Abstract
The main difference of this exposition of Pisier's counterexample from the original one is that in the proof of the key inequality probabilistic considerations (like Brownian motion) are replaced by certain standard constructions from the theory of Calderòn-Zygmund operators. Bibliography: 9 titles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. B. alexandrov and V. V. Peller, “Hankel operators and similarity to a contration,”Intern. Math. Res. Notices, 263–275 (1996).
J. F. Carlson, D. N. Clark, C. Foias, and J. P. Williams, “Projective HilbertA(D)-modules,”New York J. Math.,1, 26–38 (1994).
K. P. Davidson and V. Paulsen, “Polynomially bounded operators,”J. Reine Angew. Math., to appear.
J. Garcia-Cuerva and J. L. Rubio de Francia,Weighted Norm Inequalities and Related Topics, North Holland, Amsterdam (1985).
N. Nikolskii,Treatise on the Shift Operator, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986).
V. V. Peller, “Estimates of functions of power bounded operators and Hilbert space,”J. Oper. Theory,7, 341–372 (1982).
G. Pisier, “Un opérateur polynomiallement borné sur un Hilbert qui n'est pas semblable à une contraction,”C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris,323, 547–550 (1996).
G. Pisier, “A polynomially bounded operator on Hilbert space which is not similar to a contraction,”J. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.
G. Pisier, “Similarity problems and completely bounded maps,”Lect. Notes Math.,1618 (1995).
Additional information
Translated fromZapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI, Vol. 247, 1997, pp. 79–95.
Translated by S. V. Kislyakov.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kislyakov, S.V. Operators (not) similar to a contraction: Pisier's counterexample via singular integrals. J Math Sci 101, 3093–3103 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02673734
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02673734