Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty measures and uncertainty relations for angle observables

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainty measures must not depend on the choice of origin of the measurement scale; it is therefore argued that quantum-mechanical uncertainty relations, too, should remain invariant under changes of origin. These points have often been neglected in dealing with angle observables. Known measures of location and uncertainty for angles are surveyed. The angle variance angv {ø} is defined and discussed. It is particularly suited to the needs of quantum theory, because of its affinity to the Hilbert space metric, and its use of the basic sine and cosine operators. Corresponding uncertainty relations involving azimuthal or phase angles are indicated, and their relevance to study and definition of coherent states is briefly reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. von Mises,Phys. Z. 19, 490 (1918).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Kendall and A. Stuart,The Advanced Theory of Statistics (Griffin, London, 1977), Vol. 1, 4th edn., Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. G. Kendall and W. R. Buckland, eds.,A Dictionary of Statistical Terms (Oliver and Boyd, London, 1960), 2nd edn.; see article entitled “Dispersion.”

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Pólya,Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 1, 117 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Lévy,Bull. Soc. Math. France 67, 1 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Breitenberger,Biometrika 50, 81 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Deutsch,Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 631 (1983); M. H. Partovi,Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1883 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Jammer,The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. V. Mardia,Statistics of Directional Data (Academic Press, New York, 1972); E. Batschelet,Circular Statistics in Biology (Academic Press, New York, 1981); G. S. Watson,Statistics on Spheres (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Judge,Phys. Lett. 5, 189 (1963);Nuovo Cimento 31, 332 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Bouten, N. Maene, and P. van Leuven,Nuovo Cimento 37, 1119 (1965); A. A. Evett and H. M. Mahmoud,Nuovo Cimento 38, 295 (1965); L. Schotsmans and P. van Leuven,Nuovo Cimento 39, 776 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Breitenberger, Colloquium at the Department of Statistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 11 November, 1968.

  14. H. Gerhardt, U. Büchler, and G. Litfin,Phys. Lett. A 49, 119 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. M. Nieto,Phys. Lett. A 60, 401 (1977); J.-M. Lévy-Leblond,Phys. Lett. A 64, 159 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Silvert,Phys. Rev. D 2, 633 (1970), Eq. (UR3).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto,Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 387 (1965), Eq. (8).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto,Revs. Mod. Phys. 40, 411 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Jackiw,J. Math. Phys. (N. Y.)9, 339 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.-M. Lévy-Leblond,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)101, 319 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. P. Robertson,Phys. Rev. 34, 163 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Schrödinger,Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Phys.-Math. K1. 1930, 296.

  23. E. R. Davidson,J. Chem. Phys. 42, 1461 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Kraus,Z. Phys. 188, 374 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, and G. Pólya,Inequalities, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 1952); N. D. Kazarinoff,Analytic Inequalities (Holt, New York, 1961); E. F. Beckenbach and R. Bellmann,Inequalities (Springer, Berlin, 1961); D. S. Mitrinović,Analytic Inequalities (Springer, Berlin, 1970); J. Duvant and J. L. Lions,Sur les inéquations en mécanique et physique (Dunod, Paris, 1972); A. W. Marshall and I. Olkin,Inequalities (Academic Press, New York, 1979).

  26. W. Heisenberg,Die physikalischen Prinzipien der Quantentheorie (Hirzel, Leipzig, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  27. W. H. Louisell,Phys. Lett. 7, 60 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  28. L. Susskind and J. Glogower,Physics 1, 49 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. C. Lerner,Nuovo Cimento B 56, 183 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Aharonov, D. Falkoff, E. Lerner, and H. Pendleton,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)39, 498 (1966); H. S. Perlman and G. J. Troup,Am. J. Phys. 37, 1060 (1969); Y. Aharonov, E. C. Lerner, H. W. Huang, and J. M. Knight,J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)14, 746 (1973); S. Ruschin and J. Zak,Phys. Rev. A 20, 1260 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. Leaf,J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)10, 1980 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. G. Tillmann,Acta Sci. Math. 24, 258 (1963); K. Kraus,Z. Phys. 201, 134 (1967); J. C. Garrison and J. Wong,J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)11, 2242 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. Jordan,Z. Phys. 44, 1 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Schrödinger,Naturwissenschaften 14, 664 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. J. Glauber,Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto,Am. J. Phys. 33, 537 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Aragone, E. Chalbaud, and S. Salamó,J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)17, 1963 (1976); P. Gulshani,Can. J. Phys. 57, 998 (1979); V. P. Gutschick, M. M. Nieto, and F. Baker,Am. J. Phys. 47, 755 (1979); J. H. Marburger and E. A. Power,Found. Phys. 10, 865 (1980); J. K. Sharma, C. L. Mehta, N. Mukunda, and E. C. G. Sudarshan,J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)22, 78 (1981); D. F. Walls,Nature (London)306, 141 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. R. Klauder, “Continuous Representations and Path Integrals, Revisited,” inPath Integrals, G. J. Papadopoulos and J. T. Devreese, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1978);Phys. Rev. D 19, 2349 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. G. Yaffe,Revs. Mod. Phys. 54, 407 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. T. Epstein,Am. J. Phys. 27, 291 (1959); S. M. Roy and V. Singh,Phys. Rev. D 25, 3414 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. M. Nieto and L. M. Simmons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 207 (1978);Phys. Rev. A 19, 438 (1979);Phys. Rev. D 20, 1321, 1332, 1342 (1979); M. M. Nieto,Phys. Rev. D 22, 391 (1980); V. P. Gutschick and M. M. Nieto,Phys. Rev. D 22, 403 (1980); M. M. Nieto, L. M. Simmons, and V. P. Gutschick,Phys. Rev. D 23, 927 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. G. Hartley and J. R. Ray,Phys. Rev. D 25, 382 (1982); J. R. Ray,Phys. Rev. D 25, 3417 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. Ghosh and R. W. Hasse,Phys. Rev. A 24, 1621 (1981); T. Toyoda and K. Wildermuth,Phys. Rev. A 27, 1790 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Ehrmann,Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 32, 307 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. M. Nieto and V. P. Gutschick,Phys. Rev. D 23, 922 (1981); G. Ghosh and R. W. Hasse,Phys. Rev. D 24, 1027 (1981); M. M. Nieto,Phys. Rev. D 24, 1030 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. R. Klauder,Acta Phys. Aust., Suppl. 22, 3 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. R. Klauder and I. Daubechies,Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 117 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breitenberger, E. Uncertainty measures and uncertainty relations for angle observables. Found Phys 15, 353–364 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00737323

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00737323

Keywords

Navigation