Abstract
This paper concerns the question whether reflexives can have strict readings in VP-ellipsis. It is argued that the possibility for strict interpretation is determined by a syntactic factor: subordination of the elided clause relative to the antecedent clause facilitates strict interpretation, whereas coordination disfavors it. This contrast is shown to be predictable by theories of syntactic reconstruction which assume that a surface reflexive corresponds to a bound variable at the point of ellipsis reconstruction, and where the binder has scope over a subordinated ellipsis but not over a coordinated ellipsis. One possibility is that the binder is the reflexive itself, moved at LF. A further factor, namely the possibility of speakers reinterpreting the ellipsis as a deep anaphor, accounts for why strict readings are in fact weakly acceptable in coordinated ellipsis. Previous accounts of ellipsis and reflexives are evaluated in light of the new data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouchard, Denise: 1984,On the Content of Empty Categories, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chao, Wynn: 1987,On Ellipsis, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, published 1993 by Garland Publishing.
Chierchia, Gennaro and Sally McConnell-Ginet: 1990,Meaning and Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, Noam: 1986,Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger, New York.
Chomsky, Noam: 1993, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, in K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.),The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 1–52.
Dalrymple, Mary: 1991, ‘Against Syntactic Reconstruction’, Xerox technical report, Xerox-PARC, Palo Alto, Cal.
Dalrymple, Mary, Fernando Pereira, and Stuart Shieber: 1991, ‘Ellipis and Higher-Order Unification’,Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 399–452.
Evans, Gareth: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362.
Fiengo, Robert: 1977, ‘On Trace Theory’,Linguistic Inquiry 8, 35–81.
Fiengo, Robert and Robert May: 1994,Indices and Identity, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Grodzinsky, Yusef and Tanya Reinhart: 1993, ‘The Innateness of Binding and Coreference’,Linguistic Inquiry 24, 69–101.
Haïk, Isabelle: 1987, ‘Bound VPs That Need to Be’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 505–530.
Hamkamer, Jorge and Ivan Sag: 1976, ‘Deep and Surface Anaphora’,Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–426.
Heim, Irene: 1993, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation: A Reinterpretation of Reinhart's Approach’, SfS-Report 07-93, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Tübingen.
Hestvik, Arild: 1991, ‘Subjectless Binding Domains’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 455–496.
Hestvik, Arild: 1992, ‘Strict Reflexives and the Subordination Effect’, in S. Berman and A. Hestvik (eds.),Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereich 340, Bericht Nr. 29 (1992). Distributed by IBM Germany, Heidelberg.
Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle: 1993,From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Katada, Fusa: 1991, ‘The LF Representation of Anaphors’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 287–314.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa: 1991, ‘Copying Identity’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 497–536.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1991, ‘The Representation of Focus’, in A. v. Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.),Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
Lebeaux, David: 1983, ‘A Distributional Difference between Reciprocals and Reflexives’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 723–730.
Lebeaux, David: 1985, ‘Locality and Anaphoric Binding’,The Linguistic Review 4, 343–363
Lobeck, Ann: 1987,Syntactic Constraints on VP Ellipsis, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington. Distributed by IULC, Bloomington, Indiana.
Lobeck, Ann: 1992, ‘Licensing and Identification of Ellipted Categories in English’, in S. Berman and A. Hestvik (eds.),Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforchungsbereich 340, Bericht Nr. 29 (1992). Distributed by IBM Germany, Heidelberg.
May, Robert: 1985,Logical Form, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Partee, Barbara and Emmon Bach: 1984, ‘Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.),Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 99–130.
Pica, Pierre: 1987, ‘On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle’, in J. McDonough and B. Plunkett (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 17, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 483–499.
Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, ‘Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of the Anaphora Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47–88.
Reinhart, Tanya: 1991, ‘Non-Quantificational LF’, in A. Kasher (ed.),The Chomskyan Turn, Blackwell, Cambridge.
Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland: 1993, ‘Reflexivity’,Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657–720.
Rizzi, Luigi: 1990,Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rooth, Mats: 1985,Association with Focus, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Sag, Ivan: 1976,Deletion and Logical Form, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Distributed by IULC, Bloomington, Indiana.
Williams, Edwin: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’,Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–139.
Zagaona, Karen: 1988,Verb Phrase Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper, a longer version of which was distributed as Hestvik (1992), has benefited from presentations at the universities of Cologne, Oslo, Florida International University, UQAM, Tübingen, Stuttgart, SOAS and Oxford, and at the 1993 LSA meeting in Los Angeles. Thanks to Nick Asher, Steve Berman, Bob Fiengo, Hans Kamp, Robert May, Mats Rooth, Helle Sem, Arnim von Stechow, and the editors of this journal for useful commentary and discussion. This work was supported by grant SFB 340 (A5) from the German Science Foundation to the University of Stuttgart.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hestvik, A. Reflexives and ellipsis. Nat Lang Seman 3, 211–237 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249838
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249838