Abstract
Technological change and social change are viewed as interdependent in this paper. At the same time technology's “push” is seen as outpacing the capability of social institutions to respond. Consequently, America risks losing its competitive edge economically and, further, is rapidly evolving toward a two-tiered occupational and social structure. This paper examines the relationship between technological and social change, the nature and significance of technological innovation and dissemination, and impacts on organizational life. Finally, the paper explores the role of higher education as well as strategies the university must adopt if it is to participate effectively in addressing the changes that are emerging as society moves from being production-and-material based to an information-based system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applegate, L. M., Cash, J. I., and Mills, D. Q. (1988, November–December). Information technology and tomorrow's manager.Harvard Business Review, 128–136.
Bluestone, B., & Harrison, B. (1982).The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
Boyle, C., Wheale, P., & Surgess, B. (1984).People, science and technology. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.
Burton, K. (1989, January 17). Growing use of computers in U.S. schools is proving to be a major educational boon.Investor's Daily, 1 & 32.
Choy, J. K. T. (1988, November). Technological innovation in Japan and the United States.The World & I, pp. 162–177.
Daniel, E. (1987). An examination of faculty and administrative knowledge workers and their major information support units. InCampus of the Future: Conference on Information Resources. OCLC Library, Information, and Computer Science Series, Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, pp. 35–58.
Dore, R. P. (1983). Good will and the spirit of market capitalism.The British Journal of Sociology, 34, 4.
Fiske, E. B. (1989, January 4). Lessons: retooling America's schools by shifting from the “factory floor model” to the power-sharing one.New York Times, Section B, p. 10.
Fransman, M. (1988). The Japanese system and the acquisition, assimilation and further development of technological knowledge: organization form, markets and government. In B. Elliott (Ed.),Technology and Social Process, pp. 111–130. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Freeman, C. (1984, August). Long waves of economic development. In Proceedings of the British Assn. for the Advancement of Science.New Technology and the Future of Work and Skills, pp. 602–616. London: Frances Pinter.
Freeman, C. (1988). Induced innovation, diffusion of innovations and business cycles. In B. Elliott (Ed.).Technology and Social Process, pp. 84–110. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gates, W. H. (1988, Spring). Computing then, now, and in the future: advanced graphics, networking, and CD-ROM.EDUCOM Bulletin, pp. 25–27.
Grayson, L. P. (1988, November). The educational challenge.The World & I, pp. 192–196.
Hardison, O. B., Jr. (1985). Education for Utopia. In L. H. Lapham (Ed.),High Technology and Human Freedom, pp. 41–47. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Kimball, R. (1982). A self-improving tutor for symbolic integration. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.),Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 283–307. New York: Academic Press.
Kondratiev, N. (1925). The major economic cycles.Voprosy Konjunktury, 1:28–79, Moscow.
Martino, J. (1983).Technological Forecasting for Decision Making. (Second Ed.). New York: North Holland.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983).A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Perez, C. (1983, October). Structural change and the assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems.Futures, 15(4), 357–375.
Plosia, W. H. (1986). A comprehensive and integrated model: Pennsylvania's Ben Franklin Partnership Programs. In D. O. Gray, T. Solomon, & W. Hetzner (Eds.).Technological Innovation—Strategies for a New Partnership, pp. 261–271. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Porter, A. L., Rossini, F. A., Carpenter, S. R., Roper, A. T., Larson, R. W., & Tiller, J. S. (1980).A Guidebook for Technology Assessment and Impact Analysis. New York: North Holland.
Rees, J., Briggs, R., & Hicks, H. (1985). New technology in the United States' machinery industry: trends and implications. In A. T Thwaites & R. P. Oakey (Eds.).The Regional Economic Impact of Technological Change, pp. 164–194. London: Francis Pinter.
Rubenstein, R. L. (1988, November). Global technological equalization.The World & I, pp. 206–213.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939).Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process (2 Vols.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Scully, J. (1988, Spring). The relationship between business and higher education: A perspective on the twenty-first century.EDUCOM Bulletin, pp. 20–24.
Souder, W. E. (1986). Research and development limited partnerships: An agenda for research on a new form of collaboration. In D. O. Gray, T. Solomon, & W. Hetzner (Eds.).Technological Innovation—Strategies for a New Partnership, pp. 289–301. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Warren, W. J. (1989, January 4). New movement seeks to replace rivalry in class with team spirit.The New York Times, p. 17.
Wells, S. (1989, January 4). Backers of school change turn to sociologists.New York Times, p. 17.
Winn, W. (1986, November). Trends and future directions in educational technology research from a North American perspective.Programmed Learning and Technology, 23(4), 346–355.
Wolfe, D. (1988). Socio-political contexts of technological change: Some conceptual models. In B. Elliott (Ed.),Technology and Social Process, pp. 131–151. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Razik, T.A., Nalbone, P.J. Implications of technological change for higher education reform. ETR&D 38, 65–76 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298249
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298249