Abstract
In 1974 the German methodologist Karl-Dieter Opp expounded and expanded Sutherland's differential association theory. In this article an empirical test of this version of the theory is presented based on data for 1196 boys and girls in the age range 12 to 17 years. Furthermore, some new and additional theoretical specifications about the social influence of others on the individual, all in accordance with the original ideas of Sutherland, are proposed and empirically tested. The differential association theory according to the version of K.-D. Opp is fairly well corroborated by the data. Only three of the postulated relationships are rejected. The theory explains 51% of the variance of criminal behavior, even considering that no “criminal” population is used for the test and only minor offenses are measured. The test also shows that the impact of the frequency of contacts with deviant behavior patterns on the development of positive definitions and on the frequency of communication about relevant techniques is substantial and cannot be ignored by criminologists. Furthermore, special analyses show that several propositions favor the theory. It is the deviancy of others that has the most substantial impact: the more youngsters have contact with their friends, the stronger the impact of the deviancy of their friends on the development of positive definitions or on the frequency of communication about techniques. The tests also show that the more youngsters identify themselves with others, the stronger will be the impact of the deviancy of the others on their norms. These results support the modification of the DA theory according to Opp and falsify some propositions of social control theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, R. (1985). Social control theory and delinquency: A longitudinal test.Criminology 23: 47–61.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1981). De controletheorie van Travis Hirschi: toetsing van een causaal model. In Gunther Moor, L. G. H. (ed.),Grenzen van de jeugd, Ars Aequi Libri, Utrecht, pp. 57–77.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1983). De controletheorie voor het grote en het kleine verschil.Tijdschrift Criminol. 25: 96–104.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1984). De methode van zelfrapportage van delicten.Tijdschrift Criminol. 26: 295–308.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1985).Criminaliteit als sociaal leerproces. Een toetsing van de differentiëleassociatietheorie in de versie van K.-D. Opp, Gouda Quint, Arnhem.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1988). Massale criminaliteit, jeugd en de overheid.Delikt Delinkwent. 18: 151–163.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1989). Scaling and reliability problems in self-reported property crimes. In Klein, M. W. (ed.),Cross-National Research in Self-Reported Crime and Delinquency, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht, pp. 131–151.
Bruinsma, G. J. N. (1990). Schoolklaseffecten en crimineel gedrag: een multilevel-analyse van contextuele invloeden.Tijdschrift Criminol. 32: 1–12.
Bruinsma, G. J. N., and Zwanenburg, M. A. (1980).Deviante Socialisatie. Verslag van een pilot-study, Criminologisch Instituut, Nijmegen.
Bruinsma, G. J. N., Jongman, R., and Junger-Tas, J. (eds). (1985).Maatschappelijke bindingen en criminaliteit, Boom, Meppel.
Burgess, R. L., and Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association reinforcement theory of criminal behavior.Soc. Problems 14: 128–147.
Carmines, E. G., and Zeller, R. A. (1979).Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Cloward, R. A. (1959). Illegitimate means, anomie and deviant behavior.Am. Sociol. Rev. 24: 49–59.
Cloward, R. A., and Ohlin, L. E. (1960).Delinquency and Opportunity. A Theory of Delinquent Groups, Free Press, New York.
Cohen, A. K., Lindesmith, A. L., and Schuessler, K. (eds.) (1965).The Sutherland Papers, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Cressey, D. R. (1964).Delinquency, Crime and Differential Association, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Cressey, D. R. (1969). Epidemiology and individual conduct. In Cressey, D. R., and Ward, D. A. (eds.),Delinquency, Crime and Social Process, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 557–577.
Cressey, D. R. (1972). Role theory, differential association and compulsive crimes. In Rose, A. M. (ed.),Human Behavior and Social Processes. An Interactionist Approach, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 443–467.
de Fleur, M. L., and Quinney, R. (1966). A reformulation of Sutherland's differential association theory and a strategy for empirical validation.J. Res. Crime Deling. 3: 1–22.
Farrington, D. P., Ohlin, L. E., and Wilson, J. Q. (1986).Understanding and Controlling Crime, Toward a New Research Strategy, Springer, New York.
Fiselier, J. P. S., and Verschuren, P. J. M. (1988). De differentiële associatietheorie als verklaring van crimineel gedrag.Tijdschrift Criminol. 30: 203–222.
Gaylord, M. S., and Galliher, J. F. (1988).The Criminology of Edwin Sutherland, Transaction Books, New Brunswick.
Glaser, D. (1969). Criminality theories and behavioral images. In Cressey, D. R. and Ward, D. (eds.),Delinquency, Crime and Social Process, Harper & Row, New York, pp. 515–530.
Glaser, D. (1978).Crime in our Changing Society, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Glueck, S. (1956). Theory and fact in criminology: A criticism of differential association.Br. J. Delinq. 7: 92–98.
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1981).Measuring Delinquency, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Hirschi, T. (1986). On the comparability of rational choice and social control theories of crime. In Cornish, D. B., and Clarkle, R. V. (eds.),The Reasoning Criminal. Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, Springer Verlag, New York/Berlin, pp. 105–118.
Hirschi, T., and Gottfredson, M., (eds.) (1980).Understanding Crime. Current Theory and Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control.Am. J. Sociol. 81: 82–108.
Jensen, G. F. (1972). Parents, peers and delinquent action: A test of the differential association perspective.Am. J. Sociol. 20: 84–103.
Johnson, R. E. (1979).Juvenile Delinquency and Its Origins: An Integrated Theoretical Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Junger-Tas, J., and Block, R. L. (eds.) (1988).Juvenile Delinquency in the Netherlands, Kugler, Amstelveen.
Krohn, M. D., and Massey, J. L. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: An examination of the elements of the bond.Sociol. Q. 21: 529–543.
Laub, J. H., and Sampson, R. J. (1991). The Sutherland-Glueck debate: On the sociology of criminological knowledge.Am. J. Sociol. 96: 1402–1440.
Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., and Ball, R. A. (1989).Criminological Theory. Context and Consequences, Sage, Newbury Park.
Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: A causal modeling approach.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 489–504.
Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory.Crime Delinq. 34: 277–306.
Matza, D., and Sykes, G. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.Am. J. Sociol. 22: 664–670.
Opp, K-D. (1974).Abweichendes Verhalten und Gesellschaftsstruktur, Luchterhand, Neuwied.
Rankin, J. H., and Wells, L. E. (1990). The effect of parental attachments and direct controls on delinquency.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 27: 140–165.
Sampson, R. J., and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory.Am. J. Sociol. 94: 774–802.
Severy, L. J. (1973). Exposure to deviance committed by valued peer group and family members.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 10: 35–46.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1957). Differential association and delinquency.Soc. Problems 4: 233–239.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1958). Differential association with delinquent friends and delinquent behavior.Pacific Sociol. Rev. 1: 20–25.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1960). Differential association as a hypothesis: Problems of empirical testing.Soc. Problems 8: 14–24.
Springer, W. (1973).Kriminalitätstheorien und ihre Realitätsgehalt, Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart.
Stratton, J. R. (1967). Differential identification and attitudes toward the law. Soc.Forces 46: 256–262.
Sutherland, E. H. (1924).Criminology, Lippincott, Chicago.
Sutherland, E. H. (1934, 1939, 1947).Principles of Criminology, Lippincott, Chicago.
Sutherland, E. H. (1956). Development of a theory. In Cohen, A. K., Lindesmith, A. L., and Schuessler, K. (eds.),The Sutherland Papers, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 13–59.
Sutherland, E. H. (1973).On Analyzing Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Voss, H. L. (1964). Differential association and reported delinquent behavior: A replication.Soc. Problems 12: 78–85.
Wiatrowski, M., and Anderson, K. (1987). The dimensionality of the social bond.J. Quant. Criminol. 3: 65–81.
Wolfgang, M. E., and Ferracuti, F. (1969).The Subculture of Violence, Tavistock, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruinsma, G.J.N. Differential association theory reconsidered: An extension and its empirical test. J Quant Criminol 8, 29–49 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062758
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062758