Skip to main content
Log in

Improving the quality of statistics in regulatory ecotoxicity tests

  • Papers
  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The results of an international workshop on the use of statistics in regulatory ecotoxicology are presented. There are currently many errors of omission in the recommendations on statistical analysis given in test guidelines. These are identified and advice is given on how to incorporate best statistical practice. The use of the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) as a summary statistic is questioned, and an alternative is suggested. Several areas of research that would resolve uncertainty in the design and analysis of ecotoxicity tests are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adbelbasit K.M. and Plackett R.L. (1983) Experimental design for binary data. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 78, 90–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson A.C. (1985) Plots, Transformations and Regression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage P. and Berry G. (1987) Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailer A.J. and Oris J.T. (1993) Assessing toxicity of pollutants in aquatic systems. In Case Studies in Biometry N.Lange, L.Ryan, L.Billard, D.Brillinger, L.Conquest and J.Greenhouse (eds), pp. 25–40. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett V. and Lewis T. (1979) Outliers in Statistical Data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnthouse L.W., SuterII G.W., Rosen A.E. and Beauchamp J.J. (1987) Estimating responses of fish populations to toxic contaminants. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 6, 811–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain P. and Cousens R. (1989) An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Res. 29, 93–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce R.D. and Versteeg D.J. (1992) A statistical procedure for modeling continuous toxicity data. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11, 1485–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloner K. and Larntz K. (1989) Optimal Bayesian design applied to logistic regression experiments. J. Stat. Plan. Inf. 21, 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett D. (1991) Modelling Binary Data. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett D. (1994) Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R.D. and Weisberg S. (1982) Residuals and Influence in Regression. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox C. (1987) Threshold dose-response models in toxicology. Biometrics 43, 525–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox D.R. (1958) Planning of Experiments. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump K.S. (1984) A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 4, 854–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • deBruijn J. (1994) The political acceptability of the ECx. In How to Measure No Effect: Towards a Measure of Chronic Toxicity. F.Noppert, A.Leopold and N.van derHoeven (eds). Unpublished workshop report BKH Consulting Engineers, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel W.W. (1990) Applied Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd edition. Boston: PWS-KENT Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day R.W. and Quinn G.P. (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 59, 433–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle P.J., Liang K. and Zeger S.L. (1994) Analysis of Longitudinal Data. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper N.R. and Smith H. (1981) Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir L. and Tutz G. (1994) Multivariate Statistical Modelling Based on Generalized Linear Models. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney D.J. (1971) Probit Analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, N. OECD, Personal communication.

  • Hamilton M.A., Russo R.C. and Thurston R.V. (1977) Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11, 714–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra J.A. and vanEwijk P.H. (1993) Alternatives for the no-observed effect level. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12, 187–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S. (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalish L.A. (1990) Efficient design for estimation of median lethal dose and quantal dose-response curves. Biometrics 46, 737–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman S.A.L.M. (1981) Parametric analyses of mortality rates in bioassays. Water Res. 17, 749–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman S.A.L.M. (1983) Statistical aspects of the determination of mortality rates in bioassays. Water Res. 19, 107–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooijman S.A.L.M. (1993) Dynamic Energy Budgets in Biological Systems: Theory and Applications in Ecotoxicology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • idem. (1996) An alternative for NOEC exists but the standard model has to be abandoned first. Oikos, in press.

  • Laskowski R. (1995) Some good reasons to ban the use of NOEC, LOEC and related concepts in ecotoxicology. Oikos 73, 140–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisenring W. and Ryan L. (1992) Statistical properties of the NOAEL. Reg. Tox. and Pharm. 15, 161–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P. and Nelder J.A. (1989) Generalised Linear Model, 2nd edition. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters J.A., Lewis M.A., Davidson D.H. and Bruce R.D. (1991) Validation of a four-day Ceriodaphnia toxicity test and statistical considerations in data analysis. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 10, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan B.J.T. (1992) Analysis of quantal response data. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller H-G. and Schmitt T. (1990) Choice of number of doses for maximum likelihood estimation of the EC50 for quantal dose-response data. Biometrics 46, 117–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman M.C. (1995) Quantitative Methods in Aquatic Ecotoxicology. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman M.C. and McCloskey J.T. (1996) Time-to-event analyses of ecotoxicity data. Ecotoxicology 5, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noppert F., Leopold A. and van derHoeven N. (1994) How to Measure No Effect: Towards a Measure of Chronic Toxicity. Unpublished workshop report, BKH Consulting Engineers Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack, S. (1993) A Review of Statistical Data Analysis and Experimental Design in OECD Aquatic Toxicology Test Guidelines. Report to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.

  • Robertson J.L., Smith K.C., Savin N.E. and Lavigne J.L. (1984) Effects of dose selection and sample size of the precision of lethal dose estimates in dose-mortality regression. J. Econ. Entomol. 77, 833–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé H. (1959) The Analysis of Variance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalski J.R. (1981) Statistical inconsistencies in the use of no-observed-effect-levels in toxicity testing. In Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Fourth Conference, ASTM STP 737 D.R.Branson and K.L.Dickson (eds), pp. 377–87. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitter R.R. (1992) Robust designs for binary data. Biometrics 48, 1145–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. (1995) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan C.E. (1977) Methods of calculating LC50. In Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Evalution, ASTM STP 634. F.L.Mayer and J.L.Hamelink (eds), pp. 65–84. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing of Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan C.E. and Rogers J.W. (1985) Advantages of using regression to calculate results of chronic toxicity tests. In Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Eighth Symposium, ASTM STP 891 R.C.Bahner and D.J.Hansen (eds), pp. 328–38. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • SuterII G.W., Rosen A.E., Linder E. and Parkhurst D.F. (1987) Endpoints for responses of fish to chronic toxic exposures. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 6, 793–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • van derHoeven N. (1991) LC50 estimates and their confidence intervals derived for tests with only one concentration with partial effect. Water Res. 25, 401–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer B.J. (1971) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams D.A. (1986) Interval estimation of the median lethal dose. Biometrics 42, 641–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, P.F., Crane, M., Wiles, J. et al. Improving the quality of statistics in regulatory ecotoxicity tests. Ecotoxicology 5, 169–186 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116338

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116338

Keywords

Navigation