Skip to main content
Log in

Differential association theory reconsidered: An extension and its empirical test

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1974 the German methodologist Karl-Dieter Opp expounded and expanded Sutherland's differential association theory. In this article an empirical test of this version of the theory is presented based on data for 1196 boys and girls in the age range 12 to 17 years. Furthermore, some new and additional theoretical specifications about the social influence of others on the individual, all in accordance with the original ideas of Sutherland, are proposed and empirically tested. The differential association theory according to the version of K.-D. Opp is fairly well corroborated by the data. Only three of the postulated relationships are rejected. The theory explains 51% of the variance of criminal behavior, even considering that no “criminal” population is used for the test and only minor offenses are measured. The test also shows that the impact of the frequency of contacts with deviant behavior patterns on the development of positive definitions and on the frequency of communication about relevant techniques is substantial and cannot be ignored by criminologists. Furthermore, special analyses show that several propositions favor the theory. It is the deviancy of others that has the most substantial impact: the more youngsters have contact with their friends, the stronger the impact of the deviancy of their friends on the development of positive definitions or on the frequency of communication about techniques. The tests also show that the more youngsters identify themselves with others, the stronger will be the impact of the deviancy of the others on their norms. These results support the modification of the DA theory according to Opp and falsify some propositions of social control theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, R. (1985). Social control theory and delinquency: A longitudinal test.Criminology 23: 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1981). De controletheorie van Travis Hirschi: toetsing van een causaal model. In Gunther Moor, L. G. H. (ed.),Grenzen van de jeugd, Ars Aequi Libri, Utrecht, pp. 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1983). De controletheorie voor het grote en het kleine verschil.Tijdschrift Criminol. 25: 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1984). De methode van zelfrapportage van delicten.Tijdschrift Criminol. 26: 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1985).Criminaliteit als sociaal leerproces. Een toetsing van de differentiëleassociatietheorie in de versie van K.-D. Opp, Gouda Quint, Arnhem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1988). Massale criminaliteit, jeugd en de overheid.Delikt Delinkwent. 18: 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1989). Scaling and reliability problems in self-reported property crimes. In Klein, M. W. (ed.),Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht, pp. 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1990). Schoolklaseffecten en crimineel gedrag: een multilevel-analyse van contextuele invloeden.Tijdschrift Criminol. 32: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N., and Zwanenburg, M. A. (1980).Deviante Socialisatie. Verslag van een pilot-study, Criminologisch Instituut, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, G. J. N., Jongman, R., and Junger-Tas, J. (eds). (1985).Maatschappelijke bindingen en criminaliteit, Boom, Meppel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. L., and Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association reinforcement theory of criminal behavior.Soc. Problems 14: 128–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., and Zeller, R. A. (1979).Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. A. (1959). Illegitimate means, anomie and deviant behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 24: 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, R. A., and Ohlin, L. E. (1960).Delinquency and Opportunity. A Theory of Delinquent Groups, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. K., Lindesmith, A. L., and Schuessler, K. (eds.) (1965).The Sutherland Papers, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (1964).Delinquency, Crime and Differential Association, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (1969). Epidemiology and individual conduct. In Cressey, D. R., and Ward, D. A. (eds.),Delinquency, Crime and Social Process, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 557–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (1972). Role theory, differential association and compulsive crimes. In Rose, A. M. (ed.),Human Behavior and Social Processes. An Interactionist Approach, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 443–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Fleur, M. L., and Quinney, R. (1966). A reformulation of Sutherland's differential association theory and a strategy for empirical validation.J. Res. Crime Deling. 3: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L. E., and Wilson, J. Q. (1986).Understanding and Controlling Crime, Toward a New Research Strategy, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiselier, J. P. S., and Verschuren, P. J. M. (1988). De differentiële associatietheorie als verklaring van crimineel gedrag.Tijdschrift Criminol. 30: 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylord, M. S., and Galliher, J. F. (1988).The Criminology of Edwin Sutherland, Transaction Books, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1969). Criminality theories and behavioral images. In Cressey, D. R. and Ward, D. (eds.),Delinquency, Crime and Social Process, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 515–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1978).Crime in our Changing Society, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S. (1956). Theory and fact in criminology: A criticism of differential association.Br. J. Delinq. 7: 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981).Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1986). On the comparability of rational choice and social control theories of crime. In Cornish, D. B., and Clarkle, R. V. (eds.),The Reasoning Criminal. Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, Springer Verlag, New York/Berlin, pp. 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M., (eds.) (1980).Understanding Crime. Current Theory and Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control.Am. J. Sociol. 81: 82–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F. (1972). Parents, peers and delinquent action: A test of the differential association perspective.Am. J. Sociol. 20: 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E. (1979).Juvenile Delinquency and Its Origins: An Integrated Theoretical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junger-Tas, J., and Block, R. L. (eds.) (1988).Juvenile Delinquency in the Netherlands, Kugler, Amstelveen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D., and Massey, J. L. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: An examination of the elements of the bond.Sociol. Q. 21: 529–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., and Sampson, R. J. (1991). The Sutherland-Glueck debate: On the sociology of criminological knowledge.Am. J. Sociol. 96: 1402–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., and Ball, R. A. (1989).Criminological Theory. Context and Consequences, Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory.Crime Delinq. 34: 277–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D., and Sykes, G. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 22: 664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K-D. (1974).Abweichendes Verhalten und Gesellschaftsstruktur, Luchterhand, Neuwied.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, J. H., and Wells, L. E. (1990). The effect of parental attachments and direct controls on delinquency.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 27: 140–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory.Am. J. Sociol. 94: 774–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severy, L. J. (1973). Exposure to deviance committed by valued peer group and family members.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 10: 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr. (1957). Differential association and delinquency.Soc. Problems 4: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr. (1958). Differential association with delinquent friends and delinquent behavior.Pacific Sociol. Rev. 1: 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F., Jr. (1960). Differential association as a hypothesis: Problems of empirical testing.Soc. Problems 8: 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, W. (1973).Kriminalitätstheorien und ihre Realitätsgehalt, Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, J. R. (1967). Differential identification and attitudes toward the law. Soc.Forces 46: 256–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1924).Criminology, Lippincott, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1934, 1939, 1947).Principles of Criminology, Lippincott, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1956). Development of a theory. In Cohen, A. K., Lindesmith, A. L., and Schuessler, K. (eds.),The Sutherland Papers, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 13–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1973).On Analyzing Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, H. L. (1964). Differential association and reported delinquent behavior: A replication.Soc. Problems 12: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiatrowski, M., and Anderson, K. (1987). The dimensionality of the social bond.J. Quant. Criminol. 3: 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., and Ferracuti, F. (1969).The Subculture of Violence, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruinsma, G.J.N. Differential association theory reconsidered: An extension and its empirical test. J Quant Criminol 8, 29–49 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062758

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062758

Key words

Navigation