Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review of research related to the learning effect of dynamic versus static visual displays in media-based instruction is presented. The analysis reveals that the dynamic visual display (DVD) is generally more effective than the static visual display (SVD). However, the research findings do not consistently support the superior effect of DVDs. These conflicting findings seem to be related to the different theoretical rationales and methodological approaches used in various studies and suggest that the use of DVDs should be determined selectively. From the literature review and theoretical discussions about instructional functions of DVDs, we propose six instructional conditions under which DVDs can be effectively used. The conditions are for: (a) demonstrating sequential actions in a procedural task; (b) simulating causal models of complex system behaviors; (c) explicitly representing invisible system functions and behaviors; (d) illustrating a task which is difficult to describe verbally; (e) providing a visual analogy for an abstract and symbolic concept, and (f) obtaining attention focused on specific tasks or presentation displays. Finally, several important considerations for the design and presentation of DVDs are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesandrini, K. L. and Rigney, J. W. (1981). Pictorial presentation and review strategies in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F. and Yost, G. (1985). The geometry tutor. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, 1–7.

  • Baek, Y. K. and Layne, B. H. (1988). Color, graphics and animation in a computer-assisted learning tutorial lesson. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15, 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, T. (1977). Motion in instructional media: some subject-display mode interactions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 975–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraballo, J. N. (1985). The effect of various display modes in computer-based instruction and language background upon achievement of selected educational objectives. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvanis State University.

  • Caraballo-Rios, A. L. (1985). An experimental study to investigate the effect of computer animation on the understanding and retention of selected levels of learning outcomes. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Carpenter, P. A. and Just, M. A. (1992). Understanding mechanical systems through computer animation and kinematic imagery. (Report No. ONR92–1) Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M. and Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Adams, M. and Pew, R. (1978). Effectiveness of an interactive map display in tutoring geography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: a study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6, 37–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, F. N. (1924). Visual education: a comparative study of motion picture and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. L. (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., Hoisington, M. and Buescher, K. (1982). Recognition memory for pictures: dynamic versus static stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. (1987). Artificial intelligence and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. L. and Weitzman, L. (1983). STEAMER: an interactive inspectable simulation-based training system. The AI Magazine, 2, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, A. P. (1924). The effectiveness of the film and demonstration in teaching cooking. In F. N., Freeman (Ed.), Visual education: a comparative study of motion pictures and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, A. P. (1927). Motion picture for instruction. New York: The Century Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, H. W. (1924). The relative effectiveness of six forms of lesson presentation. In F. N., Freeman (Ed.), Visual education: a comparative study of motion picture and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R. and Anderson, K. (1985). Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 795–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W. A. (1975). A comparison of three combinations of text and graphics for concept learning. (Report No. NPRDC-TR-76–16). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (ERIC Document Service No. ED112936)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. (1987). Conditions affecting the effectiveness of animated and non-animated displays in computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Oakland, CA.

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. (1982). Interactive graphical modeling game for teaching musical concepts. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 9, 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, S. (1954). The impact of visual aid displays showing a manipulative task. Quarterly Review of Experimental Psychology, 6, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, S. (1955). Some factors influencing the effectiveness of a training film. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 280–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A., Levin, J., Shimron, J. and Gutterman, J. (1975). Pictures and young children's learning from oral prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 636–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesogold, A., McCormick, C. and Gollinkoff, R. (1975). Imagery training and children's prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 663–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W. and Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: a review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., Anglin, G. and Carney, R. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D., Willows and H., Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration, volume 2: instructional issues (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. and Lesgold, A. (1978). On pictures in prose. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 26, 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958a). Attention directed to parts of a film. In M. A., May and A. A., Lumsdaine (Eds.), Learning from films (pp. 84–106). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958b). Cue and response function in pictures and words. In M. A., May and A. A., Lumsdaine (Eds.), Learning from films (pp. 123–149). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. (1961). Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A., Sulzer, R. L. and Kopstein, F. F. (1961). The effect of animation cues and repetition of examples on learning from an instructional film. In A. A., Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction, (pp. 241–269). Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. A. (1958). Verbal responses to demonstration films. In M. A., May and A. A., Lumsdaine (Eds.), Learning from films. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. A. and Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958). Learning from films. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. and Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: an experimental test of a dualcoding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. and Kohl, D. (1983). Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClusky, F. D. and McClusky, H. Y. (1924). Comparison of six modes of presentation of subject matter. In F. N., Freeman (Ed.), Visual education: a comparative study of motion pictures and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1955/1961). Some factors influencing the effectiveness of demonstrational films: repetition of instructions, slow motion, distributed showing and explanatory narration. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction, (pp. 187–207). Place?: National Research Council.

  • Moore, M. V. and Nawrocki, L. H. (1978). The educational effectiveness of graphic displays for computer assisted instruction. (Report No. ARI-TP 332) Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD AO62585).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., Nawrocki, L. and Simutis, Z. (1979). The instructional effectiveness of three levels of graphics displays for computer-assisted instruction. (Report No. ARI-TP-359). Arlington, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ERIC Document Service No. ED 178–057).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Gringneti, M., Gross, M. and Massey, L. D. (1992). Intelligent conduct of fire trainer: intelligent technology applied to simulation-based training. In M. J. Farr and J. Psotka, Intelligent instruction by computer: theory and practice (pp. 239–250). Washington: Taylor and Francis, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1982). Learning and memory. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1972). Teaching children thinking. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 9, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, O. and Gittelman, S. (in press). Selective use of animation and feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 27–38.

  • Peters, H. J. and Daiker, K. C. (1982). Graphics and animation as instructional tools: a case study. Pipeline, 7, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remembers what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children's learning: putting the picture in developmental perspective, Review of Educational Research, 47, 585–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K. (1985). Effects of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (1989). The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factual and application learning in an elementary science lesson. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 431–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (1990a). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (1990b). Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P., Boyce, M. J. and Assad, C. (1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. and Hannafin, M. J. (1988). The effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction. Computers in the Schools, 5, 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiber, L. P. and Kini, A. S. (1991). Theoretical foundations of instructional applications computer-generated animated visuals. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, F. (1987). Instructional design, cognition and technology: applications to the teaching of scientific concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, B. J., Beekelaar, R., Tyle, A. and Merrill, D. (1991). GIL: Scaffolding learning to program with reasoning-congruent representations. CSL Report 48, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. and Gagné, R. M. (1982). Characteristics of media selection models. Review of Educational Research, 52, 499–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, B. J., Ranney, M., Lovett, M. C. and Kimberg, D. Y. (1989). Facilitating students' reasoning with causal explanations and visual representations. In D., Bierman, J., Breuker and J., Sanberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education. Springfield, VA: IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, J. W. and Lutz, K. A. (1976). Effects of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshal, S. M. (1961). Film mediated learning with varying representations of the task: viewing angle, portrayal of demonstration, motion and student participation. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 155–175). National Research Council.

  • Sheffield, F. D. (1961). Theoretical considerations in the learning of Complex Sequential tasks from demonstration and practice. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 31–52). National Research Council.

  • Silverman, R. E. (1958). The comparative effectiveness of animated and static transparences. (Report No. NTDC-TR 78–1). Port Washington, NY: US Naval Training Device Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1963). Operant behavior. American Psychologist, 18, 503–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, R. W. (1973). The motion variable in procedural learning. Audio-Visual Communication Review, 21, 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swezey, R. W., Perez, R. S. and Allen, J. A. (1991). Effects of instructional strategy and motion presentation conditions on the acquisition and transfer of electro-mechanical trouble-shooting skill. Human Factors, 33, 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology, volume 2: the psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towne, D. M., Munroe, A., Pizzini, Q. A. and Surmon, D. S. (1987). Representing system behaviors and expert behaviors for intelligent tutoring. Technical Report No. 108. Los Angeles: Behavioral Technology Laboratories, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (1984). Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton's laws of motion. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 69–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withrow, M. (1978). Computer animation and language instruction. American Annual of the Deaf, 123, 723–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withrow, M. (1979). Illustrating language through computer generated animation. American Annual of the Deaf, 124, 549–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B., Blegan, D., Jansen, J. and Verloop, A. (1986). Teaching a complex industrial process. Philadelphia, PA: National Association of Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1912). An introduction to psychology. London: G. Allen and Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U. S. Army Research Institute, 5001 Eisenhower Avenue, 22333, Alexandria, VA, U.S.A.

    Ok-Choon Park & Reginald Hopkins

Authors
  1. Ok-Choon Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reginald Hopkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, OC., Hopkins, R. Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review. Instr Sci 21, 427–449 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118557

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118557

Keywords

Search

Navigation