Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding some ontological differences in Indian Philosophy

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Commentary on Nyāyakusumāñjali 3.7.

  2. Nyāyatātparyatīkāpariśuddhi on Nyāyasûtra 1.1.4. Ed. A. Thakur, Darbhanga, 1967.

  3. For a more detailed discussion of this, see my Consciousness and Knowledge in Indian Philosophy, Philosophy East and West, XXIX, 1979,3–10.

  4. For elaboration of this, see the Introduction to my Gangeśa's Theory of Truth, Santiniketan: Center of Advanced Study in Philosophy, 1966.

  5. cp. R. V. De Smet, Patterns and Theories of Causality, in Essays in Philosophy to T. M. P. Mahadevan, ed. C. T. K. Chari et. al. (Madras: Ganesh, 1962), pp. 347–367; esp. p. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The possibility of such an understanding was first pointed out to me by Professor David Davis of the University of Hawaii.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oklahoma, USA

    J. N. Mohanty

Authors
  1. J. N. Mohanty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohanty, J.N. Understanding some ontological differences in Indian Philosophy. J Indian Philos 8, 205–217 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166295

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166295

Keywords

Search

Navigation