Skip to main content
Log in

Reading and spelling acquisition in two different teaching methods: A test of the independence hypothesis

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of word reading and word spelling was examined in French speaking children initially instructed either by a phonic or a whole-word method. Second, fourth and sixth graders were administered to reading and spelling tests in which grapho-phonological regularity, frequency, length and lexicality were manipulated. The results showed that in both curricula, reading and spelling acquisition can be characterized by a parallel increase in the use of sub-lexical correspondences and in the reliance on word-specific information. Contrary to a simple view of lexical development according to which the use of analytical knowledge and the use of word-specific knowledge correspond to two different cognitive processes that develop independently from each other, whole-word children did not appear to rely more on whole-word knowledge. On the contrary, and paradoxically, grade 2 whole-word children tended to use analytical correspondences to a greater extent than their peers. In later development, reading matched phonic and whole-word groups did not differ from each other. It is argued that the results support the hypothesis that the acquisition of sub-lexical correspondences constitutes a necessary step in the acquisition of reading and spelling. We conclude that the analytic comparison of different curricula provides a naturalistic tool for the study of the dynamics of development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990).Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alegria, J., Pignot, E. & Morais, J. (1982). Phonetic analysis of speech and memory codes in beginning readers,Memory & Cognition 10: 451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman, J., Bruck, M., Hebert, M. & Seidenberg, M. (1984). Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 114–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1979). Orthographic and word-specific mechanisms in children's reading of words,Child Development 50: 60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. & Treiman, R. (1980). Use of orthography in reading and learning to read. In: J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia (pp. 171–189). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. (1975). The effect of instruction on pupils' reading strategies,Reading Research Quarterly 4: 555–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (1970). The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read,Reading Research Quarterly 6: 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A. & Loosemore, R. P. W. (1994). Computational approaches to normal and impaired spelling. In: G. D. A. Brown & N. E. Ellis (eds.),Handbook of spelling (pp. 319–337). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M. & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: the case of initial consonant clusters,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50: 156–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics,Cognition 24: 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., Freebody, P. & Gates, A. (1991). Relationships between word-reading strategies and comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness: Longitudinal data,Reading Research Quarterly 27: 140–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S. (1967).Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S. (1979). The great debate: ten years later, with a modest proposal for reading stages. In: L. B. Resnick & P. L. Weaver (eds.),Theory and practice of early reading, Vol. 1 (pp. 29–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In: G. Underwood (ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P. & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches,Psychological Review 100: 589–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Content, A. (1984). L'analyse phonétique explicite de la parole et l'acquisition de la lecture,L'année psychologique 84: 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Content, A. (1990). L'acquisition de la lecture: approche cognitive,La lecture: difficultés spécifiques d'acquisition, Cahiers du Département des Langues et des Sciences du Langage 9: 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Content, A. (1991). The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French,Psychological Research 53: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Content, A., Morais, J., Alegria, J. & Bertelson, P. (1986). Acquisition de la lecture et analyse segmentale de la parole,Psychologica Belgica 26: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Content, A. & Peereman, R. (1992). Single and multiple process models of print to speech conversion. In: J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junça de Morais & M. Radeau (eds.),Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 213–239). Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. W. (1984).Reading, writing and dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A. & Carr, T. H. (1985). Cognitive abilities, conditions of learning, and the early development of reading skill,Reading Research Quarterly 20: 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dylexia. In: K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (eds.),Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–370). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. G. & Walsh, M. A. (1992). Chinese, phoenicians and the orthographic cipher of English. In: S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (eds.),Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 199–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbs, P. (1971).Ltudes statistiques sur le vocabulaire français. Dictionnaire des fréquences. Vocabulaire littéraire des XIXe et XXe siècles. Centre de recherche pour un Trésor de la langue française (CNRS), Nancy. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. S. & Thompson, G. B. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in children's reading a product of instructional approach?,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 48: 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A. F. & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition,Applied Psycholinguistics 4: 103–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leybaert, J. & Alegria, J. (1995). Spelling development in deaf and hearing children: Evidence for use of morpho-phonological regularities in French,Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 7: 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fisher, W. F. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C. & Fisher, W. F. (1977). Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In: A. S. Reber & D. A. Scarborough (eds.),Towards a psychology of reading (pp. 207–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobrot, M. (1973).Lire. Paris: ESF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G., Friedman, M. P., Desberg, P. & Welch, V. (1980). Development of strategies in learning to spell. In: U. Frith (ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 339–353). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V. & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental theory of reading acquisition. In: Waller & McKinnon (eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 3 (pp. 199–227). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1984). Toward a rational taxonomy of the developmental dyslexias. In: R. N. Malatesha & H. A. Whitaker (eds.),Dyslexia: A global issue (pp. 45–58). The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J., Laxon, V. & Stuart, M. (1992). Beginning reading with phonology,British Journal of Psychology 83: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H. & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sub-lexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18: 452–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J., Alegria, J. & Content, A. (1987). The relationships between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view,Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 7: 415–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1980). The logogen model and orthographic structure. In: U. Frith (ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 117–135). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. E. & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In: K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (eds.),Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 15–34). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peereman, R. & Content, A. (1993). The neighborhood size effect in naming words and pseudowords,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition (in press).

  • Perfetti, C., Beck, I. & Hughes, C. (1981). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read. Communication presented to the A.S.R.C.D., Boston.

  • Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming,Psychological Review 96: 523–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M., Waters, G., Barnes, M. & Tanenhaus, M. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 23: 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K. (1986).Cognitive analysis of dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K. (1987a). Individual cognitive analysis of competent and impaired reading,British Journal of Psychology 78: 483–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K. (1987b). Developmental dyslexia: a cognitive experimental analysis. In: M. Coltheart, G. Sartori & R. Job (eds.),The cognitive neuropsychology of language (pp. 351–395). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. & Elder, L. (1986). Beginning reading without phonology,Cognitive Neuropsychology 3: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K. & Evans, H. M. (1994). Levels of phonological awareness and learning to read,Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 6: 221–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. & MacGregor, C. (1984). Development dyslexia: a cognitive experimental analysis of phonological, morphemic and visual impairments,Cognitive Neuropsychology 1: 43–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, M. & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages?,Cognition 30: 139–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. B. & Johnston, R. S. (1992). The effects of type of instruction on processes of reading acquisition. In: G. B. Thompson, W. E. Tunmer & T. Nicholson (eds.),Reading acquisition processes (pp. 74–90). Avon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1984). Individual differences among children in spelling and reading styles,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 37: 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Véronis, J. (1986). Etude quantitative sur le système graphique et phono-graphique du français,European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology 6: 501–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., Bruck, M. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words?,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39: 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., Bruck, M. M. & Malus-Abramowitz, M. (1988). The role of linguistic and visual information in spelling: a developmental study,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 45: 400–421.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Leybaert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leybaert, J., Content, A. Reading and spelling acquisition in two different teaching methods: A test of the independence hypothesis. Read Writ 7, 65–88 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026948

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026948

Key words

Navigation