Abstract
We compared quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with respect to their ability to discriminate subjects with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. In 240 post-menopausal women (mean age 63.7±6.9 years) lateral spine radiographs (T4-L4) were reviewed for the presence of vertebral fracture. Using a semiquantitative technique to grade the severity of vertebral deformities, we classified fractures as mild, moderate or severe (grade 1 to 3, respectively). Postero-anterior DXA (PA-DXA) and lateral DXA (L-DXA) measurements (L2–4) as well as QCT measurements of the lumbar spine (T12-L3 or L1–14) were obtained in all women. Seventy-two women were diagnosed with at least one fracture, and of these 40 were graded as mild. Comparing normal women with fractured women, we found the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to be greatest for QCT (0.81), followed by L-DXA (0.72) and PA-DXA (0.65). The differences among all three techniques were significant. Comparing the normal women with women having only mild fractures, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.79, 0.73 and 0.63 for QCT, L-DXA and PA-DXA, respectively. Significant differences existed between QCT and PA-DXA as well as between L-DXA and PA-DXA. Logistic regression analysis also revealed the highest age-adjusted odds ratios for QCT (3.67; 2.25–5.97) while L-DXA and PA-DXA showed substantially lower odds ratios (2.00; 1.39–2.87, and 1.54; 1.11–2.15, respectively). We conclude that low bone density as measured by QCT, PA-DXA or L-DXA is significantly associated with the prevalence of vertebral fractures. Of the methods studied, QCT of trabecular bone offered the best discriminatory capability. L-DXA proved to be superior to PA-DXA in its diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in women with mild fracture. Mild vertebral fractures are associated with decreased spinal bone density and may be regarded as osteoporotic deformities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alhava E. Bone density measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;Suppl 49:S21–3.
Carter D, Hayes W. Bone compressive strength: the influence of the density and strain rate. Science 1976;194:1174–5.
Grampp S, Jergas M, Glüer CC, et al. Radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: current methods and perspectives. Radiol Clin North Am 1993;31:1133–45.
Ott S. Methods of determining bone mass. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6(Suppl 2):S71–5.
Mazess RB, Barden H, Ettinger M, Schultz E. Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1988;3:13–8.
Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC. Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin invest 1988;81:1804–9.
Ross PD, Davis JW, Vogel JM, Wasnich RD. A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1990;46:149–61.
Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures: the study of osteo-porotic fractures. Lancet 1993;341:72–5.
Heuck A, Block J, Gluer CC, Steiger P, Genant HK. Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models. J Bone Miner Res 1989;4:891–900.
Pacifici R, Rupich R, Griffin M, et al. Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:705–10.
Ross PD, Genant HK, Davis JW, Miller PD, Wasnich RD. Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:120–6.
Roh Y, Dequeker J, Mulier J. Bone mass in osteoarthritis, measured in vivo by photon absorption. J Bone J Surg [Am] 1974;56:587–91.
Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt M. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137–48.
Genant HK, Cann CE, Ettinger B, Gordan GS. Quantitative computed tomography of vertebral spongiosa: a sensitive method for detecting early bone loss after oophorectomy. Ann Intern Med 1982;97:699–705.
Genant HK, Cann CE, Pozzi-Mucelli RS, Kanter AS. Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography: clinical feasibility and normative data. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7:554.
Faulkner KG, Gluer CC, Grampp S, Genant HK. Cross calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:36–42.
Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA, et al. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:1000–11.
Faulkner KG. Quantitative computed tomography and finite element modeling to predict vertebral fractures. San Francisco: University of California, 1990.
Gallagher C, Goldgar D, Mahoney P, McGill J. Measurement of spine density in normal and osteoporotic subjects using computed tomography: relationship of spine density to fracture threshold and fracture index [abstract]. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:634–5.
Reinhold W, Genant HK, Reiser U, et al. Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement method. Radiology 1986;160:469–78.
Sambrook P, Barlett C, Evans R, et al. Measurements of lumbar spine bone mineral: a comparison of dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1985;58:621–4.
Guglielmi G, Grimston SK, Fischer KC, Pacifici R. Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual X-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology 1994;845–50.
Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al. Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial sekelton with aging. J Clin Invest 1981;67:328–35.
Ito M, Hayashi K, Yamada M, Uetani M, Nakamura T. Relationship of osteophytes to bone mineral density and spinal fracture in men. Radiology 1993;189:497–502.
Uebelhart D, Duboeuf F, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:525–31.
Lang P, Schmitz S, Steiger P, Genant H, Lateral dual X-ray absorptiometry of the spine: a comparison with AP dual x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Osteoporosis, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1990.
Finkelstein J, Cleary RL, Butler J, et al. A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;78:724–30.
Strause L, Bracker M, Saltman P, Sartoris D, Kerr E. A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual-absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmeno-pausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1989;45:288–91.
Garton MJ, Robertson EM, Gilbert FJ, Gomersall L, Reid DM. Can radiologists detect osteopenia on plain radiographs? Clin Radiol 1994;118:22.
Pødenphant J, Herss Nielsen V-A, Riis Bj, Gottfredsen A, Christiansen C. Bone mass, bone structure and vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients. Bone 1987;8:127–30.
Black DM, Cummings SR, Genant HK, et al. Axial bone mineral density predicts fractures in older women. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:S300.
Zemel MB, Linkswiler HM. Calcium metabolism in the young adult male as affected by levels and form of phosphorus intake and level of calcium intake. J Nutr 1981;111:315–24.
Nuti R, Martini G. Effects of age and menopause on bone density of entire skeleton and osteoporotic women. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:59–65.
Slosman DO, Rissoli R, Donath A, Bonjour J-P. Vertebral bone mineral density measured laterally by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis Int 1990;1:23–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, W., Glüer, C., Grampp, S. et al. Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: A comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporosis Int 5, 433–439 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626604
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626604