Skip to main content
Log in

Time errors are perceptual

An experimental investigation of duration and a quantitative successive-comparison model

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Methods for the measurement of time-errors (TEs) in the comparison of successive stimulus magnitudes are discussed. Combining a Thurstonian scaling method with the assumption of a fixed subjective width of the “equal” category, independent of stimulus level, a ratio scale for subjective differences within pairs of successive stimuli is derived. In a tone duration comparison experiment, with the TE defined in the terms of these subjective duration differences, data from four experimental groups were compared, the groups using different modes of judging and responding. Only minor effects of this factor were found, and hence it is concluded that the TE is a true perceptual phenomenon rather than an effect of response bias, criterion bias, or mediating verbal responses to the absolute level of stimulation. The quantitative results are interpreted in terms of a general model for the comparison of successive stimuli, employing the concepts of adaptation and differential weighting of sensation magnitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angell, F.: Review of Martin and Müller's “Zur Analyse der Unterschieds-empfindlichkeit”. Amer. J. Psychol. 11, 266–271 (1899)

    Google Scholar 

  • Audley, R.J., Wallis, C.P.: Response instructions and the speed of relative judgment. I. Some experiments on brightness discrimination. Brit. J. Psychol. 55, 59–73 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, R.J.: Measurement in psychology. Advancement of Sci. 1, 422–441 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, M., Holmkvist, O.: On the time-order error in the construction of a subjective time scale. Scand. J. Psychol. 1, 7–13 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. McK.: On errors of observation. Amer. J. Psychol. 5, 285–293 (1893)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J.P.: STEPIT — Finds local minima of a smooth function of several parameters. Behav. Sci. 14, 81–82 (1969) (CPA 312)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, H.: Empirical test of a model relating magnitude and category scales. Scand. J. Psychol. 3, 88–96 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, H.: Possible implications of a non-constant subjective zero in the psychophysical power function. Perc. mot. Skills 16, 778 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, H.: The connection between magnitude and category scales and direct and indirect scaling methods. Psychometrika 30, 271–289 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, H.: Subjective duration and psychophysics. Psychol. Rev. 82, 429–450 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, H.: Experiments on subjective duration 1868–1975. A collection of power function exponents. Psychol. Bull. 83, 1154–1171 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, H., Ottander, C.: On the problem of hysteresis in psychophysics. J. exp. Psychol. 65, 530–536 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, G.: Discriminal sensitivity on the subjective continuum. Acta Psychol. 12, 233–243 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, G.: Weber's law and related functions. J. Psychol. 47, 343–352 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T.: Psychophysics. 1. Discrimination and detection. In: Kling, L.A., Riggs, J.W. (Eds.): Woodworth & Schlosberg's experimental psychology, 3rd ed. New York: Holt 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G.T.: Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hārtel 1860

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P.: Les erreurs constantes dans la reproduction de courts intervalles temporels. Archives de Psychologie 32, 161–176 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, E.: Contemporary psychophysics. In: New directions in psychology. New York: Holt 1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W.R., Hake, H., Eriksen, C.W.: Operationism and the concept of perception. Psychol. Rev. 63, 144–159 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, W.A., David, H.A.: Ties in paired-comparison experiments using a modified Thurstone-Mosteller model. Biometrics 16, 86–109 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M.G.: A modification of Thurstone's law of comparative judgment to accomodate a judgment category of “equal” or “no difference”. Psychol. Bull. 64, 108–112 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P.: Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1954

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulliksen, H.: Comparatal dispersion, a measure of accuracy of judgment. Psychometrika 23, 137–150 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, W.P.: A revised law of comparative judgment. Psychometrika 22, 189–198 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellström, Å.: On time-errors and psychophysical measurement. Unpublished thesis, University of Stockholm 1972

  • Hellström, Å.: Differential sensation weighting as the basic cause of time-errors. Rep. Dep. Psychol., Univ. Stockholm, No. 498 (1977a)

  • Hellström, Å.: Factors producing and not producing time-errors. An experiment with loudness comparisons. Rep. Dep. Psychol., Univ. Stockholm, No. 497 (1977b)

  • Hellström, Å.: On the nature of the time-error. Rep. Dep. Psychol., Univ. Stockholm, Suppl. 38 (1977c)

  • Helson, H.: Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D.G., Petrusic, W.M.: Presentation order effects in duration discrimination. Perc. Psychophys. 17, 197–202 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • John, I.D.: A common mechanism mediating the time-order error and the cross-over effect in comparative judgments of loudness. Austral. J. Psychol. 27, 51–60 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kämpfe, B.: Beiträge zur experimentellen Prüfung der Methode der richtigen und falschen Fälle. Phil. Stud. 8, 549–591 (1893)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, L.: The influence of equality judgments on the constant error. J. exp. Psychol. 42, 300–303 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauenstein, O.: Ansatz zu einer physiologischen Theorie des Vergleichs und der Zeitfehler. Psychol. Forsch. 17, 130–177 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D., Galanter, E.: Discrimination. In: Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (Eds.): Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L.J., Müller, G.E.: Zur Analyse der Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit. Leipzig: Barth 1899

    Google Scholar 

  • McGavren, M.: Memory of brief auditory durations in comparison discriminations. Psychol. Record 15, 249–260 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, W.C., Helson, H.: A quantitative theory of time-order effects. Amer. J. Psychol. 67, 327–334 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkonen, V.: On the retention of perceptual quantities. Comm. Hum. Litt., Soc. Scient. Fenn. 44, Whole No. 3 (1969)

  • Morikiyo, Y.: Time-order error in the successive comparison of tones — an examination by adaptation-level theory. Jap. J. Psychol. 30, 46–55 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Sei: On the time-error in the successive comparison of time. Jap. J. Psychol. 21, 36–45 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Shinshu: The time-error in the successive comparison of tonal durations. Jap. J. Psychol. 29, 18–28 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J.G.: The time error in comparison judgments. Psychol. Bull. 31, 229–243 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J.G.: The effect of the time-interval upon the time-error at different intensive levels. J. exp. Psychol. 18, 530–543 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, C.L., Ogilvie, J.C.: The method of constant stimuli with two or more categories of response. J. math. Psychol. 9, 320–338 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peak, H.: The time order error in successive judgment and in reflexes: III Time error theories. Psychol. Rev. 47, 1–20 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle, F.: Psychology of judgment and choice. New York: Wiley 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, W.: Time estimates measured by reproduction. Perc. mot. Skills 18, 929–943 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L.: An empirical application of a new case of the law of comparative judgment. Scand. J. Psychol. 4, 97–107 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L.: A study of four methods for scaling paired comparisons data. Scand. J. Psychol. 6, 173–185 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L.: Successive intervals scaling of paired comparisons. Psychometrika 32, 297–308 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L.: The dimensionality paradox in comparative judgment: A resolution. Scand. J. Psychol. 9, 97–108 (1968a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L.: Unidimensional scaling of multidimensional facial expressions. J. exp. Psychol. 78, 429–435 (1968b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L.: The dimensionality of similarity judgments. Amer. J. Psychol. 82, 441–456 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg, L.: Uncertainty of comparative judgments and multidimensional structure. Multivar. behav. Res. 10, 207–218 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S.: On the psychophysical law. Psychol. Rev. 64, 153–181 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S.: Psychophysics (ed. by G. Stevens). New York: Wiley 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott, L.H.: Time-order errors in the discrimination of short tonal durations. J. exp. Psychol. 18, 741–766 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Y.: Determination of the point of subjective equality in the constant method procedure. Jap. Psychol. Res. 3, 193–194 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tärnblom, S., Hellström, Å.: Time-errors for weight. Unpublished manuscript, University of Stockholm, 1963

  • Thurstone, L.L.: A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev. 34, 273–286 (1927a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L.: Psychophysical analysis. Amer. J. Psychol. 38, 368–389 (1927b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W.S.: Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley 1958

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierordt, K.: Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen. Tübingen: Laupp 1868

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, C.P., Audley, R.J.: Response instructions and the speed of relative judgment. II. Pitch discrimination. Brit. J. Psychol. 55, 121–132 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W.A.: Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments. J. math. Psychol. 15, 102–122 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H.: Weight discrimination with a varying standard. Amer. J. Psychol. 45, 391–416 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, H.: Time perception. In: Stevens. S.S. (Ed.): Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley 1951

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, B., Jennings, D.L., Rico, N.L.: Time-error in lifted weights as affected by presentation order and judgment mode. Perc. Psychophys. 18, 98–104 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R.S., Schlosberg, H.: Experimental psychology, Rev. ed. New York: Holt 1954

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported by grants to the author from the University of Stockholm and from the Swedish Office of Administrative Rationalization and Economy (for computer time), and by grants to Mats Björkman and Hannes Eisler from the Swedish Council for Social Science Research, whose free consultation service at the Department of Statistics, University of Stockholm, also benefited the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellström, Å. Time errors are perceptual. Psychol. Res 39, 345–388 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308933

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308933

Keywords

Navigation