Abstract
There are, by now, three approaches to the de-Rham cohomology of Drinfel’d’sp-adic symmetric domain: the original work of Schneider and Stuhler, and more recent work of Iovita and Spiess, and of de Shalit. In the first part of this paper we compare all three approaches and clarify a few points which remained obscure. In the second half we give a short proof of a conjecture of Schneider and Stuhler, previously proven by Iovita and Spiess, on a Hodge-like decomposition of the cohomology ofp-adically uniformized varieties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
[dS] E. de Shalit,Residues on buildings and de Rham cohomology of p-adic symmetric domains, Duke Mathematical Journal106 (2000), 123–191.
[Go] R. Godement,Topologie algebrique et théorie des faisceaux, Hermann, Paris, 1973.
[I-S] A. Iovita and M. Spiess,Logarithmic differential forms on p-adic symmetric spaces, preprint, January 2000.
[Mus] G. A. Mustafin,Nonarchimedean uniformization, Mathematics of the USSR—Sbornik34 (1978), 187–214.
[S] P. Schneider,The cohomology of local systems on p-adically uniformized varieties, Mathematische Annalen293 (1992), 623–650.
[S-S] P. Schneider and U. Stuhler,The cohomology of p-adic symmetric spaces, Inventiones Mathematicae205 (1991), 47–122.
[S-T] P. Schneider and J. Teitelbaum,An integral transform for p-adic symmetric spaces, Duke Mathematical Journal86 (1997), 391–433.
[T] J. Teitelbaum,Values of p-adic L-functions and a p-adic Poisson kernel, Inventiones Mathematicae101 (1990), 395–410.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alon, G., de Shalit, E. On the cohomology of Drinfel’d’sp-adic symmetric domain. Isr. J. Math. 129, 1–20 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773150
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773150