Skip to main content
Log in

Rent-seeking with non-identical sharing rules

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary object of this paper is to examine the role of differential sharing rules within a collective rent-seeking setting on the possible non-existence of Nash equilibrium. Focusing on groups that distribute part of the rent equally among their members and the residual according to relative effort, we show that in rent-seeking societies applying the two polar sharing rules equilibrium never exists. In the general case where groups apply different but not necessarily the polar sharing rules, we study the relationship between group variability in distributing rents and the problem of non-existence of equilibrium in the rent-seeking game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R.J. (1988). Rent-seeking with non-identical players. Public Choice 57: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E. and Katz, E. (1986a). Transfer seeking and avoidance: On the full social cost of rent-seeking. Public Choice 48: 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E. and Katz, E. (1986b). Rent-seeking and entry. Economics Letters 20: 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E. and Katz, E. (1986c). Seeking rents by setting rents: The political economy of rent-seeking. Economic Journal 97: 685–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, W.J. and Karels, G.V. (1985). Rent-seeking behavior in the long run, Public Choice 46: 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M. and Nitzan, S. (1989). Advantageous multiple rent-seeking. Mathematical Modelling 12: 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R.S., Shughart, W.F. and Tollison, R.D. (1985). Free entry and efficient rent-seeking. Public Choice 46: 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.L. and Katz, E. (1984). Risk-averse rent seekers and the social cost of monopoly power. Economic Journal 94: 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.L. and Riley, J.G. (1989). Politically contested rents and transfers. Economics and Politics 1: 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.L. and Samet, D. (1987). Dissipation of rents and revenues in small number contests. Public Choice 54: 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Nitzan, S. and Rosenberg, J. (1990). Rent-seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice 65: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A.O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review 64: 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N.V. and Vousden, N. (1987). Risk averse rent seeking with shared rents. Economic Journal 97: 971–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitzan, S. (1989). Collective rent dissipation. Mimeo.

  • Posner, R. (1975). The social costs of monopoly and regulation. Journal of Political Economy 83: 807–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies and theft. Western Economic Journal 5: 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent-seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, and G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. 97–112: College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1984). Long-run equilibrium and total expenditures in rent-seeking: Comment. Public Choice 43: 95–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1985). Back to the bog. Public Choice 46: 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursprung, H.W. (forthcoming). Rent-seeking for public goods and candidate competition. Economics and Politics.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nitzan, S. Rent-seeking with non-identical sharing rules. Public Choice 71, 43–50 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138449

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138449

Keywords

Navigation