Skip to main content

Introduction

Leaping Into Learning Progressions in Science

  • Chapter
Learning Progressions in Science

Abstract

Learning progressions—descriptions of increasingly sophisticated ways of thinking about or understanding a topic (National Research Council [NRC], 2007)—offer a promising framework for bringing coherence to multiple facets of the educational system. Learning progressions, which articulate cognitive models of the development of student understanding, have the potential to inform the design of standards, large-scale and classroom assessments, curricula, and teacher professional development. As such, the science education community has taken considerable interest in learning progressions. However, as with any new research agenda, there are challenges. If these challenges are not addressed, they may thwart the promise that learning progressions hold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alonzo AC. Learning progressions that support formative assessment practices. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2011;9:124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009, May). Learning progressions in science: An evidence- based approach to reform (CPRE Research Report #RR-63). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis EA, Krajcik JS. Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher. 2005;34(3):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales R, Guzman JC, Partelow L, Pahlke E, Jocelyn L, Kastberg D, Williams T. Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2004 (NCES 2005-005). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotwals AW, Songer NB. Reasoning up and down a food chain: Using an assessment framework to investigate students' middle knowledge. Science Education. 2010;94:259–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver C, Duncan RG. Learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2009;46(6 [Special issue]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn M, Tsuchida I, Lewis C, Songer NB. Beyond fourth grade science: Why do US and Japanese students diverge? Educational Researcher. 2000;29(3):4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Retrieved from the National Academies Press website: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html

  • National Research Council. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010, July). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Retrieved from the National Academies website: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Standards_Framework_Homepage.html

  • National Research Council. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, J. E., Kesidou, S., Stern, L., & Caldwell, A. (1999). Heavy books light on learning: AAAS Project 2061 evaluates middle grades science textbooks. Science Books & Films, 35(6), 243-247. Retrieved from Project 2061 website: http://www.project2061.org/publications/textbook/articles/heavy.htm

  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, D. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). Splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Acadmic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, G.A., & Schmidt, W. H. (1997). Refocusing U.S. math and science education. Issues in Science and Technology, 14(2), 60-66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alicia C. Alonzo Amelia Wenk Gotwals

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gotwals, A.W., Alonzo, A.C. (2012). Introduction. In: Alonzo, A.C., Gotwals, A.W. (eds) Learning Progressions in Science. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships