Abstract
The phoretic association betweenMacrocheles muscaedomesticae and flies that inhabited poultry manure in a poultry farm in Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia was studied. The effects of temperature, relative humidity and fly abundance on phoretic rates also were in vestigated.
The most abundant fly species found wasMusca domestica; Musca sorbens, Chrysomyia megacephala andOphyra chalcogaster were present in relatively large numbers.
Representatives of ten families of mites were found on collectedMu. domestica. The most common mite wasMa. muscaedomesticae (Macrochelidae), found on all four species of flies mentioned above. The highest infestation (2.0%) occurred onO. chalcogaster butMu. domestica had the highest average number infested (5.7).
The ventral part of the housefly's abdomen was the most common site of mite attachment. Usually only one mite was found attached per fly.
The highest phoretic rate recorded was 64.4Ma. muscaedomesticae per 1000Mu. domestica. There was no correlation between phoretic rates andMa. muscaedomesticae abundance, nor was relative humidity a factor. However, a positive correlation was recorded in this host species between phoretic rates and temperature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axtell, R.C., 1964. Phoretic relationship of some common manure-inhabiting Macrochelidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) to the house fly. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 57: 584–587.
Axtell, RC., 1966. Comparative toxicities of insecticides to house fly larvae andMacrocheles muscaedomesticae, a mite predator of the house fly. J. Econ. Entomol., 59: 1128–1130.
Bregetova, N.G. and Koroleva, E.V., 1960. Mites of the family Macrochelidae Vitchern 1930 in the fauna of the U.S.S.R. Parasitology, 56: 132–154.
Farish, D.J. and Axtell, R.C., 1971. Phoresy redefined and examined inMacrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acarina: Macrochelidae). Acarologia, 13: 16–28.
Filipponi, A., 1955. Sulla natura dell' associazione traMacrocheles muscaedomesticae e Musca domestica. Riv. Parasitol., 16: 83–102.
Jalil, M. and Rodriguez, J.G., 1970. Studies of behaviour ofMacrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acarina: Macrochelidae) with emphasis on its attraction to the house fly. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 63: 738–744.
Kinn, D.N., 1966. Predation by the mite,Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acarina: Macrochelidae), on three species of flies. J. Med. Entomol., 3: 155–158.
Krantz, G.W., 1978. A Manual of Acarology. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, 509 pp.
Pereira, C. and DeCastro, M.PP., 1947. Forese e partenogenese arrentoea em “Macrocheles muscaedomesticae” (Scopoli) (“Acarina: Macrochelidae”) e sua significacao ecologica. Arch. Inst. Biol., 18: 71–89.
Petrova, A.D., 1964. The part played by synanthropic flies in the spread of Macrochelidae Vitzt. Med. Parazitol. (Moskva)., 33: 553–557.
Schefler, W.C., 1984. Statistics for Health Professionals. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 302 pp.
Singh, P., McEllistrem, M.T. and Rodriguez, J.G., 1967. The response of some macrochelids (Macrocheles muscaedomesticae (Scopoli),M. merdarius (Berl.) andM. subbadius (Berl.) to temperature and humidity (Acarina: Macrochelidae). Acarologia, 9: 1–20.
Sychevskaya, V.I., 1964. Mites found on synantropic flies in Uzbekistan. Med. Parasitol., 33: 557–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper forms part of the Ph. D. thesis of the author submitted to the Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, in March 1988.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ho, T.M. Phoretic association betweenMacrocheles muscaedomesticae (Acari: Macrochelidae) and flies inhabiting poultry manure in Peninsular Malaysia. Exp Appl Acarol 10, 61–68 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193974
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193974