the study of economic traits. Use of translocations in corn breeding. Maize Genet. Coop. News Let.17: 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1952. A chromosomal technique used in biochemical studies on the developing endosperm of maize. Agron. Jour.44: 560–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andR. A. Brink. 1940. Translocations in maize involving chromosome 3. Genetics25: 299–309.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andI. W. Clokey. 1934. Chromosomes involved in a series of interchanges in maize. Amer. Nat.68: 440–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andH. H. Kramer. 1954. Translocations in maize involving chromosome 10. Genetics39: 506–512.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————, —————, andA. E. Longley. 1955a. Translocations in maize involving chromosome 4. Genetics40: 500–510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————, ————— and —————. 1955b. Translocations in maize involving chomosome 6. Genetics40: 531–538.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andK. L. Retherford. 1949. Hereditary effects produced in maize by radiations from the Bikini atomic bomb. I. Studies on seedlings and pollen of the exposed genertion. Genetics34: 639–646.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andL. F. Randolph. 1945. Location of the centromeres on the linkage maps of maize. Genetics30: 518–526.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arenkova, D. N. 1939. Types of gametes produced by structural aberrants inCrepis capillaris Wallr. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS25: 423–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, C. 1951. Problems in chemical mutagenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.16: 199–213.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, P. 1930. Cytological studies of five interspecific hybrids ofCrepis leontodontoides. Univ. Calif., Publ. Agr. Sci.6: 135–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, E. B. 1942. Systematics, cytogenetics and evolution inCrepis. Bot. Rev.8: 139–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. W. 1951. Localized chiasmata in the differentiated chromosomes of the tomato. Genetics36: 374–381.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. Comparative effects of X-ray and ultraviolet radiation on the differentiated chromosomes of the tomato. Cytologia19: 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia, E. 1953. Esiste un tipo chromosomico con “centromero inNerine undulata Herb? Caryologia5: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, G. W. 1932a. The relation of crossing over to chromosome association inZea-Euchlaena hybrids. Genetics17: 481–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932b. A possible influence of the spindle fibre on crossing over inDrosophila. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 160–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Studies of crossing-over in heterozygous translocations inDrosophila melanogaster. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.65: 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. Chromosome aberration and gene mutation in sticky chromosome plants ofZea mays. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 43–56.

  • Belling, J. 1914a. A study of semisterility. Jour. Hered.5: 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1914b. The mode of inheritance of semisterility in the offspring of certain hybrid plants. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.12: 303–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1915a. Report of the assistant botanist: Inheritance of partial sterility. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Rep.1914: 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1915b. Linkage and semisterility. Amer. Nat.49: 582–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1925. A unique result in certain species crosses. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.39: 286–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. The attachments of chromosomes at the reduction division in flowering plants. Jour. Genet.18: 177–205.

  • —————. 1928. A working hypothesis for segmental interchange between homologous chromosomes in flowering plants. Univ. Calif., Publ. Bot.14: 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. F. Blakeslee. 1924. The configurations and sizes of the chromosomes in the trivalents of 25-chromosome Daturas. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.10: 116–120.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1926. On the attachment of non-homologous chromosomes at the reducation division in certain 25-chromosome Daturas. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.12: 7–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, A. D. 1939. Chromosome association inDatura. Proc. VII Int. Genet. Congr.: 63–64.

  • ————— andA. G. Avery. 1941. Distribution of prime types in nine species ofDatura. Genetics26: 138 [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1943a. Geographical distribution of chromosomal types inDatura metel. Amer. Jour. Bot.30: 222–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1943b. Chromosomal interchange among six species ofDatura in nature. Amer. Jour. Bot.30: 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1944. Chromosome associations in tetraploid hybrids between prime type 1 and prime type 2 inDatura stramonium. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.30: 302–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. F. Blakeslee. 1932. Cytology of theferox-quercifoliastramonium triangle inDatura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 151–159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1934. Cytology of a translocation of the 1–2 chromosome inDatura. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club61: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1935. Chromosome ends inDatura discolor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.21: 369–374.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1943. Chromosome ends inDatura pruinosa. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.29: 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. F. Blakeslee. 1933. Prime types inDatura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 103–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, P. N. 1941. Cytological studies in the genusGaura. Ann. Bot., n.s.5: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942a. Cytological analysis of structural hybridity inRhoeo discolor Hance. Jour. Genet.44: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942b. Further cytogenetical investigations in the genusGaura. Ann. Bot., n.s.6: 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F. 1927a. The chromosomal constitution of Nubbin, a compound (2n + 1) type inDatura. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.13: 79–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1927b. Nubbin, a compound chromosomal type inDatura. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.30: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1927c. Annual Report of the Director, Dept. of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Yearbook26: for 1926–1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1928. The genetics ofDatura. Verh. V. Int. Kongr. Vererbungswiss. 1927. Supplement I. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb. 1928. p. 117–130.

  • —————. 1931. Extra chromosomes, a source of variations in the Jimson weed. Smithsonian Report (1930) Pub. 3096: 431–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. Chromosomal interchanges. p. 37–46.In: Cytology, Genetics and Evolution. Univ. Penn. Bicent. Conf. Univ. of Pa. Press, Phila.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. G. Avery. 1938. Fifteen-year breeding records of 2n + 1 types ofDatura Stramonium. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 501: 315–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, ————— andA. D. Bergner. 1940. Genes associated with prime types inDatura and their possible relation to the hypothesis of position effect. Genetics25: 111. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • -----,A. D. Bergner andA. G. Avery. 1937. Geographical distribution of chromosomal prime types inDatura stramonium. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 1070–1093.

  • Blanco, J. L. 1948. Anormalidades meioticas en relation con la consanguinidad en “Zea Mays” L. Cons. Invest. Cient. Mision Biologica de Galicia, Madrid: 9–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Pollen size and quantitative inheritance in maize. Genetics35: 654–655. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Blixt, S. 1955. Cytological investigation of line No. 21 ofPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.13: 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borojevic, S. 1954. [A cytogenetic study of deficiency-duplications in translocations involving chromosomes 5 and 7 in maize]. Poljopriveredna Znanstvena Smotra15: 51–74. [Eng. Sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C.B. 1923. The translocation of a section of chromosome II upon chromosome III inDrosophila. Anat. Rec.24: 426–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andJ. Schultz. 1934. Constitution of the germinal material, p. 278. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Yearbook33: 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. Demonstrations (1) of the first translocations inDrosophila melanogaster and (2) of normal repeats in chromosomes. Amer. Nat.70: 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----- andK. S. Brehme. 1944. The mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 552.

  • Brink, R. A. 1927. The occurrence of semisterility in maize. Jour. Hered.18: 266–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Are the chromosomes aggregates of groups of physiologically interdependent genes? Amer. Nat.66: 444–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935. Cytogenetic evolutionary processes in plants. Amer. Nat.69: 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. Very light variegated pericarp in maize. Genetics39: 724–740.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andC. R. Burnham. 1929. Inheritance of semisterility in maize. Amer. Nat.63: 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andD. C. Cooper. 1931. The association of semisterile-1 in maize with two linkage groups. Genetics16: 595–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1932a. A structural change in the chromosomes of maize leading to chain formation. Amer. Nat.66: 310–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1932b. A strain of maize homozygous for segmental interchanges involving both ends of the P-br chromosome. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 441–447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1932c. Chromosome rings in maize andOenothera. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 447–455.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1935. A proof that crossing over involves an exchange of segments between homologous chromosomes. Genetics20: 22–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Meta S. 1940. The relation between chiasma formation and disjunction. Univ. Texas, Publ. 4032: 11–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Cotton from Bikini. Jour. Hered.41: 115–121.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andM. Y. Menzel. 1950. New trispecies hybrids in cotton. Jour. Hered.41: 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. W. 1949. The structure and meiotic behavior of the differentiated chromosomes of tomato. Genetics34: 437–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunn, H. G. 1930. On chromosome fragmentation inPrimula. V Int. Bot. Cong., Cambridge, 1930. Rep. Proc.: 243–246.

  • Burkart, A. 1931. Investigaciones geneticas sobre una nueva mutacion deDrosophila melanogaster determinante de excepciones hereditarias. Rev. Fac. Agron. La Plata2: 393–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, C. R. 1930. Genetical and cytological studies of semisterility and related phenomena in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16: 269–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932a. An interchange in maize giving low sterility and chain configurations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 434–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932b. The association of non-homologous parts in a chromosomal interchange in maize. Proc. VI. Int. Congr. Genet. Vol. 2: 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934a. Cytology and genetics of an interchange between chromosomes 8 and 9 in maize. Genetics19: 430–447.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934b. Chromosomal interchanges in maize: Reduction of crossingover and the association of non-homologous parts. Amer. Nat.68: 81–82. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934c. Linkage relations of certain factors and their serial order in chromosome 5 in maize. Amer. Nat.68: 82. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1945. Chromosome disjunction in maize interchanges. Genetics30: 2. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1946. An “Oenothera” or multiple translocation method of establishing homozygous lines. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.38: 702–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948a. Cytogenetic studies of a translocation between chromosomes 1 and 7 in maize. Genetics33: 5–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948b. Chromosome segregation in translocations involving chromosome 6 in maize. Genetics33: 605. [Abstr.]

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1949. Chromosome segregation in maize translocations in relation to crossing over in interstitial segments. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.35: 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1949b. Crossing over differences in micro- and megasporogenesis in corn. Amer. Soc. Agron. Meetings. Abstr. p. 2.

  • —————. 1950a. Chromosome segregations in chain-forming translocations in maize. Genetics35: 99. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950b. Chromosome segregation in translocations involving chromosome 6 in maize. Genetics35: 446–481.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950c. Crossing over in an inversion heterozygote. Genetics35: 659. [Abstract].

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1953. Studies of crossing over and chromosome segregation in maize translocations. Proc. IX Int. Congr. Genet. Bellagio, Suppl., Vol. VI., Caryologia. p. 1171. [Abstr.]

  • -----. 1955. The use of chromosomal interchanges to check the independence of linkage groups established genetically. [In manuscript].

  • ————— andCartledge, J. L. 1939. Linkage relations between smut resistance and semisterility in maize. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.31: 924–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----,F. H. White andR. Livers. 1953. Chromsome translocations in barley. Proc. IX Int. Congr. Genet., Bellagio, Suppl. Vol. VI, Caryologia. p. 1251. [Abstr.]

  • —————, ————— and —————. 1954. Chromosomal interchanges in barley. Cytologia19: 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadman, C. H. 1943. Nature of tetraploidy in cultivated European potatoes. Nature152: 103–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldecott, R. S., E. F. Frolik andRoslaind Morris. 1952. A comparison of the effects of X-rays and thermal neutrons on dormant seeds of barley. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.38: 804–809.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andL. Smith. 1952. A study of X-ray induced chromosomal aberrations in barley. Cytologia17: 224–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara, A. 1945. Estudo citologica deTriticum sphaerococcum Perc. Agron. Lusitana7: 291–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andL. A. Coutinho. 1939. Citologia dos trigos tetraploides. Agron. Lusitana1: 268–314. [Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andC. Rodrigues. 1946. Contribuicao para o estudo citologica dos espeltoides do tipo γ. Agron. Lusitana8: 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. R. 1952. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. XXIV. Intraspecific differences in chromosome structure. Genetics37: 288–296.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caroli, G., andS. Blixt. 1954. Cytological verification of the genanalytically proved interchange between the chromosomes III and V. ofPisum. Agr. Hort. Genet.12: 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1955. A cytological investigation for verifying the genanalytical results regarding line No. 680 ofPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.13: 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catcheside, D. G. 1939. A position effect inOneothera. Jour. Genet.38: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947. The P-locus position effect inOenothera. Jour. Genet.48: 31–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. The genetics of brevistylis inOenothera. Heredity8: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. S., andM. V. Bradley. 1943. Alteration of chromosome number inMiersia chilensis. Amer. Jour. Bot.30: 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celarier, R. P. 1955. Cytology of the Tradescantieae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club82: 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravorti, A. K. 1951. Origin of cultivated bananas of South East Asia. Indian Jour. Genet. & Plant Breed.11: 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., andE. G. Anderson. 1935. A chromosomal interchange in maize without ring formation. Amer. Jour. Bot.22: 711–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, F. J. 1942. Cytological and genetic studies of sterility in inbred and hybrid maize. Conn. State Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 465: 703–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J. 1931a. Genetic studies inPolemonium. III. Preliminary account of the cytology of species and specific hybrids. Hereditas15: 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931b. Cyto-genetic and taxonomic investigations on melanium violets. Hereditas15: 219–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951. Stages in the evolution of plant species. 206 pp. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, R. E. 1931. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. XII. Transmission features of carmine coral variegation. Zeits. Züchter17: 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andD. R. Cameron. 1944. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. XVIII. Monosomic analysis. Genetics29: 446–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, R. E. 1922. The reduction divisions in the pollen mother cells ofOenothera franciscana. Amer. Jour. Bot.9: 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1929. Meiosis in the pollen mother cells of the Oenotheras, and its probable bearing upon certain genetical problems. Proc. Int. Congr. Plant Sci., Ithaca, Vol. 1: 317–331. [Presented 1926].

  • —————. 1936. Some aspects of the cytogenetics ofOenothera. Bot. Rev.2: 316–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940. Analysis of wild American races ofOenothera (Onagra). Genetics25: 636–644.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950a. Studies inOenothera cytogenetics and phylogeny. I. Introduction and general summary. Ind. Univ. Publ., Sci. Ser.16: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950b. The origin ofNeo-acuens. Ind. Univ. Publ., Sci. Ser.16: 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. F. Blakeslee. 1930. Interaction between complexes as evidence of segmental interchange inOenothera. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16: 183–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1931. Segmental interchange, the basis of chromosomal attachments inOenothera. Cytologia2: 175–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andB. L. Hammond. 1950. An analysis of segmental arrangements in certain races ofOenothera. Ind. Univ. Publ., Sci. Ser.16: 10–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andL. H. Geckler. 1950. The nature and relationship of taxonomic entities in the North American Euoenotheras. Ind. Univ. Publ. Sci. Ser.16: 218–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, L. C. 1941. The relation of chromocenters to the differential segments inRhoeo discolor Hance. Amer. Jour. Bot.28: 742–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. C., andR. A. Brink. 1931. Cytological evidence for segmental interchange between non-homologous chromosomes in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.17: 334–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1937. Chromosome homology in races of maize from different geographical regions. Amer. Nat.71: 582–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, H. B. 1934. Three cases of deficiency in chromosome 9 ofZea mays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.20: 111–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andBarbara McClintock. 1931. A correlation of cytological and genetical crossing-over inZea mays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.17: 492–497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouse, H. V. 1943. Translocations inSciara. Their bearing on chromosome behavior and sex determination. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull.379: 1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cua, Luong D. 1952. Artificial polyploidy in theOryzeae. III. Cytogenetical studies on intra- and inter-subspecies tetraploid hybrids inOryza sativa L. Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res. (Seiken Ziho)5: 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cugnac, A. de, etM. Simonet. 1953. Étude cytogénètique de quelques hybrides intergénèriques d’Agropyrum: Agroelymus, Agrohordeum etAgrotriticum. Ann. Inst. Nat. Rech. Agron. B. Amelior. Plantes4: 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Jean. 1948. Chromosome end arrangements inDatura ceratocaula. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 444–454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dark, S. O. S. 1936. Meiosis in diploid and tetraploidPaeonia species. Jour. Genet.32: 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. Chromosome behavior and structural hybridity in theTradescantiae. Jour. Genet.21: 207–286.

  • —————. 1929b. Ring-formation inOenothera and other genera. Jour. Genet.20: 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931a. The cytological theory of inheritance inOenothera. Jour. Genet.24: 405–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931b. Meiosis. Biol. Rev.6: 221–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. The behavior of interchange heterozygotes inOenothera. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. The origin and behavior of chiasmata. VIII.Secale cereale. Cytologia4: 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. The limitation of crossing-over inOenothera. Jour. Genet.32: 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Recent advances in cytology. (2nd Ed.) 671 pp. P. Blakiston’s Son & Co., Phila., Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. The evolution of genetic systems. 151 pp. Cambridge, Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andGairdner, A. E. 1937. The variation system inCampanula. Jour. Genet.35: 97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andL. La Cour. 1940. The causal sequence of meiosis. III. The effect of hybridity on male and female cells inLilium. Jour. Genet.41: 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1950. Hybridity selection inCampanula. Heredity4: 217–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andK. Mather. 1949. Elements of genetics. 446 pp. Macmillan Co., N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andM. B. Upcott. 1941. Spontaneous chromosome change. Jour. Genet.41: 297–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derick, R. A., andR. M. Love. 1937. Artificially induced fatuoids in a dwarf mutant oat. Sci. Agr.17: 703–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digby, L. 1912. The cytology ofPrimula kewensis and of other relatedPrimula hybrids. Ann. Bot.26: 357–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1930a. Translocations involving the third and the fourth chromosomes ofDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics15: 347–399.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1930b. Cytological map of the second chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster. Biol. Zentralbl.50: 671–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931. The decrease of crossing over observed in translocations, and its probable explanation. Amer. Nat.65: 214–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932a. Studies on chromosome conjugation. I. Translocations involving the second and the Y-chromosomes ofDrosophila melanogaster. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.60: 235–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932b. Cytological map of the X-chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster. Biol. Zentralbl.52: 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Studies in chromosome conjugation. II. The relation between crossing over and disjunction of chromosomes. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.64: 269–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. 364 pp. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. H. Sturtevant. 1931. Translocations between the second and third chromosomes ofDrosophila and their bearing onOenothera problems. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 421, II, 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, K. S. 1943. Genetical and cytological studies ofMusa. V. Certain edible diploids. Jour. Genet.45(2): 113–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----- andN. W. Simmonds. 1949. The cytogenetics of bananas. Proc. VIII Int. Congr. Genet., p. 562. Stockholm, 1948. Suppl. Vol., Hereditas.

  • Ellenhorn, J. E. 1940. On the genesis of the chromosome set ofRhoeo discolor Hance. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS27: 361–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerton, S. 1939. The origin and geographical distribution ofTriticum sphaerococcum Perc. and its cytogenetical behavior in crosses withT. vulgare Vill. Jour. Genet.38: 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, W. 1936. Meiosis and fertility in certain British varieties of the cultivated potato (S. tuberosum). Genetica18: 217–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1939. The cytology of certain diploid and tetraploidAvena hybrids. Proc. Int. Genet. Congr.: 109–110.

  • Emerson, R. A., G. W. Beadle, andA. C. Fraser. 1935. A summary of linkage studies in maize. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem. 180.

  • Emerson, S. H. 1928a. Multiple-factor inheritance in crosses betweenOenothera grandiflora andOenothera Franciscana. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci.9: 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1928b. The mechanism of inheritance inOenothera. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Mich. Part I. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci.9: 117–120. 1928; Part II. Genetics16: 325–348. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Chromosome rings inOenothera, Drosophila, and maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.18: 630–632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935. The genetic nature of de Vries’ mutations inOenothera lamarckiana. Amer. Nat.59: 545–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. A genetic and cytological analysis ofOenothera pratincola and one of its revolute-leaved mutations. Jour. Genet.32: 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emsweller, S., andH. A. Jones. 1935. Meiosis inAllium fistulosum, Allium cepa, and their hybrids. Hilgardia9: 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1945. Further studies on the chiasmata of theAllium cepa × A. fistulosum hybrid and its derivatives. Amer. Jour. Bot.32: 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ephrussi, B., andE. Sutton. 1944. A reconsideration of the mechanism of position effect. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.30: 183–197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erlanson, E. W. 1929. Cytological conditions and evidence for hybridity in North American wild roses. Bot. Gaz.87: 443–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931. Chromosome organization inRosa. Cytologia2: 256–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Chromosome pairing, structural hybridity, and fragments inRosa. Bot. Gaz.94: 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. 1938. Meiosis und crossing-over. Zytologische und genetische Untersuchungen anAntirrhinum majus L. Zeits. Bot.33: 241–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Zytogenetische Untersuchungen anAntirrhinum majus L. Zeits. Bot.34: 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flovik, K. 1938. Cytological studies of Arctic grasses. Hereditas24: 265–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolik, E. F. 1948. Chromosome segregation in maize translocations from X-rayed material and in crosses producing rings of six chromosomes. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • ————— andC. R. Burnham. 1950. Chromosome segregation in maize crosses producing rings of six chromosomes. Genetics35: 106. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima, E. 1937. [On the chromosomal variants in Japanese radish (a prelim. note)]. Jap. Jour. Genet.13: 222–223. [In Japanese].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1949. [On a new structural hybrid appeared in the Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.)]. Jap. Jour. Genet.24: 7–8. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gairdner, A. E., andC. D. Darlington. 1930. Structural variation in the chromosomes ofCampanula percicifolia. Nature125: 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1931. Ring-formation in diploid and polyploidCampanula percicifolia. Genetica13: 113–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, D. 1939. Cytological studies in a chromosome ring-forming diploidNotonia grandiflora DC. Jour. Genet.38(3): 493–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, E. D. 1948. A reciprocal translocation inSorghum versicolor Anderss. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 295–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Chromosome orientation in rings of four chromosomes at metaphase I in species ofPara-sorghum, genusSorghum. Amer. Jour. Bot.37: 662. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954a. The orientation of multivalents at metaphase I in the subgeneraParasorghum andStiposorghum, genusSorghum. Genetics39: 969. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954b. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genusSorghum. III. The polyploid species of the subgeneraPara-sorghum andStiposorghum. Bot. Gaz.115: 336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, R. R. 1908. A study of reduction inOenothera rubrinervis. Bot. Gaz.46: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geckler, L. H. 1950. The cytogenetics and phylogenetic relationships of certain races ofEuoenothera from Northeastern North America. Ind. Univ. Publ., Sci. Ser.16: 160–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geitler, Lothar. 1938. Weitere cytogenetische Untersuchungen an naturlichen Populationen vonParis quadrifolia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.75: 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerassimova, H. 1935. The nature and causes of mutations: II. Transmission of mutations arising in aged seeds: occurrence of “homozygous dislocants” among progeny of plants raised from aged seeds. Cytologia6: 431–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Interspecific translocations inCrepis. URSS Acad. Sci., Inst. Genet., Bull.11: 143–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Chromosome alterations as a factor of divergence of forms. I. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS25: 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940a. [On the size of the satellites of the chromosomes]. [Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS Math. et. Nat. Ser. Biol.]1940: 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940b. [A translocation between the B- and D-chromosomes and the trisomic effect of the B-chromosome inCrepis tectorum L.] [Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS Math. et. Nat. Ser. Biol.]1940: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, D. U. 1948. Transfer of the mosaic-resistance factor between H chromosomes ofNicotiana glutinosa andN. tabacum. Jour. Agr. Res.76: 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953. Chromosomal translocations in interspecific hybrids of the genusGossypium. Evolution7: 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, N. 1940. Spontaneous chromosome aberrations inTradescantia. Genetics25: 69–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. Spontaneous chromosome aberrations in triploidTradescantia hybrids. Genetics26(6): 632–649.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, H. B. 1933. A study of dominant mosaic eye-colour mutants inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Tests involving crossing-over and non-disjunction. Jour. Genet.28: 69–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934. The effect of lethal genes on the non-disjunctional classes in mutual translocations ofDrosophila. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.67: 255–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1935. A study of factors influencing chromosomal segregation in translocations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Univ. Mo., Res. Bull. 231 (28 pp.)

  • Goodspeed, T. H. 1934.Nicotiana phylesis in the light of chromosome number, morphology and behavior. Univ. Calif., Publ. Bot.17: 369–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936.Nicotiana phylesis. Evidence of chromosomal differentiation and its significance. Proc. VI Int. Bot. Congr. Vol. 1: 165–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936b. Induced chromosomal aberrations. Vol. 2: 1281–1295.In: Biological effects of radiation. Ed. by B. M. Duggar. McGraw-Hill, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1937. Significance of cytogenetic alterations induced by high frequency radiation inNicotiana species. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 961–966.

  • —————. 1945. Cytotaxonomy ofNicotiana. Bot. Rev.11: 533–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947. On the evolution of the genusNicotiana. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.33: 158–171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andP. Avery. 1934. The cytogenetics of fourteen types derived from a single X-rayed sex cell ofNicotiana tabacum. Jour. Genet.29: 327–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1939. Trisomic and other types inNicotiana sylvestris. Jour. Genet.38: 381–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal-Ayengar, A. R. 1942. Structural hybridity inScilla species. Genetics27: 143–144. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, D. M. 1950. A cytogenetic study of deficiency duplication in certain translocation crosses in maize. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • ————— andC. R. Burnham. 1956. A cytogenetic study of deficiency-duplication produced by crossing interchanges in maize. Genetics41: 382–395.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, Werner. 1954. Das Auftreten kettenförmiger Chromosomenverbände in der Meiosis verschiendenerPhysalis-Arten. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.86: 157–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Verne. 1954. Genetic and taxonomic studies inGilia. VI. Interspecific relationships in the leafy-stemmedGilias. El Aliso3: 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andAlva Grant. 1954. Genetic and taxonomic studies inGilia. VII. The woodlandGilias. El Aliso3: 59–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunthardt, H., Luther Smith, M. E. Haferkamp, andR. A. Nilan. 1953. Studies on aged seeds. II. Relation of age of seeds to cytogenetic effects. Agron. Jour.45: 438–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, A. 1951. Induction of changes in genes and chromosomes. II. Mutations, environment and evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.16: 263–281.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. Swedish mutation work in plants: background and present organization. Acta Agr. Scand. IV: 361–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haga, T. 1937. Karyotypic polymorphism inParis hexaphylla Cham., with special reference to its origin and to the meiotic chromosome behavior. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 681–700.

  • —————. 1938. A reciprocal translocation inLillium hansonii Leicht. (A preliminary note). Jap. Jour. Genet.14: 297–299. [In Japanese; Eng. sum.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1943. A reciprocal translocation inLilium Hansonii Leicht. Cytologia13: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953. Meiosis inParis. II. Spontaneous breakage and fusion of chromosomes. Cytologia18: 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg, A. 1954. Cytogenetic analysis of erectoides mutations in barley. Acta Agr. Scand. IV: 472–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. Gustafsson. 1952. Allelism of erectoides mutations in barley. Hereditas38: 510–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg, Arne, andJ. H. Tjio. 1940. Cytological localization of the translocation point for the barley mutant erectoides 7. Hereditas36: 487–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1952. Cytological studies on some homozygous translocations in barley. Anal. Estac. Exp. Aula Dei2: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, C. W., Jr. 1950. A contribution to the cytogenetics of the genusOenothera, with special reference to certain forms from South America. Ind. Univ. Publ., Sci. Ser.16: 305–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, A. 1925. Zur Zytologie der GattungGodetia. Hereditas6: 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1928. Die Reduktionsteilung in den Samenanlagen einigerOenotheren. Hereditas11: 129–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1929. Chromosomenringe inPisum und ihre mutmassliche genetische Bedeutung. Hereditas12: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931a. Chromosomenverkettung beiGodetia undClarkia. Ber. Bot. Ges.49: 228–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931b. Über Chromosomenverkettung inPisum. Hereditas15: 17–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Neue Fälle von Chromosomenverkettung inPisum. Hereditas16: 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Die Konjugation der Chromosomen bei einigenSalix-Bastarden. Hereditas18: 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934. Chromosomenverbindungen in einigen Kreuzungen zwischen halbsterilen Erbsen. Hereditas19: 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936a. Die Reduktionsteilung in enigen Artbastarden vonPisum. Hereditas21: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936b. Die Zytologie eines trisomischenPisum-Typus. Hereditas21: 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940a. Eine tertiare Trisome vonGodetia whitneyi. Bot. Not.1940: 395–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940b. Die Meiosis bei verschiedenen Mutanten vonGodetia whitneyi. Lunds Univ. Årsskrift N.F. Avd. 2.36: 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941a. Zur Zytologie vonGodetia-Arten und Bastarden. Hereditas27: 318–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941b. Zytologische Beobachtungen an Kreuzungen zwischenGodetia deflexa undG. whitneyi. Bot. Not.1941: 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942. Zytologische Studien an Rassen un Rassenbastarden vonGodetia whitneyi und verwandten Arten. Lunds Univ. Årsskrift. N.F. Avd. 2,38: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1943a. An interspecific translocation causing changed segregation ratios. Hereditas29: 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1943b. Meiosis in a nullisomic and in an asyndeticGodetia whitneyi. Hereditas29: 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1944a. Studies on a peculiar chromosome configuration inGodetia whitneyi. Hereditas30: 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1944b. Eine “homozygotische” interspezifische Translokation. Hereditas30: 642–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1945a. Überzählige Chromosomen in einer Rasse vonGodetia nutans Hiorth. Bot. Not.1945: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1945b. Zytologische Studien an monosomischen Typen vonGodetia whitneyi. Hereditas31: 129–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1946. Meiosis in hybrid nullisomics and certain other forms ofGodetia whitneyi. Hereditas32: 495–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1947. Contributions to a cytological analysis of the species differences ofGodetia amoena andG. whitneyi. Hereditas33: 235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammarlund, C. 1923. Über einen Fall von Koppelung und freie Kombination bei Erbsen. Hereditas4: 235–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1928. Zweite Mitteilung über einen Fall von Koppelung und freier Kombination bei Erbsen. Hereditas10: 303–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1929. Dritte Mitteilung über einen Fall von Koppelung und freier Kombination bei Erbsen. Hereditas12: 210–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. Håkansson. 1930. Parallelism of chromosome ring formation, sterility and linkage inPisum. Hereditas14: 97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, W. D. 1950. The analysis and interpretation of genetic data involving translocations obtained from F2 and F3 generations in barley. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue Univ.

  • —————. 1952. An interpretation of the observed amount of recombination in interchange heterzygotes in barley. Genetics37: 90–100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andH. H. Kramer. 1949. The genetic analysis of two chromosome interchanges in barley from F2 data. Genetics34: 687–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1950. The determination of linkage intensities from F2 and F3 genetic data involving chromosomal interchanges in barley. Genetics35: 559–569.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, E. 1952. Die Endenbezifferung der Chromosomen einigerOenotheren aus dem SubgenusRaimannia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.84: 417–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, A. 1950. Cytogenetic studies ofOenothera, subgenusRaimannia. Ind. Univ. Publ., Sci. Ser.16: 255–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. B. 1953.In: Documented chromosome numbers of plants. Madrono12: 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, P. 1941. Vererbbare Semisterilität bei Mäusen nach Röntgenbestrahlung, Verursacht durch reziproke Chromosomentranslokationen. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.79: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiorth, G. 1941. Zur Genetik und Systematik der GattungGodetia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.79: 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942a. Zur Genetik und systematik der Amoena-gruppe der GattungGodetia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.80: 289–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942b. Eine Translokation zwischen einemGodetia whitneyi und einemG. deflexa Chromosome. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.80: 565–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947a. Zur Genetik der Konfiguration 3-Kette + Univalent beiGodetia whitneyi. Biol. Zentralbl.66: 20–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947b. Zur Genetik der ArtbastardesGodetia amoena ×G. whitneyi. Züchter17/18: 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947c. Über drei allotrisome Typen sowie eine interspezifische Translokation ausGodetia whitneyi ×G. deflexa. Biol. Zentralbl.66: 106–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948a. Über das Wesen der Monosomen und der Disomen Anordnung. 3-Kette + univalent beiGodetia whitneyi. Zeits. Ind. Abst.82: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1984b. Über Hemmungssysteme beiGodetia whitneyi. I. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.82: 12–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948c. Über Hemmungssysteme beiGodetia whitneyi. II. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.82: 276–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948d. Zur Genetik der Monosomen vonGodetia whitneyi. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.82: 230–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoar, C. S. 1931. Meiosis inHypericum punctatum. Bot. Gaz.92: 396–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andE. J. Haertl. 1932. Meiosis in the genusHypericum. Bot. Gaz.93: 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosono, S. 1935. Karyogenetische Studien bei reinen Arten und Bastarden der Emmerreihe. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Kuan-Jen. 1945. On sterility resulting from crossing different types of rice. Indian Jour. Genet. & Plant Breed.5: 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huskins, C. L. 1925. Chromosomes inAvena. Nature115: 677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931. A cytological study of Vilmorin’s unfixable dwarf wheat. Jour. Genet.25: 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, L. 1936. Cytological studies on the peanut,Arachis. II. Chromosome number, morphology and behavior, and their application to the problem of the origin of the cultivated forms. Cytologia7: 396–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Chromosome breakage and knot formation inParis andPancratium. Jour. Genet.34(2): 329–338. 20 fig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M. A. Cytogenetic studies of tertiary trisomics in maize derived from a translocation heterozygote. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • —————. 1950b. Cytogenetic studies of tertiary trisomics in maize. Genetics35: 671–672. [Abst.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. Association tests between chromosomal interchanges in maize and resistance to the European corn borer. Agron. Jour.46: 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeno, S. 1923. Erblichkeitsversuche an einigen Sippen vonPlantago major. Jap. Jour. Bot.1: 153–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1925. Nachträge zu meiner Angabe überPlantago contorta. Jap. Jour. Bot.2: 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, J. 1927. Studies on the inheritance of sterility in rice. Jour. Fac. Agr. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. [Sapporo]20: 79–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, N. K. 1945. Cytological investigations on some of the interspecific hybrids of (American × Asiatic) × American cottons and their progenies. Indian Jour. Genet. & Plant Breed.5: 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, Gertrud S. 1947. The product method of calculating linkage from F2 data involving semisterility; and its application to a barley translocation. Genetics32: 580–591.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson, H. 1944. Meiotic aberrations and sterility inAlopecurus myosuroides Huds. Hereditas30: 469–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. F. 1937. Somatic segregation and its relation to atypical growth. Genetics22: 484–522.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938. Translocation in relation to mosaic formation in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.24: 208–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1944. Growth changes in maize endosperm associated with the relocation of chromosome parts. Genetics29: 420–427.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W. 1931. Sterility in rice hybrids. Indian Jour. Agr. Sci.1: 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachidze, N. T. 1934. [Methods of cytological analysis in studying the genetics of corn.] Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Plant. Breed., II.6: 173–184. [In Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Katayama, Y. 1935a. Karyogenetic studies on X-rayed sex cells and their derivatives inTriticum monococcum. Jour. Coll. Agr. [Tokyo]13: 333–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935b. On a chromosomal variant induced by X-ray treatment inTriticum monococcum. Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan11: 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935c. Karyological comparisons of haploid plants from octoploidAegilotricum and diploid wheat. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 349–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. Chromosome studies in some Alliums. Jour. Coll. Agr. [Tokyo]13: 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, K. 1930. Cytological studies of pollen mother cells ofRhoeo discolor Hance with special reference to the question of the mode of syndesis. Mem. Coll. Sci. [Kyoto]5B: 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattermann, G. Chromosomenuntersuchungen bei Gramineen. Planta12: 19–37.

  • —————. 1931. Über die Bildung polyvalenter Chromosomenverbände bei einigen Gramineen. Planta12: 732–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Weitere zytologische Untersuchungen anBriza media mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der durch Verbande aus vier Chromosomen ausgezeichneten Pflanzen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.78: 43–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934. Die zytologischen Verhältnisse einiger Weizen-Roggen-Bastarden und ihrer Nachkommenschaft (F2). Züchter6: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935a. Die Chromosomenverhältnisse bei Weizenroggenbastarden der zweiten Generation mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Homologiebeziehungen. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.70: 265–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935b. Die Parrungsintensität der Chromosomen bei Weizen-Roggenbastarden zweiter Generation im Vergleich zum Weizenelter. Planta24: 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Das Verhalten des Chromosoms für Behaarung roggenbehaarter Nachkommen aus Weizenroggenbastardieriung in neuen Kreuzungen mit Roggen und Weizen. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.74: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938a. Zur Kenntnis der strukturellen Hybriden vonBriza media. II. Planta27: 669–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938b. Kreuzungsversuche beiBriza media zur Klärung der strukturellen Hybridität. III. Planta27: 674–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Ein neuer Karyotyp bei Roggen. Chromosoma1(B): 284–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. P. 1946. Organization of the chromosome. I. Break distribution and chromosome recombination inDrosophila melanogaster. Jour. Exp. Zool.102: 293–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. I. 1947. A cytological study of the effect of temperature on crossing over in corn. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • —————. 1954. Theoretical aspects of crossing-over in T5-6c. in corn,Zea mays L. La Cellule55: 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1955. Effect of temperature on crossing-over in heterozygous T5-6c with homozygous inversion in chromosome 5 in maize. Cytologia20: 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihara, H. 1925. Chromosomes ofRumex acetosella L. Bot. Mag. Tokyo39: 353–360. [In Japanese.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1927a. Über das Verhalten der “end to end” gebundenen Chromosomen vonRumex acetosella undOenothera biennis wahrend der heterotypischen Kernteilung. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.66: 429–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1929. A case of linkage of sex chromosomes with autosomes in the pollen mother cell ofHumulus japonicus. [Eng. sum.] Jap. Jour. Genet.5: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1932. Translokation und Sterilität von Standpunkte der Genomtheorie. Agr. & Hort.7:

  • —————. 1936. Ein diplo-haploides Zwillingspaar beiTriticum durum. Agr. & Hort.11: 1425–1434. [Plant Breed. Abstr.7: 609].

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953. Genetics ofBombyx andDrosophila: a comparison of materials, methods and results. Report, Kihara Inst. for Biol. Res. (Seiken Ziho)6: 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— undY. Katayama. 1932. Über das Vorkommen von happloiden Pflanzen beiTriticum monococcum. Kawagaku2: 48–410. [In Japanese]. 1933. Agr. & Hort.8: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— undF. Lilienfeld. 1932. Genomanalyse beiTriticum undAegilops. IV. Untersuchungen anAegilops ×Triticum undAegilops × Aegilops-Bastarden. Cytologia3: 384–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— und —————. 1935a. Kerneinwanderung und Bildung syndiploider Pollenmutterzellen bei dem F1-BastardTriticum aegilopoides ×Aegilops squarrosa. Jap. Jour. Genet.10: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— und —————. 1935b. Genomanalyse beiTriticum undAegilops. VI. Weitere Untersuchungen anAegilops ×Triticum-undAegilops ×Aegilops-Bastarden. Cytologia6: 195–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----- und -----. 1948. Chromosome pairing and fertility in a new syntheticTriticum spelta. Comp. Rend. Acad. Polon. Sci. et Lett. (Sc. Math. et Nat.) No. 1. [Krakow.]

  • ————— undS. Matsumura. 1941. Genomanalyse beiTriticum undAegilops. VIII. Cytologia11(4): 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— undNishiyama, I. 1930. Genomaffinitäten in tri-, tetra-, und pentaploiden Weizenbastarden. Cytologia1: 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----- und -----. 1937. Possibility of crossing-over between semihomologous chromosomes from two different genoms. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 654–666.

  • ————— undY. Yamamoto. 1931. Karyomorphologische Untersuchungen anRumex acetosa L. undRumex montanus Desf. Cytologia3: 84–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— und —————. 1935. Chromosomen-verhältnisse beiAucuba chinensis Benth. [Eng. sum.] Agr. & Hort.10: 2485–4496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, P. C. 1932. Further studies inTradescantia virginiana var.humilis andRhoeo discolor. Jour. Genet.26: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andC. A. Auerbach. 1941. Chromosome breakage and sterility in the mouse. Nature148: 501–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondō, M. 1927. Über die Ergebnisse der Pedigree-zucht der semisterilen Reispflanzen. Ber. Ohara Inst. Landw. Forsch.3: 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— undS. Fujimoto. 1927. Spontane Entstehung einer missgestalteten Reispflanze “magatamaine”. Ber. Ohara Inst. Landw. Forsch.3(4): 421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— undOno, M. 1924–25. Über eine Art von Semisterilität beim Reise. Jap. Jour. Bot.2: p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, N. 1946. Conjugation of semi-homologous chromosomes between Cu and E genom inAegilops ovata. Jap. Jour. Genet.21: 59–60. [Japanese.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korjukaev, S. I. 1940. On the nature of translocations inCrepis capilaris Wallr. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. URSS26(4): 400–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, D. 1937. Formation of a quadrivalent group in a hybrid betweenTriticum vulgare and aTr. vulgare extracted derivative. Curr. Sci.5: 537.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938. Heterochromatic (inert) regions in the chromosomes ofCrepis capillaris. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS18: 463–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939a. The frequency of polyembryony and chlorophyll deficiencies in rye. Curr. Sci.8(8): 356–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939b. Lethality of gametes conditioned by exchange of segments between partially homologous chromosomes in aNicotiana species hybrid. Curr. Sci.8: 260.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939c. Autosyndesis and structural hybridity in F1 hybridHelianthus tuberosus L. ×Helianthus annuus L. and their sequences. Genetica21: 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939d. Heterochromatin, somatic “crossing-over” and the interchange hypothesis between non-homologous chromosomes. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.8: 11–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941a. The problem of haploidy. Bib. Genet.13: 1–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941b. Wheat phylesis and wheat breeding from a cytogenetic point of view. Bib. Genet.13: 149–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1941–1943. Citogenetics of the genusNicotiana. 1071 pp. State’s Printing Hous, Sofia. [In Russian and English.]

  • —————. 1949. Homozygous translocation obtained in the second generation from material treated with neutrons. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.30: 259–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, H. H. 1954. Recombination in selfed chromosome interchange heterozygotes. Chap. 40 in “Statistics and Mathematics in Biology” ed. by O. Kempthorne, T. A. Bancroft, J. W. Gowen and J. L. Lush. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Ia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andC. R. Burnham. 1947. Methods of combining linkage intensity values from backcross, F2 and F3 genetic data. Genetics32: 379–390.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————,Rosemarie Veyl andW. D. Hanson. 1954. The association of two genetic linkage groups in barley with one chromosome. Genetics39: 159–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswamy, N. 1939. Cytological studies in a haploid plant ofTriticum vulgare. Hereditas25: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940. Untersuchungen zur Zytologie und Systematik derGramineen. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.60(A): 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andG. N. R. Ayyangar. 1941a. Chromosomal alterations induced by X-rays in Bajri (Pennisetum typhoides). Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.20: 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1941b. An autotriploid in the pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. & H. 1). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.13: 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, R. 1945. Cytogenetic studies inSolanum, sect.Tuberarium. Hereditas31: 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947. Studies on linkage relations of the Cy factors inPisum. Hereditas33: 405–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948. Linkage values in an interchange complex inPisum. Hereditas34: 280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1949a. Genetical and cytological problems inSolanum, Lycopersicum, Pisum andAllium. Proc. IX Int. Congr. Genet. 1948: 35–39. Hereditas, Supp. Vol. 1949.

  • —————. 1949b. Contributions to the genetics of the Gp-chromosome ofPisum. Hereditas35: 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Linkage calculations from semisterility data. Hereditas36: 457–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951. Cytogenetical studies on translocations inPisum. Hereditas37: 356–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammerts, W. E. 1934. On the nature of chromosome association inN. tabacum haploids. Cytologia6: 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht, H. 1939. Translokation, Genspaltung und Mutation beiPisum. Hereditas25: 341–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1944. Die Beziehungen zwischenPisum tibetanicum undsativum im Lichte von Kreuzungsergebnissen. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.38: 365–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1945. Die Koppelungsgruppe N-Z-Fa-Td vonPisum. Hereditas31: 347–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1946. Die Koppelungsgruppe Uni-M-Mp-F-St-B-Gl vonPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.4: 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948. Further studies of the linkage group Cp-Gp-Fs-Ast ofPisum sativum. Agri Hort. Genet.6: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1949. Interchanges inPisum caused by gene-mutations and the partner of interchange of V-Le. Agri Hort. Genet.7: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951a. Über partielle und Semisterilität, insbesondere beiPisum sativum. Zeits. Pflanzenzücht.30: 422–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951b. Genanalytische Studien zur Artberechtigung vonPisum humile Boiss. et Noë. [Eng. sum.] Agr. Hort. Genet.9: 107–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1952. Polymere Gene und Chromosomenstruktur beiPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.10: 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953a. New and hitherto known polymeric genes ofPisum. Agri Hort Genet.11: 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953b. Ein neues Gen Rf und die Genenkarte des Chromosoms III vonPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.11: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953c. The mathematical and genetical evaluation of segregation ratios. Agri Hort. Genet.11: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953d. Further studies of the interchange between the chromosomes III and V ofPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.11: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954a. Die Koppelung des Gens Wsp und die Genenkarte von Chromosom VII vonPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.12: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954b. Zur Kenntnis der Chromosomenstruktur vonPisum. Agri Hort. Genet.12: 121–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1955a. Ein Interchange Zwischen den Chromosomen I und VII von Pisum. Agri Hort. Genet.13: 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1955b. Ein neuer Struktur-typ vonPisum. Ein Fall mit einer einfachen Translokation und einer Duplikation. Agri Hort. Genet.13: 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, W. J. C. 1931. The genetics and cytology ofDahlia variabilis. Jour. Genet.24: 257–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazaro, R. C. 1944. Cytogenetic studies in maize of a translocation involving four pairs of chromosomes. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • Leszczak, W. 1950. Cyto-ecological studies inAconitum species from the Tatra Mountains. Acta. Soc. Bot. Polon.20: 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A. 1932. Cytological studies inAllium. II. Chromosome morphological contributions. Hereditas16: 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935. Cytological studies inAllium. VI. Hereditas20: 289–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936a. Die Zytologie vonAllium cepa ×fistulosum. Hereditas21: 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936b. Zytologische Studien anAllium schoenoprasm. Hereditas22: 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andS. L. Emsweller. 1938. Structural hybridity inNothoscordum fragans. Jour. Hered.29: 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Amphibalent formation inAllium cernuum and its consequences in the pollen. Bot. Not.1939: 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. The cytology of the species hybridAllium cepa ×fistulosum and its polyploid derivative. Hereditas27: 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942. The effect of chromosomal variation in sugar beets. Hereditas28: 345–399 (pp. 366–368).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, G. A. 1940. A cytological study of the progeny of X-rayedCrepis capillaris. Cytologia11: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. On the genotype control of the structural chromosome changes. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.15: 559–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. G. Araratian. 1931. Transformations of chromosomes under the influence of X-rays. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. Plant Breed.27: 265–303. [Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andN. Titova. 1934. Cytology of F1, F2 and F3 of X-rayedCrepis capillaris. Plant Industry in U.S.S.R.II: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andM. Sizova. 1934. On regularities in chromosome transformations induced by X-rays. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.3: 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1935. Further studies on regularities in chromosome transformations inCrepis capillaris induced by X-rays. Comp. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.4: 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. B. 1950. The phenomenon of position effect. Adv. Genet.3: 73–115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. 1950. The geographical distribution of supernumerary chromosomes in natural populations ofClarkia elegans Dougl. Genetics35: 674–675. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951. The origin of supernumerary chromosomes in natural populations ofClarkia elegans. Evolution5: 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953a. The mechanism of evolution in the genusClarkia. Evolution7: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953b. Chromosome phylogeny and habitat preference ofClarkia. Evolution7: 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1954. Quantitative variation in wild genotypes ofClarkia. International Union of Bio. Sci., Symposium, Ser. B. No. 15, 114–122.

  • ————— andM. E. Lewis. 1955. The genusClarkia. Univ. Calif., Pub. Bot.20: 241–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----- andM. R. Roberts. 1956. The origin ofClarkia lingulata. Evolution (In press).

  • Linnert, G.. Untersuchungen über die Cytologie polyploider Pflanzen, I. Chromosoma3: 328–356.

  • Longley, A. E. 1950. Cytological analysis of translocations in corn chromosomes resulting from ionizing radiation of the test able atomic bomb and X-rays and of translocations from other sources. Report of Naval Medical Research Section, Joint Task Force one, on Biological Aspects of Atomic Bomb Tests. Appendix # 10: 1–60.

  • ————— andC. F. Clark. 1930. Chromosome behavior and pollen production in the potato. Jour. Agr. Res.41: 867–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, Askell. 1944. Cytogenetic studies inRumex subgenusAcetosella. Hereditas30: 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Doris. 1942. Intersexuality inMelandrium rubrum probably caused by a translocation between the sex chromosomes. Hereditas28: 497–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, R. M. Cytogenetics of vulgare-like derivatives of pentaploid wheat crosses. Genetics24: 92. [Abstr.]

  • -----. Chromosome number and behavior in a plant breeder’s sample of pentaploid wheat hybrid derivatives. Canad. Jour. Res.18C: 415–434.

  • Lutkov, A. N. 1930. Interspecific hybrids ofPisum humilis (Boiss.) ×P. Sativum L. Proc. U.S.S.R. Congr. Genet., Plant & Animal Breed. 1929. Vol.2: 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Reciprocal translocations and gene mutations inPisum sativum induced by X-radiation of pollen. Bul. Appl. Bot., Genet & Plant Breed. II7: 377–416. [In Russian; Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeda, T., andSasaki. 1934. Chromosome behavior in the pollen mother cells of ‘Shogoindaikon’ and ‘Nerimadaikon’, the horticultural varieties ofRaphanus sativus L. Jap. Jour. Genet.10: 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallah, G. S. 1943. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. XVI. Structural differences among the chromosomes of a selected group of varieties. Genetics28: 525–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1952. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. XXV. Analysis of an interchange. Proc. Egypt. Acad. Sci.8: 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., andR. G. Reeves. 1939. The origin of Indian corn and its relatives. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 574.

  • Marino, A. 1947. Cytogenetic study of two partially sterile lines of maize. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • Marquardt, H. 1937. Die Meiosis vonOenothera I. Zeits. Zellforsch. Mikr. Anat.27: 159–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. Über Bau, Häufigkeit und Auswirkungen der spontanen Translokationen. Flora35: 239–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948. Das Verhalten röntgeninduzierter Viererringe mit grossen interstitiellen Segmenten beiOenothera Hookeri. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.82: 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. 1935. Chromosome behaviour in a triploid wheat hybrid. Zeits. Zellforsch. Mikr. Anat.23: 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Crossing over and heterochromatin in the X-chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics24: 413–435.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura, S., andY. Nakamura. 1943. [An example of a partially sterile plant homozygous for a translocation]. Jap. Jour. Genet.19: 1–7 [In Japanese, Germ. sum.]. [Plant Breed. Abst.21: 2537. 1951].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura, H. 1948. Behavior of reciprocal translocated chromosomes. Jap. Jour. Genet.23: 29. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1950. On the structural aberration of chromosomes found in natural populations ofTrillium. Proc. VII Int. Bot. Congr.: 222–223.

  • ————— andM. Kurabayashi. 1951. Chromosome studies ofTrillium kamtschaticum and its allies. XXIV. The association of kinetochores of non-homologous chromosomes at meiosis. Chromosoma4: 273–283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andT. Suto. 1935. Contributions to the idiogram study in phanerogamous plants. I. Jour. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. V,5: 33–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. 1930. A cytological demonstration of the location of an interchange between two non-homologous chromosomes ofZea mays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16: 791–796.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931a. The order of the genesc, sh andwx inZea mays with reference to a cytologically known point in the chromosome. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.17: 485–491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931b. Cytological observations of deficiencies involving known genes, translocations and an inversion inZea Mays. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull.163: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Cytological observations inZea on the intimate association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the midprophase of meiosis and its relation to diakinesis configurations. Proc. VI Int. Congr. Genet. Vol. 2: 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis inZea mays. Zeits. Zellforsch. Mikr. Anat.19: 191–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934. The relation of a particular chromosomal element to the development of the nucleoli inZea mays. Zeits. Zellforsch. Mikr. Anat.21: 294–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1938. The fusion of broken ends of sister half-chromatids following chromatid breakage at meiotic anaphases. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 290.

  • —————. 1941. Spontaneous alteration in chromosome size and form inZea mays. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.9: 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1945.Neurospora. I. Preliminary observations of the chromosomes ofNeurospora crassa. Amer. Jour. Bot.32(10): 671–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.36: 344–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951. Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.16: 13–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953. Induction of instability at selected loci in maize. Genetics38: 579–599.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, R. C., andJ. Unrau. 1952. A study of meiosis in a haploid ofTriticum vulqare Vill. and its progenies. Canad. Jour. Bot.30: 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechelke, F., andH. Stubbe. 1954. Studien an mutablen Genen. I.Antirrhinum majus L. mut.graminifolia. Zeits. Ind. Abst. Vererb.86: 224–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes, O. B. de. 1954. Nota sobre translocação no milho. Rev. Agr. [Piracicaba]29: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, M. Y. 1955. A cytological method for genome analysis inGossypium. Genetics40: 214–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andM. S. Brown. 1952. Viable deficiency duplications from a translocation inGossypium hirsutum. Genetics37: 678–692.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1954. The significance of multivalent formation in three-speciesGossypium hybrids. Genetics39: 546–557.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meurman, O. 1929a. Association and types of chromosomes inAucuba japonica. Hereditas12: 179–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1929b.Prunus laurocerasus L., a species showing high polyploidy. Jour. Genet.21: 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1930. Chromosome morphology and ring-formation inAucuba. V Int. Bot. Congr., Cambridge, Rep. Proc.: 242–243.

  • ————— undG. Rancken. 1932. Untersuchungen über die Chromosomenverhältnisse bei kultivierten Kartoffelsorten (Solanum tuberosum L.). Soc. Sci. Fennica Comment. Biol.30(20): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. R. 1940. Chromosome aberrations in the genus Phlox. Amer. Jour. Bot.27: 7S. [Abstr.]

  • Miller, P. A. 1951a. Variation of oil percentage in the corn kernel and a study of its inheritance through the use of chromosomal translocations. Iowa State Coll., Jour. Sci.25: 301–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951b. Use of chromosomal interchanges for investigating the inheritance of oil in the corn kernel. Agron. Jour.43: 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Mary B., T. H. Pittenger andH. K. Mitchell. 1952. Pseudowild types inNeurospora crassa. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.38: 569–580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, K. 1905. Über Reduktionsteilung in den Pollenmutterzellen einiger Monokotylen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.42: 83–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moh, C. C., andR. A. Nilan. 1954. “Short” chromosome—a mutant in barley induced by atomic bomb irradiation. Cytologia19: 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, ————— andF. C. Elliott. 1955. An unusual association of two mutant characters in atom-bombed barley. Jour. Hered.46: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andL. Smith. 1951. An analysis of seedling mutants (spontaneous, atomic bomb radiation and X-ray induced) in barley and durum wheat. Genetics36: 629–640.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1952. Three coincidental changes in atombombed barley. Jour. Hered.43: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, Aly H. 1953. Cytogenetic analysis of a line with interchanges involving four pairs of chromosomes. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • —————. 1954. Association tests between chromosomal interchanges in maize and tender pericarp in sweet corn. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minn. Diss. Abst. (Univ. Minn.)14: 902–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. V. 1939. A spontaneous somatic exchange between nonhomologous chromosomes inDrosophila. Genetics24: 747–752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morinaga, T. 1934. Cyto-genetical studies onOryza sativa L. I. Studies on the haploid plant ofO. sativa. Jap. Jour. Bot.7: 73–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. [Cytogenetics inOryza]. [In Japanese]. Bot. & Zool.7: 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942. [About rice]. [In Japanese]. Chosen Nogakki Shi 1, 3–4: 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. W. 1954. Chromosome interchange by misdivision inTriticum. Canad. Jour. Bot.32: 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. 1929. The first cytological demonstration of a translocation inDrosophila. Amer. Nat.63: 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1930.Oenothera-like linkage of chromosomes inDrosophila. Jour. Genet.22: 335–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947. Locus of pale-lethal. Dros. Inf. Serv.16: 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. The nature of the genetic effects produced by radiation. Chapt. 7, p. 351–473. Radiation biology. Vol. I, part. I. McGraw-Hill Book Company, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1956. On the relation between chromosome changes and gene mutations. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology #8: 126–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müntzing, A. 1929. Cases of partial sterility in crosses with a Linnean species. Hereditas12: 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1930. Outlines to a genetic monograph of the genusGaleopsis. Hereditas13: 185–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Disturbed segregation ratios inGaleopsis caused by intraspecific sterility. Hereditas16: 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Studies on meiosis in diploid and triploidS. tuberosum L. Hereditas17: 223–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934. Chromosome fragmentation in aCrepis hybrid. Hereditas19: 284–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935. Chromosome behavior in someNicotiana hybrids. Hereditas20: 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. The effects of chromosomal variation inDactylis. Hereditas23: 113–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938. Sterility and chromosome pairing in intraspecificGaleopsis hybrids. Hereditas24: 117–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Chromosomenaberrationen bei Pflanzen und ihre genetische Wirkung. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Vererb.76: 323–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andR. Prakken. 1941. Chromosomal aberrations in rye populations. Hereditas27: 273–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamatsu, T. 1950. [Cytogenetics of the mutant rice appeared after atomic bomb explosion.] Jap. Jour. Genet.25: 242. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, S., andK. Saki. Association of chromosomes inChelidonium majus L. Jap. Jour. Genet.15: 23–28. [Eng. sum.]

  • ----- andH. Takusagawa. Über die Chromosomen einigerAmaryllidaceen. Bot. Mag. [Tokyo]46: 473–478.

  • Nakamura, S. 1931. Zytologische Beobachtungen über zwei Sippen steriler Reispflanzen. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Japan3: 259–265. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. 1943. (The F1 and F2 ofAegilops triaristata 6X ×Ae. columnaris) Rep. Kihara Inst. (Seiken Ziho)2: 55–63. [Plant Breed. Abst.20: 1524. 1950].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, H. K. 1936. The chromosome morphology, secondary association and origin of cultivated rice. Jour. Genet.33: 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navaschin, M. 1926. Variabilität des Zellkerns beiCrepis-Arten in Bezug auf die Artbildung. Zeits. Zelf. Mikr. Anat.4: 171–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1928. “Amphiplastie”-eine neue karyologische Erscheinung. Verh. V Int. Köng. Vererb. suppl. Vol. 2: Zeits Ind. Abst. Vererb. 1148–1152.

  • —————. 1931. Spontaneous chromosome alterations inCrepis tectorum L. Univ. Calif., Publ. Agr. Sci.6: 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1934. Chromosome alterations caused by hybridization and their bearing upon certain general genetic problems. Cytologia5: 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, E. 1933. Erblichkeitsversuche mitPisum. VI–VIII, VI.-Neue Fälle von Semisterilität. Hereditas17: 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. Erblichkeitsversuche mitPisum. IX. Fortgesetzte Studien über semisterile Formen. Hereditas21: 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Genetical studies on the N. III translocation inPisum. Hereditas36(1): 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, Y. Cytological observation of sterile plants of rice induced by atomic bomb. Jap. Jour. Genet.25: 257.

  • ————— andT. Saito. 1952. X-ray induced mutations in barley. Jour Plant Breed. (Jap.)1(4): 210–214. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andH. Kurakami. 1952. Mutations in rice induced by X-rays. Jour. Plant Breed. (Jap.)2(2): 65–71. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1953. Analysis and synthesis of reciprocal translocations in barley. Jour. Plant Breed. (Jap.)3(1): 45–47. [In Japanese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama, I. 1929. The genetics and cytology of certain cereals. I. Jap. Jour. Genet.5: 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novitski, E. 1951. Non-random disjunction inDrosophila. Genetics36: 267–280.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nybom, N. 1954. Karyotype and viability in barley. Acta Agr. Scand. IV: 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehlkers, Fr. 1936. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Meiosis. III. Zeits. Bot.30: 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oinuma, T. 1952a. Karyomorphology of cereals. Biol. Jour. Okayama Univ.1: 12–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1952b. Karyomorphology of cereals. VII. Reciprocal translocation in barley and its karyomorphology. In Jap., Eng. summary. La Kromosomo12–13: 460–465. (This duplicates the section on transloc. in the 1952a paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oka, H., T. T. Chang andM. S. Hong. 1953. Reciprocal translocation in rice—a preliminary note. Jap. Jour. Genet.28: 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, T. A. 1948. A hybrid betweenCrepidiastrum keisukeana andParaixeris denticulata. Jap. Jour. Genet.23: 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy, N. 1938. Cytogenetics of some X-ray derivatives in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Jour. Genet.37: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Cytogenetical studies in Oryzeae and Phalarideae. III. Ann. Bot. (n.s.)3: 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, G. N. 1940a. Studies in the cytology of cereals. Jour. Genet.39: 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940b. Studies in the cytology ofCrocus. Ann. Bot. (n.s.)4: 227–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andS. N. Singh. 1949. Studies in the genusLuffa. I. Cytogenetic investigations in the interspecific hybridL. cylindrica ×L. acutangula. Indian Jour. Gen. & Plant Breed.9: 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, E. B. 1952. Studies on crossing over in homozygous and heterozygous chromosome rearrangements inZea mays. Ph.D. Thesis, Calif. Inst. Tech.

  • Pellew, C., andE. R. Sansome. 1931. Genetical and cytological studies on the relations between Asiatic and European varieties ofPisum sativum. Pellew, C. I. Partial sterility in hybrids of a Thibetan and a European variety. Jour. Genet.25: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Linkage in structural hybrids inPisum sativum. Nature139: 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940. Genetical studies on the first reciprocal translocation found inPisum sativum. Jour. Genet.39: 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, C. 1954. An analytical study of chromosome behavior in a wheat haploid. Canad. Jour. Bot.33: 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peto, F. H. 1933. The cytology of certain intergeneric hybrids betweenFestuca andLolium. Jour. Genet.28: 113–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrov, D. F. 1935. Reduction division in karyotypical aberrants ofCrepis capillaris. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. Plant Breed.8: 29–58. [Eng. Sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Philp, J., andC. L. Huskins. 1931. The cytology ofMatthiola incana R. Br. especially in relation to the inheritance of double flowers. Jour. Genet.24: 359–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipkin, Sarah Bedichek. 1940. Segregation and crossing over in a 2,3 translocation inDrosophila melanogaster. Univ. Texas, Publ.4032: 73–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittenger, T. H. 1954. The general incidence of pseudo-wild types inNeurospora crassa. Genetics39: 326–342.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pohlendt, G. 1942. Cytologische Untersuchungen an Mutanten vonAntirrhinum Majus L. II. Mosaikpflanzen mit reziproken Translokationen. Chromosoma2: 388–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontecorvo, G., E. Forbes andO. B. Adam. 1949. Genetics of the homothallic ascomyceteAspergillus nidulans. Heredity3: 385. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, R., andA. Müntzing. 1942. A meiotic peculiarity in rye, simulating a terminal centromere. Hereditas28: 441–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preer, L. B. 1950. A cytogenetic study of certain broad-leaved races ofOenothera. Ind. Univ. Publ., Sci. Ser.16: 82–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Propach, H. 1937. Cytogenetische Untersuchungen in der GattungSolanum, Sect.Tuberarium. IV. Tetraploide und sesquidiploide Artbastarde. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Vererb.74: 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putt, E. D. 1954. Cytogenetic studies of sterility in rye. Canad. Jour. Agr. Sci.34: 81–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramage, R. T. 1955. The trisomics of barley. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • Ramanujam, S. Cytogenetical studies inOryzeae. A. Cytological behaviour of an autotriploid in rice (Oryza sativa). Jour. Genet.35: 183–258.

  • Ramiah, K. 1931. Preliminary investigations on the occurrence of sterility in rice. Agr. & Live Stock in India1: 416–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, andS. Ramanujam. 1935. Chromosome ring in X-rayed rice. Proc. Assoc. Econ. Biol. [Coimbatore]2: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancken, G. 1934. Zytologische Untersuchungen an einigen wirtschaftlich wertvollen Wiesengrasern mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von strukturellen Abweichungen in dem Chromosomenkomplement. Acta Agralia Fennica29: 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, L. F. 1950. Cytological and phenotypical effects induced in maize by X-rays and the Bikini “Test Able Atom Bomb”. Jour. Cell. & Comp. Physiol.35, Suppl. 1: 103–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andC. H. Li. 1949. Cytogenetic effects in corn exposed to atomic bomb ionizing radiation at Bikini. Science108: 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganathan, B. 1950. Studies on the mutagenic action of chemical and physical agencies on yeasts II. Mutations induced in yeast by temperature shocks. Jour. Indian Inst. Sci.32A: 91–111. [Plant Breed. Abst.22: 970. 1952].

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson, J. 1934. Genetically changed likage values inPisum. III. Segregation of linkage intensity in crosses. Hereditas19: 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raw, A. R. 1937. Genetical studies with wheat haploids ofTriticum vulgare. Jour. Dept. Agr., Victoria35: 300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, O. 1946. Artbildung in der GattungOenothera. Naturwiss.33: 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M. M. 1931. Linkage values in an interchange inZea. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.17: 694–698.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. A cytogenetical study of a reciprocal translocation inZea. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 1022–1031.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Meiosis in maize. Jour. Hered.41: 59–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1952. Preferential segregation in maize. p. 66–80. Heterosis (Chapt. 4). Ed. by J. W. Gowen. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andE. Dempsey. 1953. Cytogenetic studies of deficient-duplicate chromosomes derived from inversion heterozygotes in maize. Amer. Jour. Bot.40: 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andB. McClintock. 1935. The cytogenetics of maize. Bot. Rev.1: 292–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribbands, C. R. 1937. The consequences of structural hybridity at meiosis inLilium × testaceum. Jour. Genet.35: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E. 1929. A chromosome ring inPisum. Nature124: 578–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. M. 1935.Setcreasea brevifolia, a further example of polyploidy and structural hybridity in theTradescantiae. Bot. Gaz.97: 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richharia, R. H. 1937. Cytological investigation ofRaphanus sativus, Brassica oleracea, and their F1 and F2 hybrids. Jour. Genet.34: 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. M. 1942. The effects of translocation on growth inZea mays. Genetics27: 584–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. R., andH. Lewis. 1955. Subspeciation inClarkia biloba. Evolution9: 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. S. 1952. The genotype of the endosperm and embryo as it influences vivipary in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.38: 580–583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, Herschel. 1942. Translocations involving ‘B’ chromosomes in maize. Genetics27: 167. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947. Mitotic nondisjunction in the case of interchanges involving the B-type chromosome of maize. Genetics32: 391–409.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948. Directed fertilization in maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.34: 36–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940. Factors affecting mitotic non-disjunction in maize. Genetics35: 132–133. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. andA. J. Ullstrup. 1952. The use of A–B translocations to locate genes in maize. Agron. Jour.43: 450–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, G. v. Artkreuzungen in der GattungPisum, insbesondere zwischenP. sativum L. undabyssinicum Braun. Hereditas30: 261–400.

  • Saboe, L. C. 1942. Utilization of chromosomal interchanges in maize to determine the inheritance and linkage relations of factors for reaction toUstilago Zeae. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minn.

  • ————— andH. K. Hayes. 1941. Genetic studies of reactions to smut and of firing in maize by means of chromosomal translocations. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.33: 463–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, H. C. 1925. A micro dissection of the pachytene threads ofTradescantia virginica L. with observations on some aspects of meiosis. Jour. Gen Physiol.9: 181–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sansome, E R. 1931. Genetical and cytological studies on the relations between Asiatic and European varieties ofPisum sativum. II. Chromosome association inPisum. Jour. Genet.25: 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Segmental interchange inPisum sativum. Cytologia3: 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Segmental interchange inPisum. II. Cytologia5: 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Segmental interchange lines inPisum sativum. Nature139: 113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938a. Segmental interchange lines inPisum sativum. Nature142: 674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938b. A cytological study of an F1 betweenPisum sativum andP. humile, and of some types from the cross. Jour. Genet.36: 469–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Pairing behaviour and chiasma formation in plants with a structurally heterozygous pair inPisum. Genetica21: 420–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Reciprocal translocations inPisum. Nature166: 37–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andF. W. Sansome. 1940. Genetical sterility inPisum sativum. Nature145: 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satina, S. 1948. Chromosome end arrangements in two races ofDatura inoxia. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 797. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953. Chromosome end arrangements inDatura inoxia, D. meteloides andD. metel. Amer. Jour. Bot.40: 638–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andA. F. Blakeslee. 1941. Morphological differentiation in chromosomes ofDatura stramonium. Amer. Bot.28: 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, D. 1936a. Analysis of karyotypes ofScilla permixta and the allied species with special reference to the dislocation of the chromosome. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)50: 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1963b. Chromosome studies inScilla. III. Sat-chromosomes and the karyotype analysis inScilla and other genera. Cytologia7: 521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942. Karyotype alteration and phylogeny inLiliaceae and allied families. Jap. Jour. Bot.12: 57–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savchenko, P. F. 1935. Cytological investigation of the progeny of the vetch (V. sativa) subjected to X-ray treatment. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Plant Breed. II.8: 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, K. 1931. Chromosome ring formation inRhoeo discolor. Cytologia3: 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. Species hybrids inPlatanus andCampsis. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935. Chromosome structure in the meiotic chromosomes ofRhoeo discolor Hance. Jour. Arn. Arb.16: 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andE. Anderson. 1933. Segmental interchange in chromosomes ofTradescantia. Genetics8: 53–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, B., andL. La Cour. 1934. A chromosome survey ofAconitum. Ann. Bot.48: 693–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemann, E., undU. Nürnberg-Krüger. 1952. Neue Untersuchungen anSecale africanum Stopf. II.Secale africanum und seine Bastarde mitSecale montanum undSecale cereale. Naturwiss.6: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwemmle, J. 1926. Vergleichend zytologische Untersuchungen anOnagraceen. II. Die Reduktionsteilung vonEucharidium concinnum. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.65: 778–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, E. R. 1939a. Monosomes, trisomes, and segmental interchanges from a haploid ofTriticum vulgare. Genetics24: 84. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939b. Cytogenetic studies with polyploid species of wheat. I. Chromosomal aberrations in the progeny of a haploid ofTriticum vulgare. Genetics24: 509–523.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1941. Chromosome pairing and fertility in hybrids and amphidiploids in theTriticinae. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 337.

  • -----. The cytology and genetics of the wheats and their relatives. Adv. in Genet.2: 239–270.

  • -----. 1951. Improving an alien addition race by X-ray treatment. Amer. Soc. Agron. Meetings, State College, Pa., [Agron. Abst. p. 13–14].

  • —————. 1953. Nullisomic analysis in common wheat. Amer. Nat.87: 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1955. An intergeneric gene transfer induced by X-rays. Agron. Abst., Annual Meetings, Davis. p. 55.

  • Sherman, Marta. 1946. Karyotype evolution: a cytogenetic study of seven species and six interspecific hybrids ofCrepis. Univ. Calif., Publ. Bot.18(17): 369–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, S. M. 1940. Cytogenetics ofBrassica hybrids and species. Jour. Genet.40: 441–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N. W. 1945. Mieosis in tropicalRhoeo discolor. Nature155: 731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. Chromosome behavior in some tropical plants. Heredity8: 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1955. Isolation inMusa, sectionsEumusa andRhodochlamys. Evolution7: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonet, M. 1952. Sur l’étude meiotique les hybridesAegilops ventricosa avec desTriticum tetraploides et de leurs trihybridesAe. ventricosa × T. durum etAe. ventricosa × T. dicoccum avec.Triticum vulgare. Ann. Inst. Nat. Rech. Agron. B. Amel. Plantes2: 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. N., S. Sampath andR. K. Bansal. 1940. Two problems in the interpretation of meiosis in plants. Cytologia10: 516–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, J. R. 1948. Cytogenetic studies ofNeurospora crassa. Ph.D. Thesis, Calif. Inst. Tech.

  • Singleton, W. R., andF. J. Clark. 1940. Cytological effects of treating maize pollen with ultraviolet light. Genetics25: 136. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinoto, Y. 1929. Chromosome studies in some dioecious plants, with special reference to the allosomes. Cytologia1: 109–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940. Basikaryotype and its analysis. Cytologia10: 529–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizova, M. A. 1939. Structural chromosome alterations inTriticum durum. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.25: 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. H. 1933. Preliminary studies of chromosome rings inBrodiaea lactea. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.19: 605–609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. 1936. Cytogenetic studies inTriticum monococcum L. andT. Aegilopoides Bal. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 248.

  • —————. 1938. Cytogenetic studies inTriticum monococcum. Genetics23: 168. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Reciprocal translocations inTriticum monococcum. Genetics24: 86. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. An inversion, a reciprocal translocation, trisomics, and tetraploids in barley. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 741–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1946. Haploidy in Einkorn. Jour. Agr. Res.73: 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947a. Irregularities in a hybrid betweenTriticum durum andT. persicum. Jour. Agr. Res.75: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1947b. Chromosomal fragments in diploid wheat and their usefulness in genetic studies. Genetics32: 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948. A haplo-viable deficiency-duplication from an interchange inTriticum monococcum. Bot. Gaz.109: 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Effects of atomic bomb radiations and X-rays on seeds of cereals. Jour. Hered.41: 125–130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O. 1949. A cytogenetic study of two translocations in barley. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Nebr.

  • Snell, G. D. 1935. The induction by X-rays of hereditary changes in mice. Genetics20: 545–567.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1946. An analysis of translocations in the mouse. Genetics31: 157–180.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. A. 1951. Cytology of interstrain hybrids and the probable origin of variability inElymus glaucus. Amer. Jour. Bot.38: 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, L. J. 1931. The experimental modification of heredity in crop plants. I, II. Sci. Agr.11: 557–572, 645–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. On the genetic nature of induced mutations in plants. Proc. VI Int. Congr. Genet., Vol. 1: 274–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935. Genetic behavior of a haplo-viable internal deficiency in maize. Am. Nat.69: 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. The comparison of ultraviolet and X-ray effects on mutation. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.9: 168–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., Jr. 1938. Cytogenetic studies inPaeonia. II. The cytology of the diploid species and hybrids. Genetics23: 83–110.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1945. The cytological analysis of species hybrids. II. Bot. Rev.11: 463–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. pp. 223–225. Columbia Univ. Press, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andS. Ellerton. 1939. Structural hybridity inPaeonia californica andP. Brownii. Jour. Genet.38: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, J. I. Valencia, andR. Marie Valencia. 1946. Artificial and natural hybrids in theGramineae. Tribe I.Elymus, Sitanion andAgropyron. Amer. Jour. Bot.33: 338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, andM. S. Walters. 1949. Artificial and natural hybrids in theGramineae. TribeHordeae. III. Hybrids involvingElymus condensatus andE. triticoides. Amer. Jour. Bot.36: 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. 1926. Eine neue Chromosomaberration von Drosophila melanogaster und ihre Bedeutung für die Theorie der linearen Anordnung der Gene. Biol. Zentr.46: 505–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931. Zytologische-genetische Untersuchungen als Beweis für die Morgansch Theorie des Faktor-austauschs. Biol. Zentr.51: 541–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, H. T., andE. Steiner. 1955. Phylogenetic studies inOenothera: Further analysis of plants from the Southeastern U. S. Amer. Jour. Bot.42: 905–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoutamire, W. P. 1955. Cytological differentiation inGaillardia pulchella. Am. Jour. Bot.42: 912–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stow, I. 1926a. A cytological study on the pollen sterility inSolanum tuberosum L. Proc. Imp. Acad. (Japan)2: 426–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1926b. A cytological study on pollen sterility inSolanum tuberosum L. Jap. Jour. Bot.3: 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, J. 1936. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Meiosis. II. Zeits. Bot.30: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Meiosis. VII. Zeits. Bot.32: 225–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1941. Untersuchungen über die zytologische Grundlage der Komplexheterozygotie. Chromosoma2: 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. 1926. Renner’s studies on the genetics ofOenothera. Quart. Rev. Biol.1: 283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938. Essays on evolution. III. On the origin of interspecific sterility. Quart. Rev. Biol.13: 333–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andT. Dobzhansky. 1930. Reciprocal translocations inDrosophila and their bearing onOenothera cytology and genetics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16: 533–536.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1931. Contributions to the genetics of certain anomalies inD. melanogaster. II. Translocations between the second and third chromosomes ofDrosophila and their bearing onOenothera problems. Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ.421: 31–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara, J. 1940. On the multipartite chromosomes inCephalotaxus drupacea. Sci. Rep. Tohuko Imp. Univ.15(1): 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, E. 1935. Half-disjunction in an association of four chromosomes inPisum sativum. Ann. Bot.49: 689–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Cytological studies ofPisum: I. Structural hybridity inP. humile. Ann. Bot. (n.s.)1: 785–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Trisomics inPisum sativum derived from an interchange heterozygote. Jour. Genet.38: 459–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveschnikowa, I. N. 1929. [Reduction division in the hybrids ofVicia]. [In Russian]. Proc. U.S.S.R. Congr. Genet.2: 447–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. A study of interspecific hybrids ofVicia. Proc. VI Int. Cong. Genet., Ithaca, Vol. 2: 195. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. Translocations in hybrids as an indicator of karyotype evolution. Biol. Zhurn.5(2): 303–326. [Eng. sum.].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveschnikowa, I. N., andJ. P. Belekhova. 1935. Translocations in an interspecific hybrid. Bul. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Plant Breed. II.9: 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M. S., andH. W. Howard. 1953. The cytology and genetics of the potato (Solanum tuberosum) and related species. Bib. Genet.16: 1–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swezy, Olive. 1934. Somatic chromosomal variation in root-tips inCrepis. Cytologia6: 266–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1937. Alterations in somatic chromosomes inCrepis. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 149–155.

  • Tanaka, N. 1946. Structural hybridity in the genusCarex. Jap. Jour. Genet.21: 58–59. [Abstr.] [In Japanese].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tascher, W. R. 1929. Experiments with X-ray treatments on the seeds of certain crop plants. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Mo.

  • Tazima, Y. 1951. Separation of male and female silkworms in egg stage now becomes possible. Silk Dig. Tokyo61: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teas, H. J., J. W. Cameron, andAnna C. Newton. 1952. Tryptophan, niacin, indoleacetic acid, and carbohydrates in developing sugary and starchy maize kernels. Agron. Jour.44: 434–438.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Telezynski, H. 1935. Cytological studies on the unstable race ofPetunia violacea Lndl. with mosaic flower patterns. Bull. Acad. Polon. B. Sci. Nat. (I)1935: 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terao, H. 1921. Mutation and inheritance of semisterility in rice plant. Jap. Jour. Genet.1(1): 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1923. Mutation and inheritance of semisterility in the rice plant. Jap. Jour. Bot.1: abstract # 35.

  • ————— andU. Midusima. 1939. Some considerations on the classification ofOryza sativa L. into two subspecies so-calledJaponica andIndica. Jap. Jour. Bot.10: 213–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therman, Eeva. 1953a. Chromosomal evolution in the genusPolygonatum. Hereditas39: 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953b. On the cytology of the genusPolygonatum. GroupsVerticillata and Oppositifolia. Ann. Bot. Soc. Zool. Bot. Fenn.25(6): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. P., andM. G. Thompson. 1937. Reciprocal chromosome translocations without semi-sterility. Cytologia, Fujii Jub. Vol.: 336–342.

  • —————, andIsabel Hutcheson. 1942. Chromosome behavior and fertility in diploid wheat with translocation complexes of four and six chromosomes. Canad. Jour. Res. C.20: 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinney, Fred W. 1936. Chromosome behavior inAgrostis nebulosa. Bot. Gaz.97: 822–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjio, J. H., andA. Hagberg. 1951. Cytological studies on some X-ray mutants of barley. Anales Estac. Exper. Aula Dei2: 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobgy, H. A. 1943. A cytological study ofCrepis fuliginosa, C. neglecta, and their F1 hybrid, and its bearing on the mechanism of phylogenetic reduction in chromosome number. Jour. Genet.45(1): 67–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya, T. 1953. Fertility autotetraploids and their hybrids in barley. I. Meiosis and fertility in some autotetraploids. Report Kihara Inst. Biol. (Seiken Ziho) Kyoto 6: 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullstrup, A. J., andA. M. Brunson. 1947. Linkage relationships of a gene in corn determining susceptibility to aHelminthosporium leaf spot. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.39: 606–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upcott, M. 1937. The genetic structure ofTulipa. II. Structural hybridity. Jour. Genet.34: 339–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddoups, H. M. 1949. A study of semisterility and its linkage relationships in translocation stocks in barley. M.S. Thesis, Utah State Agr. Col.

  • Wahl, H. A. 1940. Chromosome numbers and meiosis in the genusCarex. Amer. Jour. Bot.27: 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, James L. 1941. The distribution of segmental interchange types inPaeonia californica andP. brownii. Amer. Jour. Bot.28: 726–727. [Abstr.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1942. Distribution of structural hybrids inPaeonia californica. Amer. Jour. Bot.29: 270–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1952. Heteromorphic chromosome pairs inPaeonia californica. Amer. Jour. Bot.39: 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1953. Spontaneous chromosome breakage in meiosis ofPaeonia californica. Genetics38: 699–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— andG. Ledyard Stebbins. 1942. Distribution of structural hybrids inPaeonia californica. Genetics27: 174. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, M. S. 1954. A study of pseudobivalents in meiosis of two interspecific hybrids ofBromus. Amer. Jour. Bot.41: 160–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andD. U. Gerstel. 1948. A cytological investigation of a tetraploidRhoeo discolor. Amer. Jour. Bot.35: 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanner, H. 1941. Cytologische Analyse der ArtbastardePrimula (pulverulenta Duthie ×Cockburniana Hemsl.) und ihrer Eltern. Arch. Julius Klaus-Stift Zürich16: 495–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellensiek, S. J. 1928. Linkage studies inPisum. II. Genetica11: 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andJ. S. Keijser. 1929.Pisum crosses. V. Inherited abortion and its linkage relations. Genetica11: 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, G. 1954. Entwicklungsgeschichtlichgenetische Untersuchungen an pollensterilen Mutanten vonPetunia. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Vererb.86: 35–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, R. H. A study of microspore quartet types in corn heterozygous for translocations. Proc. Minn. Acad. Sci.19: 19–20.

  • White, F. H., andC. R. Burnham. 1948. Chromosome translocation in barley. Amer. Soc. Agron. meetings, Fort Collins, Colo. [Abstr.].

  • Wiebalck, U. 1940. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Meiosis. XI. Zeits. Bot.36: 161–212.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. F. 1948. Inheritance in a species cross in the soybean. Genetics33: 131–132.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ————— andG. S. Williams. 1938. The use of prime types in linkage studies in the soybean. Genetics23: 176. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Winge, Ö. 1924. Zytologische Untersuchungen über Speltoide und andere Mutantenähnliche Aberranten beim Weizen. Hereditas5: 241–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1927. Chromosome behaviour in male and female individuals ofVallisneria spiralis andNajas marina. Jour. Genet.18: 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1941. On the probability of fixation of reciprocal translocations. Amer. Nat.75: 513–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, H. D. 1951.Rosa kordesii, eine neue amphidiploide Rose. Züchter21: 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, A. P. 1954. Chromosomes of garden roses. Amer. Rose Ann.1954: 36–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, Y. 1933. Karyotypes inRumex acetosa L. and their geographical distribution. Jap. Jour. Genet.8: 264–274. [Eng. sum.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935a. Karyogenetische Untersuchungen bei der GattungRumex. II. Jap. Jour. Genet.11: 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935b. Karyogenetische Untersuchungen bei der GattungRumex. IV. Ein Fall von einfacher Translokation beiRumex acetosa L. Cytologia6: 407–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937a. On the offspring of simple translocation heterozygotic plants inRumex acetosa L. Jap. Jour. Genet.13: 53–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937b. Karyogenetische Untersuchungen bei der GattungRumex. V. Nachkommenschaft in Bezug auf eine einfache Translocation heterozygotischer Pflanzen beiRumex acetosa L. Jap. Jour. Bot.8: 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1938. Karyogenetische Untersuchungen bei der GattungRumex. VI. Geschlechtsbestimmung bei eu- und aneuploiden Pflanzen vonRumex acetosa L. Mem. Coll. Agr., Kyoto Imp. Univ.43: 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamasaki, Y. 1936. Some observations on the microsporogenesis of the haploid plant ofTriticum vulgare Host. Jap. Jour. Bot.8: 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita, K. 1947. X-ray induced reciprocal translocations inTriticum aegilopoides andT. monococcum. Jap. Jour. Genet.22: 34–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1949. [Reciprocal translocation method for linkage analysis.] Jap. Jour. Genet.24 (Suppl. Vol. 2): 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950a. A synthetic complex heterozygote in Einkorn wheats:aegilopoides · monococcum. Proc. Japan Acad.26(9): 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1950b. Studies on X-ray induced reciprocal translocations in Einkorn wheat. I. Analysis of some new RT types. Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res. (Seiken Ziho)4: 102–110. [Eng. sum.]

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1951. Studies on X-ray induced reciprocal translocations in Einkorn wheats. III. A newly synthesized ring of 14 chromosomes in a complex heterozygote,aegilopoides · monococcum. Cytologia16: 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1952a. Studies on X-ray induced reciprocal translocations in Einkorn wheats: II. Rep. Kihara Inst. Biol. Res. (Seiken Ziho) [In Japanese, Eng. sum.]5: 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1952b. Certation as a result of reciprocal translocations. Bot. Soc. Amer., Pacific Section. [Abstr.]

  • —————. 1953. Studies on X-ray induced reciprocal translocations in Einkorn wheats: V. Jap. Jour. Genet.28: 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell, S. H. 1929. Meiosis in a triploidFragaria. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.15: 843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1954. Cytogenetics of the vegetable crops. I. Monocotyledons. Bot. Rev.20: 277–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerganian, G. 1953. Evidence disclosing the autosomal nature of sex chromosomes previously reported in the Chinese hamster,Cricetulus griseus. Genetics38: 703–704. [Abstr.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmering, S. 1955. A genetic study of segregation in a translocation heterozygote inDrosophila. Genetics40: 809–825.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Karl. 1937. Untersuchungen zur Physiologie der Meiosis. IV. Zeits. Bot.30: 577–603.

    Google Scholar 

General Articles (Not Cited)

  • Aase, Hannah C. 1946. Cytology of cereals. II. Bot. Rev.12: 255–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. 1939. Die Chromosomenmutationen. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Vererb.76: 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, D. E. 1947. Actions of radiations on living cells. 402 pp. The MacMillan Co., N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, A. E. 1952. Chromosome morphology in maize and its relatives. Bot. Rev.18: 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müntzing, Arne. 1939. Chromosomenaberrationen bei Pflanzen und ihre genetische Wirkung. Zeit. Ind. Abst. Vererb.76: 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M. M. 1936. Structural hybridity inLilium Martagon album × L. Hansonii. Jour. Genet.32: 411–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, G. 1951. Handbuch der Pflanzen-Anatomie. Band II. Allgemeine Pflanzenkaryologie. 2. Hälfte: Kernteilung und Kernverschmelzung. pp. 1–1040. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin-Nikolassee.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution of the Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Institute of Agriculture, St. Paul 1, Minnesota. Miscell. Journal Series No. 890, Agricultural Experiment Station.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burnham, C.R. Chromosomal interchanges in plants. Bot. Rev 22, 419–552 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872484

Keywords

Navigation