Skip to main content
Log in

Gender and the prerogatives of dating and marriage: An experimental assessment of a sample of college students

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental data were used to study the amount of support men and women have to pursue nonsexual and sexual activities without their partner in the contexts of dating and marriage. Attention was also focused on whether a partner's independent behavior would be seen as less acceptable in marriage than in dating. The results showed that marriage did reduce a partner's right to engage in outside involvements. However, only males saw marriage as more restrictive than dating. Moreover, these restrictions were not directed at women primarily, but were directed at both male and female target persons. Where differences were found between male and female prerogatives in marriage and dating, they appeared to favor females, providing evidence that among college students some of the structures associated with intimate relationships supported women's interests over men's.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bart, P. B., & O'Brien, P. H. Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies. New York: Pergamon Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begus, S., & Armstrong, P. Daddy's right: Incestuous assault. In I. Diamond (Ed.), Families, politics, and public policy. White Plains, NY: Longman, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. American couples: Money/work/sex. New York: William Morris, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. Jealousy in sexually open marriages. Alternative Lifestyles, 1981, 4, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. Strategies of jealousy: Styles of coping with extramarital involvement of the spouse. Family Relations, 1982, 31, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. A conflict theory of sexual stratification. Social Problems, 1971, 19, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. Sociological insight: An introduction to nonobvious sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. Sociology of marriage and the family: Gender, love, and property. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. Jealousy and sexual property. Social Forces, 1936, 14, 395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. Human society. New York: Macmillan, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. Violence against wives: The case against the patriarchy. New York: The Free Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H. S. Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapist, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978, 36, 156–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., & Yllo, K. Licence to rape. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, L. T. Sexual stereotypes and attributions about sexual arousal. The Journal of Sex Research, 1983, 19, 366–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, S. P., & Wright T. L. Sex differences in type of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 1101–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. L. Reactions to hypothetical, jealousy-producing events. Family Reactions, 1982, 31, 513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. L. Perceived threats and marital jealousy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1985, 48, 262–268. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, G. L. Dating jealousy among college students. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 713–721. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J., & Hirschman, L. Father-daughter incest. Signs, 1977, 12, 735–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 32, 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M. Sexual behavior in the 1970's. Chicago: Playboy Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istvan, J., & Griffit, W. Effects of sexual experience on dating desirability and marriage desirability: An experimental study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1980, 42, 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, A. P., & Williams, J. D. Effects of premarital sexual standards and behavior on dating and marriage desirability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1985, 47, 1059–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranichfeld, M. L. Rethinking family power. Journal of Family Issues, 1987, 8, 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. Sexual harassment and working women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M. M., & Miller, M. L. The effects of sexual permissiveness, target gender, subject gender, and attitude towards women on social perception: In search of the double standard. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathes, E. W., & Severa, N. Jealousy, romantic love, and liking: Theoretical considerations and preliminary scale development. Psychological Reports, 1981, 49, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medea, A., & Thompson, K. Against rape. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, I. E., & Jedlicka, D. Change in sexual attitudes and behavior of college student from 1965 to 1980: A research note. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1982, 44, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. The traffic in women: Notes on the politics of sex. In R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. E. H. Rape in marriage. New York: Macmillan, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. M., & Edwards, J. N. Extramarital sexuality: A model of predictive attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1984, 46, 825–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, C. J. Sexual terrorism. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B., & Margolies, R. Marital separation and extramarital sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 1983, 19, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & McKinney, K., & Orbuch, T. I. Has the double standard disappeared? An experimental test. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1987, 50, 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavris, C., & Sadd, S. The Redbook report of female sexuality. New York: Delacorte, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, D. L., & Slosnerick, M. Attitudes toward sexual and nonsexual extramarital involvement among a sample of college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1981, 43, 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. L. Some correlates of romantic jealousy. Journal of Personality, 1981, 49, 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. L., & Glass, S. P. Justifications for extramarital involvement: The relationship between attitudes and behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Catholic University, 1983.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thanks go to Barry Markovsky and Lorraine Dorfman for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Margolin, L. Gender and the prerogatives of dating and marriage: An experimental assessment of a sample of college students. Sex Roles 20, 91–102 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288029

Keywords

Navigation