Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of desire for control and extrinsic rewards on the illusion of control and gambling

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of individual differences in the desire to control events in an “illusion of control” situation was examined. Subjects high and low in the desire for control played several trials of a gambling game under conditions either facilitating or not facilitating the perception that the subject had control over the outcome of the game. Half of the subjects were allowed to trade their winnings in on prizes at the end of the experiment. The other half played the game without extrinsic incentives. It was found that high desire-for-control subjects were more susceptible to the illusion of control, but only when the winnings could be traded in on prizes. Desire for control level and illusion of control manipulations did not appear to affect betting behavior in the absence of extrinsic rewards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1978,87 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unified theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergler, E.The psychology of gambling. London: International Universities Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M.Effectance motivation and the overjustification effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, 1981.

  • Burger, J. M., & Arkin, R. M. Prediction, control and learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980,38 482–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. The desirability of control.Motivation and Emotion 1979,3 381–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M., & Vartabedian, R. A. Desire for control and reaction to proattitudinal and counterattitudinal arguments.Motivation and Emotion 1980,4 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L.Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallick-Kaufmann, M. The micro and macro dimensions of gambling in the United States.Journal of Social Issues 1979,35 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusyszyn, I. How gambling saved me from a misspent sabbatical.Journal of Humanistic Psychology 1977,17 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,32 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. “Superstition” in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1948,38 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, L. H., Lewicki, R. H., & Katz, A. M. Temporal orientation and perceived control as determinants of risk-taking.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1966,2 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, C. B. Causal attributions and personal control. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.),New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burger, J.M., Schnerring, D.A. The effects of desire for control and extrinsic rewards on the illusion of control and gambling. Motiv Emot 6, 329–335 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998189

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998189

Keywords

Navigation