Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic pollution regulation

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines pollution regulation in a dynamic setting with complete information. We show that tradeable pollution permits may not achieve the social optimum even when the permit market is perfectly competitive. The reason is that the optimal tradeable permits regulation will typically be time inconsistent. We then show that pollution taxes can achieve the first best and are time consistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, William J. and Wallace E. Oates. 1988.The Theory of Environmental Policy, Second Edition. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, Peter and Clifford Russell. 1985. “Comparative Analysis of Alternative Policy Instruments.” InHandbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, edited by Allan Kneese and James Sweeney. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Partha, Peter Hammond, and Eric Maskin. 1980. “On Imperfect Information and Optimal Pollution Control.”Review of Economic Studies 47(5): 857–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, Paul B., and Lawrence J. White. 1986. “Innovation in Pollution Control.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13(1): 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, Paul B., and Lawrence J. White. 1990. “The Environment.”The Economist September 8, supplement.

  • Fudenberg, Drew, and Jean Tirole. 1991.Game Theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Robert W. 1989. “Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(2): 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, Finn, and Edward Prescott. 1977. “Rules Rather Than Discretion.”Journal of Political Economy 85: 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, Arun S. 1991. “Permanent Versus Interim Regulations: A Game-Theoretic Analysis.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21(2): 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman, Scott R., and Raymond Prince. 1989. “Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(3): 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Albert. 1984.Targeting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas C. 1960.The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spulber, Daniel F. 1986. “Optimal Environmental Regulation under Asymmetric Information.”Journal of Public Economics 35: 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, Tom. 1974. “The Design of Property Rights for Air Pollution Control.”Public Policy 22: 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, Tom. 1985.Emissions Trading. Washington DC: Resource for the Future.

  • Turnovsky, Stephen, and William Brock. 1980. “Time Consistency and Optimal Government Policies in Perfect Foresight Equilibrium.”Journal of Public Economics 13: 183–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, Martin. 1974. “Prices vs. Quantities.”Review of Economics Studies 41: 477–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank Claudio Mezzetti, Wally Oates, and Paul Rhode for helpful comments. The last two authors thank the National Science Foundation for financial support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biglaiser, G., Horowitz, J.K. & Quiggin, J. Dynamic pollution regulation. J Regul Econ 8, 33–44 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066598

Keywords

Navigation