Summary
Pollination by seed parasites is unusual, and previously studied case involve plant species (figs, yuccas) that are pollinated mostly by one host-specific pollinator. Trollius europaeus (Ranunculaceae), however, is pollinated by four Chiastocheta species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) that mate in the flowers, eat pollen and nectar, and complete larval development in the seeds. Strict resource partitioning is present between the fly species, in that different parts of the infructescence are used by larvae of each species, and fly species oviposit at different times in the life of a flower. The flies were shown to be the exclusive pollinators. Because the numbers of ovules fertilized per visit was a fixed proportion of remaining non-fertilized ovules, fly species differed in mean pollinator efficacy, with the last species contributing the fewest pollinations. Therefore, with larval consumption of seeds being fixed and seed initiation decreasing per visit, larvae from later ovipositions consumed more seeds than their mothers pollinated. The point at which costs and benefits were equal was found to be around 4–5 eggs; observed population means of eggs per flower varied between 2.3–7.25 during three years of study. The system is rather insensitive to variation in pollinator density, remaining mutualistic over a wide range. Small changes in pollinator efficacy, however, can tilt the equilibrium to a negative net effect for the plant. These data on Trollius/ Chiastocheta interactions provide the first extensive cost/ benefit analyses for mutualism based on seed parasites as pollinators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addicott JF (1981) Stability properties of two-species models of mutualism: simulation studies. Oecologia 49:42–49
Addicott JF (1986) Variation in the costs and benefits of mutualism: the interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Oecologia 70:486–494
Boucher DH, James S, Keeler KH (1982) The ecology of mutualism. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:315–347
Hagerup O, Petersson V (1956) Botanisk atlas. Munkgaard, Copenhagen
Janzen DH (1979a) How many babies do figs pay for babies? Biotropica 11:48–50
Janzen DH (1979b) How to be a fig. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:13–51
Keeler KH (1985) Cost: benefit models of mutualism. In: Boucher DH (ed) The biology of mutualism. Oxford Univ Press, New York, pp 100–127
Kingsolver RW (1984) Population biology of a mutualistic association: Yucca glauca and Tegeticula yuccasella. PhD diss, Univ of Kansas, Lawrence
Michelsen V (1985) A revision of the Anthomyiidae (Diptera) described by J.W.. Zetterstedt. Steenstrupia 11:37–65
Mik J (1895) Zur Biologie von Chirosia trollii Zett. Wien Ent Z 14:296–300+1 plate
Pellmyr O, Thien LB (1986) Insect reproduction and floral fragrances: keys to the evolution of the angiosperms? Taxon 35:76–85
Powell JA (1983) Biological interrelationships of moths and Yucca schottii. Univ California Publ Ent 100
Ramirez B. W. (1974) Coevolution of Ficus and Agaonidae. Ann MO Bot Gard 61:770–780
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. 2nd ed. Freeman & Co, San Francisco
Thompson JN (1982) Interaction and Coevolution. Wiley & Sons, New York
Wells H (1983) Population equilibria and stability in plant-animal pollination systems. J Theor Biol 100:685–699
Wiebes JT (1979) Co-cvolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:1–12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pellmyr, O. The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites. Oecologia 78, 53–59 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377197
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377197