Skip to main content
Log in

Responses of the trunk routes of a harvester ant to plant density

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Messor barbarus is a Mediterranean harvester ant that constructs physically defined trunk routes on the ground to connect nest entrances with foraging areas. Some responses of these trunk routes to plant density (and therefore resource abundance) were analyzed by testing the preferential allocation of different parts (trunk route ends, segments and branching points) in a patchy environment. Maps of grass density in four categories and Messor barbarus trunk routes were compiled for a Mediterranean pasture in Central Spain over four consecutive years. The proportions of the density categories in each year were used to calculate random expected frequencies of the trunk route points and the predominance of higher or lower grass densities. Trunk route ends discriminate and selectively reach patches with a greater abundance of resources in all study years. Branching points are also allocated preferentially in areas with higher vegetation density, but only in years with a predominance of the higher categories of grass density. In these years, the colonies of Messor barbarus have a “phalanx” strategy at a colonial level, and branching is more profuse. Finally, trunk route segments do not indicate any preference for crossing determined vegetation densities, but rather connect successive branching points or trunk route ends by the shortest route. These results concur with a model of structural strategy change (“guerilla” — “phalanx”) (Hutchings 1988) at the level of trunk routes. They are probably constituted by “transitory” sections with few branches, that expand other more profusely branched sections which are more dedicated to foraging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta FJ, López F, Serrano JM (1992) The dynamics of a therophytic community in relation to self-regulation, herbivores and environmental variation. Vegetatio 98:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insectes Soc 37:258–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein RA (1975) Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density. Ecology 56:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll CR, Janzen DH (1973) Ecology of foraging by ants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:231–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Casado MA (1987) Organización espacial y temporal de pastos mediterráneos en respuesta a perturbaciones mecánicas e incendios. Ph D Thesis Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

  • Crawley MJ (1983) Herbivory. The dynamics of animal-plant interactions. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • David CT, Wood DL (1980) Orientation to trails by a carpenter ant, Camponotus modoc (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in a giant sequoia forest. Can Entomol 112:993–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1977) Foraging ecology and community organization in desert seed-eating ants. Ecology 58:725–737

    Google Scholar 

  • De Miguel JM (1989) Estructura de un sistema silvopastoral de dehesa. Vegetación, habitats y uso del territorio por el ganado. Ph D Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

  • De Vita J (1979) Mechanisms of intereference and foraging among colonies of the harvester and Pogonomyrmex californicus in the Mojave desert. Ecology 60:729–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS (1977) The analysis of contingency tables. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferradas MA, Acosta FJ, Serrano JM (1986) Importancia de las distintas fases del proceso de reclutamiento en hormigas para la explotacion de sus recursos alimenticios. An Biol 8:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG (1977) Some factors influencing colony spacing and survival in the grass-cutting ant Acromyrmex landolfi fracticornis (Forel) (Formicidae: Attini) in Paraguay. Rev Biol Trop 25:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG (1978) Foraging trails of leaf-cutting ants. Proc NY Entomol Soc 86:132–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1991) Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants. Am Nat 138:379–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss S, Deneubourg JL (in press) The self-organising pattern of Messor pergandei (Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Insectes Soc

  • Greaves T (1971) The distribution of the three forms of the meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Australia. J Aust Entomol Soc 10:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness RD, Isham V (1988) Relations between nests of Messor wasmanni in Greece. Insectes Soc 35:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JS, Gentry JB (1981) Foraging pattern, colony distribution, and foraging range of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 62:1467–1473

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1981) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Möglich M (1980) The foraging system of Pheidole militicida (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc 27:237–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings MJ (1988) Differential foraging for resources and structural plasticity in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 3:200–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen CD, Porter SD (1982) Foraging behavior of Pogonomyrmex owyheei in Southeast Idaho. Environ Entomol 11:381–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Levieux J (1979) La nutrition des fourmis granivores. IV. Cycle d'activité et régime alimentaire de Messor galla et de Messor (= Cratomyrmex) regalis en saison des pluies fluctuations annuelles. Discussion. Insectes Soc 26:279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Levings SC, Franks NR (1982) Patterns of nest dispersion in a tropical ground ant community. Ecology 63:338–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Levings SC, Traniello JFA (1981) Territoriality, nest dispersion, and community structure in ants. Psyche 88:265–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett Doust L, Lovett Doust J (1982) The battle strategies of plants. New Sci 91:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver JD (1991) Dispersed central place foraging in australian meat ants. Insectes Soc 38:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Dowd DJ, Hay ME (1980) Mutualism between harvester ants and a desert ephemeral: seed escape from rodents. Ecology 61:531–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Onoyama K (1982) Foraging behavior of the harvester ant Messor aciculatus, with special reference to foraging sites and diel activity of individual ants. Jap J Ecol 32:453–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Onoyama K, Abe T (1982) Foraging behavior of the harvester ant Messor aciculatus in relation to the amount and distribution of food. Jpn J Ecol 32:383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1987) Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (I): trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda FD, Casado MA, Peco B, Olmeda C, Levassor C (1987) Temporal changes in therophytic communities across the boundary of disturbed-intact ecosystems. Vegetatio 71:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Price MV, Reichman OJ (1987) Distribution of seeds in Sonoran desert soils: implications for heteromyid rodent foraging. Ecology 68:1797–1811

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinet Y, Pasteels JM (1987) Description et evolution spatiotemporelle du reseau de pistes chez Lasius fuliginosus. Actes Coll Ins Soc 4:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes J, Fernández J (1983) Modificación de rastros químicos en Messor barbarus (Linneo, 1767). Graellsia 39:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Wheeler J (1976) Foraging responses of Veromessor pergandei to changes in seed production. Pan-Pac Entomol 52:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R (1971) Route fidelity, visual memory and recruitment behaviour in foraging wood ants of the genus Formica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Zool Fenn 133:1–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R (1977a) Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). I. Age polyethism and topographic traditions. Acta Zool Fenn 149:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R (1977b) Foraging strategy of wood ants (Formica rufa group). II. Nocturnal orientation and diel periodicity. Acta Zool Fenn 150:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd JD (1982) Trunk trails and the searching strategy of a leaf-cutter ant, Atta colombica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1987a) The effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol 75:95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade AJ, Hutchings MJ (1987b) Clonal integration and plasticity in foraging behaviour in Glechoma hederacea. J Ecol 75:1023–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR, Harper JL (1978) The demography of a sand dune annual: Vulpia fasciculata. I. The natural regulation of populations. J Ecol 66:15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG (1978) Foraging in seed-harvester ants Pogonomyrmex spp. Ecology 59:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates F (1971) Sampling methods for censuses and surveys, 3-rd edn. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, F., Acosta, F.J. & Serrano, J.M. Responses of the trunk routes of a harvester ant to plant density. Oecologia 93, 109–113 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00321199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00321199

Key words

Navigation