Skip to main content
Log in

The role of female movement in the sexual behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

NormalDrosophila melanogaster males rapidly react to changes in the mobility of mutantshibire ts females by performing less courtship when the females are paralyzed and by courting movingshibire ts females vigorously. Mutantoptomotor-blind males, which are unable to respond to certain horizontally moving patterns, sustain abnormally short courtship bouts when tested with normal females, almost never perform orientation, one of the courtship behaviors, and require more time to initiate copulation than normal males. These results suggest that males must perceive female movement to perform normal courtship and copulation. Normal females become stationary before copulation occurs. Normal males mate quickly in response to this change in female behavior, while blind males require more time to effect copulation, prolonging the time that the female remains stationary. Mutantsmellblind females, which do not respond to certain odors, continue to move during the time that they are courted by normal or blind males and also require more time to copulate, suggesting that females may stop moving before mating in response to olfactory cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aceves-Piña, E. O., and Quinn, W. G. (1979). Learning in normal and mutantDrosophila larvae.Science 206:93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averhoff, W. W., and Richardson, R. H. (1974). Pheromonal control of mating patterns inDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 4:207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastock, M., and Manning, A. (1955). The courtship ofDrosophila melanogaster.Behaviour 8:85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. (1973). Courtship processing inDrosophila melanogaster. II. An adaptation to selection for receptivity to wingless males.Anim. Behav. 21:349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. (1977). Behavioural role of the sexcombs inDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Behav. Genet. 7:349–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. (1979). The courtship tracking ofDrosophila melanogaster.Biol. Cybernet. 34:91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. (1980). The extent of visual control in the courtship tracking ofDrosophila melanogaster.Biol. Cybernet. 37:41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geer, B. W., and Green, M. M. (1962). Genotype, phenotype, and mating behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Am. Nat. 96:175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigliatti, T. A., Hall, L., Rosenbluth, R., and Suzuki, D. T. (1973) Temperature-sensitive mutations inDrosophila melanogaster. XIV. A selection of immobile adults.Mol. Gen. Genet. 120:107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossfield, J. (1968). The relative importance of wing utilization in light dependent courtship inDrosophila. Stud. Genet. IV. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6818, pp. 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C. (1977). Portions of the central nervous system controlling reproductive behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 7:291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C. (1978). Courtship among males due to a male-sterile mutation inDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 8:125–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C., Siegel, R. W., Tompkins, L., and Kyriacou, C. P. (1980). Neurogenetics of courtship inDrosophila.Stadler Symp. 12:43–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M., and Buchner, E. (1977). Role of retinula cell types in visual behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster.J. Comp. Physiol. A,117:127–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M., and Götz, K. G. (1975). The use of mutations for partial degradation of vision inDrosophila melanogaster.J. Comp. Physiol. A,98:217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M., Wonneberger, R., and Wolf, R. (1978). Optomotor-blindH31—aDrosophila mutant of the lobula plate giant neurons.J. Comp. Physiol. A 124:287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotta, Y., and Benzer, S. (1970). Genetic dissection of theDrosophila nervous system by means of mosaics.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 67:1156–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, C. P., Burnet, B., and Connolly, K. (1978). The behavioural basis of overdominance in competitive mating success at the ebony locus ofDrosophila melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 26:1195–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D., and Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic variations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst. Publ. 627.

  • Manning, A. (1967). The control of sexual receptivity in femaleDrosophila.Anim. Behav. 15:239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A. (1975). Effect of light on egg-laying rate and mating speed in phototactic strains ofDrosophila.Nature 258:712–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A., and Hanson, S. J. (1981). Multivariate analysis ofDrosophila courtship.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T. A., and Manning, M. (1980). Mating success of photoreceptor mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Neur. Biol. 29:276–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, R. S. (1918). The reactions to light and gravity inDrosophila and its mutants.J. Exp. Zool. 25:49–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, W. L. (1975). Mutations affecting the vision ofDrosophila melanogaster. In King, R. C. (ed.),Handbook of Genetics, Vol. 3, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, W. L., Grossfield, J., and White, N. V. (1969). Nonphototactic mutants in a study of vision ofDrosophila.Nature 222:351–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsker, W., and Doschek, E. (1979). On the role of light in the mating behavior ofDrosophila subobscura.Z. Naturforsch. 34c:1253–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R. W., and Hall, J. C. (1979). Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutantDrosophila.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:3430–3434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1952). Mating behavior within the genusDrosophila (Diptera).Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99:396–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1966). Drosophilid mating behaviour: The behaviour of decapitated females.Anim. Behav. 14:226–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T., and Hsu, T. C. (1950). The influence of light on the mating behavior of seven species of theDrosophila melanogaster species group.Evolution 4:316–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streisinger, G. (1948). Experiments on sexual isolation inDrosophila. IX. Behavior of males with etherized females.Evolution 2:187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., Hall, J. C., and Hall, L. M. (1980). Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutantDrosophila.J. Insect Physiol. 26:689–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venard, R., and Jallon, J. M. (1980). Evidence for an aphrodisiac pheromone of femaleDrosophila.Experientia 36:211–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant GM 21473 to J.C.H., who is also supported by U.S. Public Health Service Research Career Development Award GM00297.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tompkins, L., Gross, A.C., Hall, J.C. et al. The role of female movement in the sexual behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster . Behav Genet 12, 295–307 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067849

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067849

Key Words

Navigation