Skip to main content
Log in

Dopamine-sensitive alternation and collateral behaviour in a Y-maze: Effects of d-amphetamine and haloperidol

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The degree of alternation of arm choice in a Y-maze was examined on 15-min tests over 4 days in rats treated (IP) with saline, amphetamine (0.5 or 2.0 mg/kg) or pretreated with haloperidol (0.08 mg/kg) in each condition prior to test. On day 1 amphetamine-treated animals chose arms at random, but from day 2–4 those receiving the higher dose perseverated their choice. Controls maintained alternation. These effects could be prevented by haloperidol pretreatment. Amphetamine treatment increased the frequency of rearing at the middle, choice-point of the maze more than at the end of an arm. The increase at the mid-point was suppressed by haloperidol pretreatment from day 1 and at the end of an arm from day 2. Amphetamine induced an increase in head-turning/“looking” that was suppressed by haloperidol from day 2. The effect of haloperidol in increasing the duration of an item of looking or rearing at the end of an arm also started later in testing. Two effects are postulated to have occurred: (i) a conflict on day 1 between novelty-controlled sensory or attentional effects that leads to an alternation of arm choice and amphetamine-induced dopaminergic activity that facilitates an alternation of behavioural responses. The result was random choice and increased rearing at the choice point. (ii) On days 2–4 the drug-induced effects on switching motor responses came to control behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adkins J, Packwood JW, Marshall GL (1969) Spontaneous alternation and d-amphetamine. Psychonom Sci 17:167–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent DE (1971) Decision and Stress. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton PL (1963) Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behaviour by the brain. Psychol Rev 70:19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Clody DE, Carlton PL (1969) Behavioral effects of lesions of the medial septum of cats. Physiol Psychol 67:344–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Cools AR, Van Rossum JM (1980) Minireview: Multiple receptors for brain dopamine in behavior regulation: concept of dopamine-E and dopamine-I receptors. Life Sci 27:1237–1253

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalland T (1970) Response and stimulus perseveration in rats with septal and dorsal hippocampal lesions. J Comp Physiol Psychol 71:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Dember WM (1961) Alternation behavior. In: Fiske DW, Meddi SR (eds) Functions of varied experience. Dorsey, Homewood Ill, pp 227–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis W (1939) Spontaneous alternation in rats as an indicator of the persistence of stimulus effects. J Comp Psychol 28:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas RJ (1966) Cues for spontaneous alternation. J Comp Physiol Psychol 62:171–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas RJ (1972) Pavlovian conditioning and the brain. In: Boakes RA, Halliday MS (eds) Inhibition and Learning. Academic Press, London, pp 529–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman DA, Gordon WA, Edwards JD, Macphail RC, Gage MI (1980) Effects of scopolamine, phenobarbital and amphetamine on radial arm maze performance in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:595–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1983) Increased response switching, perseveration and perseverative switching following d-amphetamine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 80:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Fray PJ, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW, Koob GF, Iversen SD (1980) An observational method for quantifying the behavioural effects of dopamine agonists: contrasting effects of d-amphetamine and apomorphine. Psychopharmacology 69:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer M (1953) Stimulus satiation: an explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychol Rev 60:257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan JH, Springer JE, Isaacson RL (1984) Differentiation of basal ganglia dopaminergic involvement in behavior after hippocampectomy. Brain Res 291:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde RA (1970) Animal Behaviour. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvarth TB, Meares RA (1974) DOPA and arousal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 37:416

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RN (1982) A review of atropinic drug effects on exploratory choice behavior in rodents. Behav Neurol Biol 34:5–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerussi TP, Glick SD (1974) Amphetamine induced rotation in rats without lesions. Neuropharmacology 13:283–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW, Widerlöv E, Stanley D, Breese G, Prange AJ (1983) Enkephalin action on the mesolimbic system: a dopamine-dependent and a dopamine-independent increase in locomotor activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 227:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz RJ, Schmaltz K (1981) Dopaminergic involvement in attention: a novel animal model. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol 4:585–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1977) Perseveration and rotational behavior elicited by d-amphetamine in a Y-maze exploratory task: differential effects of intraperitoneal and unilateral intraventricular administration. Psychopharmacology 52:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidis L, Anisman A (1978a) Abatement of stimulus perseveration following repeated d-amphetamine treatment: absence of behaviorally-augmented tolerance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:557–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1978b) Behavior-specific tolerance following chronic d- or-l-amphetamine treatment: lack of involvement of p-hydroxynorephedrine. Neuropharmacology 17:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1980) Amphetamine models of paranoid schizophrenia: an overview and elaboration of animal experimentation. Psychol Bull 88:551–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkinidis L, Anisman H (1981) Amphetamine psychosis and schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 5:449–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey PJ, Livesey DJ, Syme GJ (1981) Spontaneous alternation in the white rat: a learning/memory phenomenon. Behav Neurol Biol 32:158–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Makanjuola ROA, Hill G, Dow RC, Campbell G, Ashcroft GW (1977) The effects of psychotropic drugs on exploratory and stereotyped behaviour of rats studied on a hole-board. Psychopharmacology 55:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowska A, Lukaszweska L (1981) Response to stimulus change following observation or exploration by the rat: differential effects of hippocampal damage. Acta Neurobiol Exp 41:325–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson BJ, Hoglund AU (1981) Exploratory and socio-sexual behaviour in the male laboratory rat: a methodological approach for the investigation of drug action. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 48:168–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery KC (1954) The role of exploratory drive in learning. J Comp Physiol Psychol 47:60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton S (1973) Amphetamine as a model for hyperactivity in the rat. Physiol Behav 11:181–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Oades RD (1981) Dopaminergic agonistic and antagonistic drugs in the ventral tegmentum of rats inhibit and facilitate changes of food search behaviour. Neurosci Lett 27:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Oades RD (1983) Limbic, neocortical and midbrain interactions on measures of attention and memory in the holeboard search task. Behav Res 8:261–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Oades RD (1985) The role of noradrenaline in tuning and dopamine in switching between signals in the CNS. Neurosci Biobehav Rev (in press)

  • Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1982) Functional studies of the central catecholamines. Int Rev Neurobiol 23:303–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Koob GF (1980) Selective disruption of displacement behaviour by lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Nature 285:409–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1981) Neurones dopaminergiques A 10 et système frontal. J Physiol (Paris) 77:81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H, Scatton B, le Moal M (1980) Dopaminergic A 10 neurones are involved in cognitive functions. Nature 288:150–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Taghzouti K (1983) L'innervation dopaminergique du noyau accumbens et du septum: étude comportementale. Thesis 3 cycle, University of Bordeaux II

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oades, R., Taghzouti, K., Simon, H. et al. Dopamine-sensitive alternation and collateral behaviour in a Y-maze: Effects of d-amphetamine and haloperidol. Psychopharmacology 85, 123–128 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427335

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427335

Key words

Navigation