Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of predation risk and hunger on the behaviour of two species of tadpoles

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predation and hunger are threats for most organisms, and appropriate behavioural responses to both factors should be shaped by natural selection. In combination, however, the behavioural demands of predation avoidance and effective foraging often cannot be satisfied at the same time and lead to a conflict within organisms. We examined the behavioural responses of two closely-related species of tadpoles, Rana lessonae and R. esculenta, to simulated predation by fish and hunger. Tadpoles, hatched and reared in the laboratory, were tested in a three-way factorial (predation risk × hunger × species) experiment with four predation levels and four hunger levels. Both species decreased their swimming activity with increasing predation risk. Predation risk did not influence the amount of activity time invested in feeding but caused the tadpoles to spend less time in patches with food. Refuges were not used to avoid predation. R. esculenta was more sensitive to predation risk than R. lessonae. Hunger increased both the activity of tadpoles and the amount of activity time invested in feeding, thus indicating an increased energy intake. No interactions were observed between predation risk and hunger. These results show that tadpoles possess genetically-based behavioural mechanisms that allow them to respond in a graded manner to predation and hunger. However, they did not balance the two conflicting demands of predation avoidance and effective foraging; the two mechanisms appeared to act independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger L (1977) Systematics and hybridization in the Rana esculenta complex. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 367–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1983) Western Palearctic water frogs (Amphibia, Ranidae): systematics, genetics, and population compositions. Experimentia 39:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn HJ (1977) Reproduction and mating behaviour in Rana lessonae-Rana esculenta mixed poulations. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 389–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerri RD, Fraser DF (1983) Predation and risk in foraging minnows: balancing conflicting demands. Am Nat 121:552–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM, Fraser AHG (1984) Risk of predation and the feeding behaviour of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon SM, Baker RL (1988) Effects of size on predation risk, behavioural response to fish, and cost of reduced feeding in larval Ischnura verticalis (Coenagrionidae: Odonata). Oecologia 76:200–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf JD, Polls-Pelaz M (1989) Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. In: Dawley RM, Bogart JP (eds) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates (Museum Bulletin 466). New York State Museum, Albany, pp 289–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Horat P (1993) Effects of predation and hunger on the behaviour of tadpoles of the waterfrogs Rana esculenta and Rana lessonae. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Zurich

  • Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler SP (1989) Behavioural responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. Anim Behav 38:1039–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Valone TJ, Caraco T (1985) Foraging-efficiency-predation-risk trade-off in the grey squirrel. Anim Behav 33:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1990) Behavioral differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology 71:1714–1726

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB, Furness RW (1984) Changing priorities: the effect of pre-migratory fattening on the trade-off between foraging and vigilance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:203–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Nature 275:642–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Petranka J, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35:420–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard G (1964) The prey of dragonfly (Odonata: Anisoptera) in ponds in northern Alberta. Can J Zool: 785–800 Rist L (1994) Differences in feeding time, consumption rate, and growth efficiency between hemiclonal and sexual tadpoles of the Rana esculenta complex. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Zurich

  • Semlitsch RD, Reyer HU (1992) Modification of anti-predator behaviour in tadpoles by environmental conditioning. J Anim Ecol 61:353–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1980) Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210:1041–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1986) Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 67:434–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Predator and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfood WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1992) Prey uncertainity and the balancing of antipredator and feeding needs. Am Nat 139:1052–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer H-P, Semlitsch RD (1993) Effects of visual, chemical, and tactile cues of fish on the behavioural responses of tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RA, Magnusson JJ (1976) Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57:751–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunner HG (1973) Das Albumin und andere Bluteiweisse bei Rana ridibunda P., Rana lessonae Camerano, Rana esculenta Linné und deren Hybriden. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 11:219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunner HG (1979) The inheritence of morphology and electrophoretic markers from homotypic crosses of the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta. Mitt Zool Mus Berlin 55:89–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug RJ (1973) Aspects of social behavior in anuran larvae. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, pp 273–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Anholt BR (1993) Ecological consequences of the tradeoff between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am Nat 142:242–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward BD (1983) Predator-prey interactions and breeding-pond use of temporary-pond species in a desert anuran community. Ecology 64:1549–1555

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: R.D. Semlitsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horat, P., Semlitsch, R.D. Effects of predation risk and hunger on the behaviour of two species of tadpoles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34, 393–401 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167330

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167330

Key words

Navigation