Skip to main content
Log in

Carbachol effects on hippocampal neurons in vitro: dependence on the rate of rise of carbachol tissue concentration

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Nominally K-sensitive microelectrodes were used to measure carbachol (CCh) in order to study the dependence of muscarinic effects on CCh concentration and exposure time in guinea pig hippocampal slices. Interference presumably originating from tissue choline-compounds was neutralized by pre-equilibration of the slices with 500 μM choline and calibration of the CCh-sensitive microelectrodes in the presence of the same choline-concentration. Muscarinic depolarization and reduction of the afterhyperpolarization (AHP) following a train of action potentials by bath applied CCh were monitored in granule cells and CA3 pyramidal neurons by intracellular recording. A fast bath application mode of CCh was designed, by which CCh tissue concentration reached a peak after 2–3 min and was washed out with a half time of about 8 min. After application of 30 nmol CCh in this way, the AHP was reduced according to the variation of CCh concentration over time. Neurons depolarized with some delay after the reduction of the AHP and started to repolarize 1 min before the peak of tissue CCh concentration (0.6 μM) was reached. Pirenzepine (1–10 μM) blocked only the depolarization, while atropine (1–10 μM) blocked both the depolarization and the reduction of the AHP. When superfusing with CCh containing saline, 80% of the final concentration was reached in the bath after 12 min, but in the tissue only after 45 min. The slow increase of tissue CCh concentration was concurrent with the slow decrease of the AHP. No effect on the membrane potential was observed. Atropine, but not pirenzepine, blocked the reduction of the AHP. Superfusion with a high CCh concentration (100–300 μM) containing saline depolarized neurons and reduced the AHP. Then pirenzepine repolarized neurons, whereas atropine both repolarized the cells and restored the AHP. It is concluded that the muscarinic depolarization depends not only on the CCh concentration, but also on the rate of rise of CCh, while the reduction of the AHP depends solely on the concentration. This result is discussed in terms of the possibility that the depolarization is mediated by a short term desensitizing M1 muscarinic receptor subtype and the reduction of the AHP is mediated by a M2 muscarinic receptor subtype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akasu T, Koketsu K (1980) Desensitization of the muscarinic receptor controlling action potentials of ganglion cells in bullfrogs. Life Sci 27: 2261–2267

    Google Scholar 

  • Benardo LS, Prince DA (1982a) Cholinergic excitation of mammalian hippocampal pyramidal cells. Brain Res 249: 315–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Benardo LS, Prince DA (1982b) Cholinergic pharmacology of mammalian hippocampal pyramidal cells. Neuroscience 7: 1703–1712

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingmann D, Kolde G (1982) PO2-profiles in hippocampal slices of the guinea pig. Exp Brain Res 48: 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall NJM, Hulme EC (1983) Muscarinic receptor subclasses. TIPS 4: 459–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown DA, Forward A, Marsh S (1980) Antagonist discrimination between ganglionic and ileal muscarinic receptors. Br J Pharmacol 71: 362–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning ET (1971) Free choline formation by cerebral cortical slices from rat brain. Biochem. Biophys Res Commun 45: 1586–1590

    Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi CL, El-Fakahany EE (1986) Short-term desensitization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in mouse neuroblastoma cells: selective loss of agonist low-affinity and pirenzepine high affinity binding sites. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 238: 915–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole AE, Nicoll RA (1983) Acetylcholine mediates a slow synaptic potential in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Science 221: 1299–1301

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole AE, Nicoll RA (1984) Characterization of a slow cholinergic post-synaptic potential recorded in vitro from rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. J Physiol (Lond) 352: 173–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Creese R, Mitchell LD (1981) Spontaneous recovery from depolarizing drugs in rat diaphragm. J Physiol (Lond) 313: 173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzel I, Heinemann U, Hofmeier G, Lux HD (1980) Transient changes in the size of the extracellular space in the sensorimotor cortex of cats in relation to stimulus-induced changes in potassium concentration. Exp Brain Res 40: 432–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd J, Dingledine R, Kelly JS (1981) The excitatory action of acetylcholine on hippocampal neurones of the guinea-pig and rat maintained in vitro. Brain Res 207: 109–127

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Fakahany EE, Ramkumar V, Lai WS (1986) Multiple binding affinities of N-methylscopolamine to brain muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: differentiation from M1 and M2 receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 238: 554–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Frotscher M, Misgeld U, Nitsch C (1981) Ultrastructure of mossy fiber endings in in vitro hippocampal slices. Exp Brain Res 41: 247–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Gähwiler BH, Dreifuss JJ (1982) Multiple actions of acetylcholine on hippocampal pyramidal cells in organotypic explant cultures. Neuroscience 7: 1243–1256

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas HL (1982) Cholinergic disinhibition in hippocampal slices of the rat. Brain Res 233: 200–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell JV, Adams PR (1982) Voltage-clamp analysis of muscarinic excitation in hippocampal neurons. Brain Res 250: 71–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer R, Berrie CP, Birdsall NJM, Burgen ASV, Hulme EC (1980) Pirenzepine distinguishes between different subclasses of muscarinic receptors. Nature 283: 90–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer R, Giachetti A (1982) Muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1 and M2 biochemical and functional characterization. Life Sci 31: 2991–2998

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounsgaard J (1978) Presynaptic inhibitory action of acetylcholine in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Exp Neurol 62: 787–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston D, Brown TA (1984) Biophysics and microphysiology of synaptic transmission in hippocampus. Dingledine R (ed) Brain slices. Plenum Press, New York, pp 51–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E, Rooney AT, Nahorski SR (1985) Pertussis toxin separates two muscarinic receptor-effector mechanisms in the striatum. Eur J Pharmacol 119: 129–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Krnjević K, Mitchell JF (1960) Diffusion of acetylcholine in agar gels and in the isolated rat diaphragm. J Physiol (Lond) 153: 562–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Krnjević K, Reinhardt W (1979) Choline excites cortical neurons. Science 206: 1321–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis PR, Shute CCD (1967) The cholinergic limbic system: projections to hippocampal formation, medial cortex, nuclei of the ascending cholinergic reticular system and the subfornical organ and supraoptic crest. Brain 90: 521–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C-L, McIllwain H (1957) Maintenance of resting membrane potentials in slices of mammalian cerebral cortex and other tissues in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 139: 178–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang CC, Quastel JH (1969) Uptake of acetylcholine in rat brain cortex slices. Biochem Pharmacol 18: 1169–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux HD, Neher E (1973) The equilibration time course of [KK]o in cat cortex. Exp Brain Res 17: 190–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison DV, Lancaster B, Nicoll RA (1987) Voltage clamp analysis of cholinergic action in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 7: 733–741

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney M, Richelson E (1986) Muscarinic responses and binding in a murine neuroblastoma clone (N1E-115): cyclic GMP formation is mediated by a low affinity agonist-receptor conformation and cyclic AMP reduction is mediated by a high affinity agonist-receptor conformation. Mol Pharmacol 30: 207–211

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney M, Stenstrom S, Richelson E (1985) Muscarinic responses and binding in a murine neuroblastoma clone (N1E-115): mediation of separate responses by high affinity and low affinity agonist-receptor conformations. Mol Pharmacol 27: 220–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Misgeld U, Frotscher M (1982) Dependence of the viability of neurons in hippocampal slices on oxygen supply. Brain Res Bull 8: 95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Misgeld U, Müller W (1988) The role of M1 and M2 receptors in slow muscarinic excitation of hippocampal neurons. In: Haas HL, Buzsàki G (eds) Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 137–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Misgeld U, Sarvey JM, Klee MR (1979) Heterosynaptic postactivation potentiation in hippocampal CA3 neurons: long-term changes of the postsynaptic potentials. Exp Brain Res 37: 217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller W, Misgeld U (1986) Slow cholinergic excitation of guinea pig hippocampal neurons is mediated by two muscarinic receptor subtypes. Neurosci Lett 67: 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Neher E, Lux HD (1973) Rapid changes of potassium concentration at the outer surface of exposed single neurons during membrane current flow. J Gen Physiol 61: 385–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson C, Phillips JM (1981) Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular microenvironment of the rat cerebellum. J Physiol (Lond) 321: 225–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Park MR, Kita H, Klee MR, Oomura Y (1983) Bridge balance in intracellular recording; introduction of the phase-sensitive method. J Neurosci Meth 8: 105–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak RL (1969) The influence of drugs on the uptake of acetylcholine by slices of rat cerebral cortex. Br J Pharmacol 36: 144–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal M (1982) Multiple actions of acetylcholine at a muscarinic receptor studied in the rat hippocampal slice. Brain Res 246: 77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DG, Horvath E, Traber J (1986) Direct autoradiographic determination of M1 and M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor distribution in the rat brain: relation to cholinergic nuclei and projections. Brain Res 380: 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentino RJ, Dingledine R (1981) Presynaptic inhibitory effect of acetylcholine in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 7: 784–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler MH, Misgeld U, Cheong DK (1984) Presynaptic muscarinic modulation of nicotinic excitation in the rat neostriatum. Brain Res 296: 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler MH, Misgeld U, Bak U, Jenden DJ (1979) Acetylcholine synthesis in rat neostriatal slices. Brain Res 176: 401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto C, Kawai N (1967) Presynaptic action of acetylcholine in thin sections from the guinea pig dentate gyrus in vitro. Exp Neurol 19: 176–187

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, W., Misgeld, U. & Heinemann, U. Carbachol effects on hippocampal neurons in vitro: dependence on the rate of rise of carbachol tissue concentration. Exp Brain Res 72, 287–298 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250251

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250251

Key words

Navigation