Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of analogical processes on learning and misrepresentation

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the facilitative effects of instructional analogies have been well-documented, research has ignored their potential role in the formation of domain-specific misconceptions. A model for predicting the likelihood of analogical misrepresentation is presented. The model assumes that two factors interact to influence the potential for misrepresentation: locus of generation (learner-generated or teacher-generated) and component analogical process (selection or mapping). The research reviewed provides support for the model's predictions that (a) selection difficulties increase the potential for misrepresentation under learner-generated conditions, and (b) mapping difficulties increase the potential for misrepresentation under teacher-generated conditions. Application of research findings with proportional analogies and analogical problem-solving to a systematic investigation of the effects of instructional and elaborative analogies is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T. (1970). The children's associative responding test: A possible alternative to group IQ tests.Journal of Educational Psychology 61: 340–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Wilson, A. F., White, C. S., and Willson, V. L. (1987). Effects of teacher training on children's analogical reasoning performance.Teaching and Teacher Education 3: 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., and Schustack, M. W. (1979). Effects of analogy to prior knowledge on memory for new information.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 565–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, A. C. (1987). The analogy theme in geography.Journal of Geography 86: 194–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlin, P. (1978). Piagetian operations in the comprehension, preference and production of metaphors. In Weizman, R., Brown, R., Levinson, P., and Taylor, P. (eds.),Piagetian Theory and the Helping Professions, Vol. 1, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, pp. 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachhuber, C. G., and Twombly, E. (1976). A magnetic analogue of an airfoil.Physics Teacher 14: 417–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, M., and Parkins, E. (1987). Visual representation in analogical problem solving.Memory and Cognition 15: 230–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billow, R. (1975). A cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension.Developmental Psychology 11: 415–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisanz, J., Bisanz, G., and LeFevre, J. (1984). Interpretation of instructions: A source of individual differences in analogical reasoning.Intelligence 8: 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromage, B., and Mayer, R. (1981). Relationship between what is remembered and creative problem-solving performance in science learning.Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 451–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J., and Echols, C. H. (1986). Young children's mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure.Cognitive Development 1: 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In Chipman, S., Segal, J., and Glaser, R. (eds.),Thinking and Learning Skills, Vol. 2, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 485–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavese, J. A. (1976). An analogue for the cell.American Biology Teacher 38: 108–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science 5: 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1988). Observed methods for generating analogies in scientific problem solving.Cognitive Science 12: 563–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisafi, M. A., and Brown, A. L. (1986). Analogical transfer in very young children: Combining two separately learned solutions to reach a goal.Child Development 57: 953–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, R. V., and Reigeluth, C. M. (1984). The use of analogies in written text.Instructional Science 13: 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Loache, J. S. (1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children.Science 238: 1556–1557.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Loache, J. S. (1989). The development of representation in young children. In Reese, H. W. (ed.),Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vesta, F. J. (1987). The cognitive movement and education. In Glover, J. A., and Ronning, R. R. (eds.),Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 203–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving.Psychological Monographs 58: No. 270.

  • Flavell, J. (1985).Cognitive Development, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. L., and Sherwood, R. D. (1983). Facilitating problem solving in high school chemistry.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde, I. B. (1986). Analogy of the child's seesaw.Journal of Chemical Education 63: 796–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, J., Kessler, D., and Gentile, P. (1969). Process of solving analogy items.Journal of Educational Psychology 60: 494–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1977). Children's performance on a spatial analogies task.Child Development 48: 1034–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1980).The structure of analogical models in science. Report No. 4451, Bolt, Baranek, and Newman, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science 7: 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1986). Evidence for a structure-mapping theory of analogy. University of Illinois Technical Report, University of Illinois, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift.Child Development 59: 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., and Gentner, D. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In Gentner, D., and Stevens, A. L. (eds.),Mental models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., and Stuart, P. (1983). Metaphor as structure-mapping: What develops. Report No. 5479, Bolt, Baranek, and Newman, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., and Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy.Cognitive Science 10: 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M., and Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology 12: 306–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M., and Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology 15: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., and Britton, B. K. (1984). Supporting readers' comprehension through effective text design.Educational Technology 24: 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., Parseghian, P., and Sallis, R. (1982). Developmental and individual differences in verbal analogical reasoning.Child Development 53: 550–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1983). Conceptual entities. In Gentner, D., and Stevens, A. L. (eds.),Mental Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardiman, P., Well, A., and Pollatsek, A. (1984). Usefulness of a balance model in understanding the mean.Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 792–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. A., and Henk, W. A. (1986). Understanding and remembering complex prose augmented by analogic and pictorial illustration.Journal of Reading Behavior 18: 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. A., and Tierney, R. J. (1982). Developing readers' knowledge through analogy.Reading Research Quarterly 17: 256–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., and Thagard, P. R. (1986).Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E., and Billman, D. (1984). Development of analogical problem-solving skills.Child Development 55: 2042–2055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J., and Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer.Memory and Cognition 15: 332–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J., and Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction.Cognitive Science 13: 295–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., and Piaget, J. (1958).The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, C. (1977). Problem solving with soap films.Physics Teacher 15: 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshua, S., and Dupin, J. J. (1987). Taking into account student conceptions in instructional strategy: An example in physics.Cognition and Instruction 4: 117–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, P. J., and Carpenter, R. L. (1974). An analysis of analogical reasoning in children.Child Development 45: 857–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licata, K. P. (1988). Chemistry is like a...Science Teacher 55: 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, M., and Wittrock, M. C. (1981). The teaching of reading comprehension according to the model of generative learning.Reading Research Quarterly 17: 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (1986). Science. In Dillon, R. F., and Sternberg, R. J. (eds.),Cognition and Instruction, Academic Press, New York, pp. 155–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunzer, E. (1965). Problems of formal reasoning in test situations. In Mussen, P. (ed.),Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 30: No. 100.

  • Mayer, R. E. (1975). Different problem-solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models.Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 725–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1983). What have we learned about increasing the meaningfulness of science prose?Science Education 67: 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1989a). Models for understanding.Review of Educational Research 59: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1989b). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific test.Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., and Bromage, B. (1980). Different recall protocols for technical texts due to advance organizers.Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1979). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In Ortony, A. (ed.),Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 202–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, T. J., and Stepich, D. A. (1987).Journal of Instructional Development 10: 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972).Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1982).Learning and Memory, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, L. A. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition 14: 510–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, R. (1956). Analogy in science.American Psychologist 11: 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A. (1980). Metaphor. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., and Brewer, W. F. (eds.),Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J., and Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process.Science Education 67: 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. (1985). Inductive reasoning ability. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.),Human Abilities: An Information Processing Approach, W. H. Freeman, New York, pp. 195–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. A. (1979). Analogy between thermodynamics and mechanics.American Journal of Physics 47: 488–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, M. H. (1982). A computer analogy for illustrating entropy concepts.Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 2: 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S., Ernst, G., and Banerji, R. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states.Cognitive Psychology 6: 436–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, J., and Lutz, K. (1976). Effect of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitudes.Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, F. (1979). The analogy between fluid flow and electric circuitry.Chemical Engineering Education 13: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13: 629–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 456–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roweton, W. E. (1979). Plants as “children” in introductory child psychology.Psychological Reports 45: 768–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J. M., and Cable, G. W. (1976). Illustrations, analogies, and facilitative transfer in prose learning.Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 205–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building block of cognition. In Spiro, R., Burton, B., and Brewer, W. F. (eds.),Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., and Norman, D. (1981). Analogical processes in learning. In Anderson, R. J. (ed.),Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, M. K., and Achenbach, T. M. (1974). The effects of four kinds of tutoring experience on associative responding.American Educational Research Journal, 11: 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L. (1982). The significance of knowledge: A synthesis of research related to schema theory. In Otto, W., and White S. (eds.),Reading Expository Material. Academic Press, New York, pp. 13–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. R. J. (1984). Instructing with analogies.Journal of Educational Psychology 76:513–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1923).The Nature of Intelligence and the Principles of Cognition, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, R., and Weisberg, R. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer.Memory and Cognition 14: 442–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., and Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconceptions in advanced knowledge acquisition. In Vosniadou, S., and Ortony, A. (eds.),Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 498–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning.Psychological Review 84: 353–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R., and Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies.Child Development 51: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., and Rifkin, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 27: 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. (1987). Educational-developmental psychology and school learning. In Liben, L. S. (ed.),Development and Learning: Conflict or Congruence? Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 133–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development.Review of Educational Research 57: 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., and Schommer, M. (1988). Explanatory analogies can help children acquire information from expository text.Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 524–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. S., and Alexander, P. A. (1984). Teaching analogical reasoning processes.Reading World 24: 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. (1979). The cognitive movement in instruction.Educational Researcher 8: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, W. A. (1980). Chem ed compacts.Journal of Chemical Education 57: 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, D. E., Desberg, P., and Marsh, G. (1985). Analogy strategies for improving word recognition in competent and learning-disabled readers.Reading Teacher 38: 412–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, K. B., and Di Vesta, F. J. (1990). Instructional analogies and conceptual misrepresentations.Journal of Educational Psychology (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zook, K.B. Effects of analogical processes on learning and misrepresentation. Educ Psychol Rev 3, 41–72 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323662

Key words

Navigation