Skip to main content
Log in

Facilitated communication: A failure to replicate the phenomenon

  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-one subjects participated in a study of Biklen's and Crossley's hypothesis that persons with autism show unexpected literacy and improved communication ability through the process of facilitated communication (FC). Repeated measures of literacy were conducted at (a) a baseline test of communicative ability before FC; (b) a pretest with facilitation; and (c) a posttest with facilitation after 20 hours of training. At both the pretest and posttest, the facilitators were screened from hearing or seeing the questions or pictorial stimuli. Although some facilitators reported newfound communicative abilities during training sessions, no client showed unexpected literacy or communicative abilities when tested via the facilitator screening procedure, even after 20 hours of training. Separate analyses indicated that some facilitators influenced the communicative output of their clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis.Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D. (Producer). (1991). “I'm not autistic on the typewriter”: An introduction to facilitated communication [videotape]. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D. (1992). Autism orthodoxy versus free speech: A reply to Cummins and Prior.Harvard Educational Review, 62, 242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Gold, D., Berrigan, C., & Swaminathan, S. (1992). Facilitated communication: Implications for individuals with autism.Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Saha, S. N., Duncan, J., Gold, D., Hardardottir, M., Karna, E., O'Connor, S., & Rao, S. (1991). “I AMN NOT A UTISTIVC OH THEJE TYP” (“I'm not autistic on the typewriter”).Disability, Handicap, and Society, 6, 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, D., & Schubert, A. (1991). New words: The communication of students with autism.Remedial and Special Education, 12(6), 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruininks, R., Woodcock, R., Weatherman, R., & Hill, B. (1984).The Woodcock-Johnson scales of independent behavior. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calculator, S. N., & Singer, K. N. (1992). Preliminary validation of facilitated communication [Letter to the editor].Topics in Language Disorders, 12(5), ix-xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, R. (1988).Unexpected communication attainments by persons diagnosed as autistic and intellectually impaired. Caulfield, Australia: DEAL Communication Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, R. (1992). Getting the words out: Case studies in facilitated communication training.Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, R., & McDonald, A. (1980).Annie's coming out. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Prior, M. P. (1992). Autism and assisted communication: A response to Biklen.Harvard Educational Review, 62, 228–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. F. (1990).Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test-Revised. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, A., Melita, B., & Arnold, N. (1993). A case study assessing the validity of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D. (1992, Fall). My son's “private consultation” [Letter to the editor].The Advocate, p. 16.

  • Jacobson, J. W., Eberlin, M. Mulick, J. A., Schwartz, A. A., Szempruch, J., & Wheeler, D. L. (in press). Autism, facilitated communication, and future directions. In J. L. Matson (Ed.)Children and adults with autism: Etiology, assessment, and intervention. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.

  • Jacobson, J. W., & Mulick, J. A. (1992). Speak for your self, or ... I can't quite put my finger on it!Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 17(3), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarushka, M. (1991, October 6). The words they can't say.The New York Times (Sunday Magazine Section), pp. 33, 36, 70.

  • Meecham, M. (1971).The Verbal Language Development Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (Ed.). (1991).Facilitated communication resource guide. (Available from the Adriana Foundation, Brookline, MA).

  • Schopler, E. (1992). Editorial commentary.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 22, 337–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. C. (1988).The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, J. (1992, September 21). Horror Story or Big Hoax?Newsweek, p. 75.

  • Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D. A., & Cichetti, D. V. (1985).Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staff. (1991, Spring). “Ask the Experts” talks with Douglas Biklen.The Advocate, pp. 8–10.

  • Szempruch, J., & Jacobson, J. W. (in press). Evaluating the facilitated communications of people with developmental disabilities.Research in Developmental Disabilities.

  • Thorndike, R., Hagen, E., & Sattler, J. (1986).The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Chicago: Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D. L., Jacobson, J. W., Paglieri, R. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication.Mental Retardation, 31 (1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful for the support and assistance of Martin Hamburg, John Werner, Mike DeFalco, our facilitators, the students who participated in this project, and John Amato. Special thanks to John Pomeroy, consulting psychiatrist, who provided the independent diagnoses on our subjects for the assessment of diagnostic reliability, and to Sarah Robinson for helpful comments in editing an earlier draft. We are also indebted to Canon, USA, for donating three Canon Communicators.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eberlin, M., McConnachie, G., Ibel, S. et al. Facilitated communication: A failure to replicate the phenomenon. J Autism Dev Disord 23, 507–530 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046053

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046053

Keywords

Navigation