Skip to main content
Log in

Online citation analysis

A methodological approach

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper investigates the online citation analysis possibilities and limitations. The following online processing tools: RANK, MAP, and TARGET, provided by Dialog, are incorporated in order to perform analyses of citations to and from isolated sets of documents as well as to carry out diachrone journal analyses. These, analyses imply further to determine journal impact factors of ISI journals. Measures of the scope of internationalisation of journals are proposed and demonstrated. By the combined application of the RANK and TARGET commands we demonstrate a hitherto overlooked possibility of working with bibliographic coupling online and mapping of scientific fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Hjortgaard Christensen, P. Ingwersen, Fundamental methodological issues of data set creation online for the analyses of research publications. In:Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for scientometrics and Informetrics. Rosary College. June 7–10, 1995. Medford NJ., 1995, 103–112.

  2. P. Ingwersen, F. Hjortgaard Christensen, Data set isolation for bibliometric online analyses of research publications: Fundamental methodological issues.Journal of the American Society for Information Science (in press).

  3. Searching DIALOG. The complete guide. Dialog Information Services, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, 1991.

  4. TARGET on DIALOG. A new way to search Dialog. A “how-to” guide. Dialog Information Services, Inc. Palo Alto, Ca, 1993.

  5. Get Results with the Dialog RANK command. Dialog Chronolog, 1993, February, 27–33.

  6. S. J. Bradley, P. Willett, F. E. Wood,A publication and citation analysis of the Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield, 1980–1990.Journal of Information Science, 18, (1992), 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Wissmann, Techniques of data retrieval for scientometric research in the ISI citation indexes.Journal of Information Science, 19 (1993), 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Rousseau,A Scientometric study of the scientific publications of LUC (Limburgs Universitair Centrum): Period 1981–1993. Limburgs Universitair Centrum. Diepenbeek, April 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun, World flash on basic research. Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985.Scientometrics, 16 (1989), 1–478.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pao, Miranda Lee, Multiple retrieval as quality filter. In;New Worlds in Information and Documentation. Ed. byJ. R. Alvarez-Ossorio, andB. G. Goedegebuure, FID, Den Haag, 1994, 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Egghe, R. Rousseau,Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier. Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Sivertsen, Når er et tidsskrift internasjonalt. In:Det vitenskapelige tidsskrift. Ed. byN. P. Gleditsch et al. TemaNord, Copenhagen, 1994, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. M. Kessler, Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers.American Documentation, 14 (1963), 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Hornemann,Targets relevansudregningsalgoritme: Master Thesis. Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Søvig Christensen,Citationsindeksering, citationssøgning og citationsanalyse: Master Thesis. Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Snow, TARGET for the Biomedical searcher.Online, 18, (1994), Nov/dec 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. M. Keen, How does Dialog's TARGET work.Online & CDROM Review, 18 (1994), 285–288.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Miller, Detecting duplicates: A searcher's dream come true.Online, (1990) July, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. P. Harter, T. E. Nisonger, A. Weng, Semantic relationships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44 (1993), 9, 543–552.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. P. F. Peters, R. R. Braam, A. F. J. van Raan, Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 (1995), 1, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Ingwersen, Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory.Journal of Documentation, 52 (1996), 1, 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. Glänzel, H. Czerwon, A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. in:Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Rosary College. June 7–10, 1995. Medford NJ., 1995, 167–176.

  23. C. F. Huber, SciSearch on STN: Unique features for sophisticated searching.Database, 18 (1995), April/May, 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, F.H., Ingwersen, P. Online citation analysis. Scientometrics 37, 39–62 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02093484

Keywords

Navigation