Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validity and reliability of the Spanish Version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) was adapted for use in Spain. The American version was translated and back-translated independently by three bilinguals and the comprehensibility of a consensuated version was tested in a pilot study. The construct validity and internal consistency of the questionnaire were tested in 104 patients (52 high blood pressure patients attending a primary health care centre and 52 end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis). Concurrently to the PGWBI, patients were administered the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and three psychosocial categories of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP-PD). Patients in the dialysis group were administered the PGWBI on two occasions, two weeks apart. The PGWBI was moderately to highly correlated with the GHQ-12 (r=-0.71) and with the SIP-PD (r=-0.69). Overall internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.94. By dimensions, PGWBI α coefficients ranged from 0.56 (Self-control) to 0.88 (Anxiety). No differences were found in mean PGWBI scores between the two groups of patients studied. Two-week test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76. the similarity of the operating characteristics supports the contention that the Spanish and American versions of the PGWBI are conceptually equivalent. More research is needed on the reliability and responsiveness of the different dimensions of the questionnaire. Our results suggest that only global scores should be used when making individual comparisons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guyatt GH, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten SJO, Fenny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: A taxonomy and review. Can Med Assoc J 1982; 140: 1141–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cella DF, Wiklund I, Shumaker SA, Aaronson NK. Integrating health-related quality of life into cross-national clinical trials. Qual Life Res 1994; 2: 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hui C, Triandis HC. Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison strategies. Cross Cult Psychol 1985; 16: 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alonso J, Anto JM, Moreno C. Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: translation and preliminary validity. Am J Public Health 1990; 80: 704–708.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Badia X, Alonso J. Re-scaling the Spanish version of the Sickness Impact Profile: an opportunity to assess cross-cultural differences. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 949–957.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey: un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos [The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey: a tool for the assessment of clinical out-comes]. Med Clín (Barc.) 1995; 104: 771–776.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dupuy HJ. Self-representations of general psychological well-being of American adults. American Public Health Association Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, October 17, 1978.

  8. Dupuy HJ. The psychological general well-being (PGWB) index. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Fuberg CP, eds. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: Le Jacq, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fazio AF. Concurrent validation study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule. Hyattsville, Maryland: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Vital and Health Statistics Series, 2, no. 73, DHEW Publication no. (HRA) 78–1347, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ware JE Jr, Johnston SA, Davies-Avery A, Brook RH. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the Health Insurance Study. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation, Publication no. R-1987/3-HEW, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brook RH, Ware JE Jr, Davies-Avery A, Stewart AL, Donald CA. Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand's Health Insurance Study. Med Care 1979; 17: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simpkins C, Burke FF. Comparative analyses of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule: response distributions, community vs. patient status discriminations, and content relationships. Nashville, Tennessee: Center for Community Studies, Georg Peabody College, Contract no. HRA 106-74-13), 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Monk M. Blood pressure awareness and psychological well-being in the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Clin Invest Med 1981; 4: 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKenna SP, Hunt SM, Tennant A. Psychological well-being in depressed patients. Int J Meth Psy Res 1993; 3: 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, Brown B, Bulpitt CJ, Jenkins D. The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1657–1664.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Croog SH, Kong BW, Levine S, Weir MR, Baume RM, Saunders E. Hypertensive black men and women. Quality of life and effects of antihypertensive medications. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150; 1733–1741.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher AE, Bulpitt CJ, Chase DM, Collins WCJ, Furmerg CD, Goggin TK. Quality of life with three antihypertensive treatments: cilazapril, atenolol, nifedipine. Hypertension 1992; 19: 499–507.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steiner SS, Friedhoff AJ, Wilson BL, Wecker JR, Santos JP. Antihypertensive therapy and quality of life: a comparison of atenolol, captopril, enalapril and propranolol. Hum Hypertens 1990; 4: 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Applegate WB, Phillips HL, Schnapper H, Shepherd AMM, Schocken D, Luhr JC. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of three antihypertensive agents on blood pressure control and quality of life in older women. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 1817–1823.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brislin RW. Back translation and cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol 1970; 1: 185–216.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt SM, Alonso J, Bucquet D, Niero M, wiklund I, McKenna S. Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. Health Policy 1991; 19: 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Joint National Committee. The fifth report on the Joint National Committee on the detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Washington, DC.: National Institutes of Health, Publication no. 93-1088, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alonso J, Antó JM. Enquesta de Salut de Barcelona 1986. Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg DP. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley monograph no. 21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bergner M, Bobitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final version health status measurement. Med Care 1981; 19: 787–805.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lobo A, Pérez=Acheverría MJ, Artal J. Validity of the scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a Spanish population. Psychol Med 1986; 16: 135–40.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Badia X, Alonso J. Adaptación de una medida de la disfunción relacionada con la enfermedad: la versión española del Sickness Impact Profile. [Adaptation of a measure of disease-related dysfunction: the Spanish version of the Sickness Impact Profile.] Med Clin (Barc) 1994; 102: 90–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Badia X, Alonso J. Validity and reproducibility of the Spanish version of the Sickness Impact Profile. J Clin Epidemiol (in press).

  30. Bravo G, Potvin L. Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's alpha or the interclass correlation coefficient: toward the integration of two traditions. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 381–390.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wiklund I, Karlberg J. Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials. Selecting quality-of-life measures. Control clin Trials 1990; 12: 204s-216s.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Edwards DW, Yarvis RM, Mueller DP, Zingale HC, Wagman WJ. Test-taking and the stability of adjustment scales: can we assess patient deterioration? Evaluation Q 1978; 2: 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hjemdahl P, Wiklund I. Quality of life on anti-hypertensive drug therapy: scientific end-point or marketing exercise? J Hypertension 1992; 10: 1437–1446.

    Google Scholar 

  35. McGauley GA. Quality of life assessment before and after growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Acta Pediatr Scand 1989; 356: 70s-72s.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Naughton MJ, Miklund I. A critical review of dimension specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 397–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain

    X. Badia & J. Alonso

  2. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Institut Universitari de Salut Pùblica de Catalunya, Sarcelona, Spain

    X. Badia

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain

    F. Gutiérrez

  4. Deprtment of Public Health and Health Care Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    I. Wiklund

  5. Department of Behavicural Medicine, Astra Hässle, Sweden

    I. Wiklund

Authors
  1. X. Badia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Gutiérrez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Wiklund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This project was funded by Laboratorios ASTRA España SA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badia, X., Gutiérrez, F., Wiklund, I. et al. Validity and reliability of the Spanish Version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index. Qual Life Res 5, 101–108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435974

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435974

Key words

Search

Navigation