Abstract
This chapter is focused on photography as a research method and on the interpretations of photographs in ethnographic research. The case we have chosen in order to examine the use of photography in ethnographic research is an example of participatory photography where the participants have taken the photos. Many of the issues explored here with regard to participatory photography pertain as well to other ways of using photography in ethnographic research. We have chosen a recent study of ours as the case to exemplify the interpretation of photographs. The purpose of this study is to explore how Finland-Swedish students position themselves with regard to belonging to the Finland-Swedish group by using photography as well as interviews as the data collection methods. In particular we were interested in exploring how photographs and interviews complement each other. We are exploring the role of the researchers’ own identifications and sense of belonging as well as habitus in the interpretation of data about participants belonging to the same language minority group, and presumably having a similar habitus.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, L. (2009). ‘Snapped’: Researching the sexual cultures of schools using visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(5), 549–561.
Banks, M. (2000). Visual anthropology: Image, object and interpretation. In J. Posser (Ed.), Image-based research. A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 9–23). London: Routledge Falmer.
Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.
Banks, M. (2007). Using visual data in qualitative research. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990a). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990b). Photography. The middle-brow Art. English translation: Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Boustien, G. (2003). Envisioning ethnography – Exploring the meanings of the visual in research. Social Analysis, 47(3), 1–7.
Broady, D. (1990). Sociologi och Epistemologi. Om Pierre Bourdieus Författarskap och den Historiska Epistemologin. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
Burnard, P. (2002). Using image-based techniques in researching pupil perspectives. Communicating, 5, 2–3.
Clark-Ibanez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1507–1526.
Coffey, A. (2007). The place of the personal in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 4, 1.
Cremin, H., Mason, C., & Busher, H. (2011). Problematising pupil voice using visual methods: Findings from a study of engaged and disaffected pupils in an urban secondary school. British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 585–603.
Croghan, R., Griffin, C., Hunter, J., & Phoenix, A. (2008). Young people’s constructions of self: Notes on the use and analysis of the photo-elicitation methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 345–356.
Davies, J. (2007). Display, identity and the everyday: Self-presentation through online image sharing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(4), 549–564.
Einarsdottir, J. (2005). Playschool in pictures: Children’s photographs as a research method. Early Childhood Development, 175(6), 523–541.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2004). Basic education. www.oph.fi
Fischman, G. (2001). Reflections about images, visual culture, and educational research. Educational Researcher, 30, 2833.
Gibson, B. E. (2005). Co-producing video diaries: The presence of the “absent” researcher. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(3), Article 3. Retrieved 8 Mar 2006 from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/backissues/4_4/pdf/gibson.pdf.
Grady, J. (2001). Becoming a visual sociologist. Sociological Imagination, 38(1/2), 83–119.
Grinyer, A. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics and practicalities. Social Research Update. (36):1.
Grosvenor, I. D. (2007). From the ‘eye of history’ to ‘a second gaze’: The visual archive and the marginalized in the history of education. History of Education, 36(4&5), 607–622.
Grosvenor, L., Lawn, M., & Rousmaniere, K. (1999). Silences and images: The social history of the classroom. New York: Peter Lang.
Harper, D. (2000). An argument for visual sociology. In J. Posser (Ed.), Image-based research. A sourcebook for qualitative researchers (pp. 24–41). London: Routledge Falmer.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo-elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Hockings, P. (Ed.). (2003). Principles of visual anthropology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Holm, G. (1997). Teenage motherhood: Public posing and private thoughts. In N. Paley & J. Jipson (Eds.), Daredevil research (pp. 61–81). New York: Peter Lang.
Holm, G. (2008a). Visual research methods: Where are we and where are we going? In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 325–341). New York: Guilford.
Holm, G. (2008b). Photography as a performance. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Art. 38. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/394/856
Holm, G. (forthcoming). Photography as a research method. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Janhonen-Abruquah, H., & Holm, G. (2008). Using photographs as a data collection method in family research. In I. Järventie & M. Lähde (Eds.), Methodological challenges in childhood and family research (pp. 72–80). Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Lane, H. (1993). The mask of benevolence. Disabling the deaf community. New York: Vintage Books.
Liebkind, K., Teräsaho, M., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2006). Upplevelser av hot mot den finlandssvenska identiteten – orsak till identitetsförstärkande stategier? In K. Liebkind & T. Sandlund (Eds.), Räcker det med svenskan? Om finlandssvenskarnas anknytning till sina organisationer (Skrifter utgivna av Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland, Vol. 684, pp. 89–122). Helsinki: Svenska Litteratursällskapet.
Lister, M., & Wells, L. (2001). Seeing beyond belief: Cultural studies as an approach to analyzing the visual. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), The handbook of visual analysis (pp. 61–91). London: Sage.
Lodge, C. (2009). About face: Visual research involving children. Education, 37(4), 3–13.
Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111.
Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L. (2011). The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. London: Sage.
McRae, K. D. (with assistance of Mika Helander and Sari Luoma) (1997). Conflict and compromise in multilingual societies, vol. 3 Finland: Wilfred Laurier University Press & The Finnish Academy of Science and Letters. Annales Academiæ scientiarum fennicæ, Series. HUMANIORA, nr. 306.
Mirzoeff, N. (2009). An introduction to visual culture. London: Routledge.
Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. London: Sage Publications.
Newman, M., Woodcock, A., & Dunham, P. (2006). ‘Playtime in the borderlands’: Children’s representations of school, gender and bullying through photographs and interviews. Children’s Geographies, 4(3), 289–302.
Östern, A.-L. (2004). ‘My language tree’: Young Finland‐Swedish adults tell us about their linguistic and cultural identities. 36(6):657–672.
Pauwels, L. (2008). Taking and using. Ethical issues of photographs for research purposes. Visual Communication Quarterly, 15, 243–257.
Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography (1st ed.). London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2006). The future of visual anthropology. Engaging the senses. New York: Routledge.
Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2012). Advances in visual methodology. London: Sage.
Prosser, J. (2007). Visual methods and the visual culture of schools. Visual Studies, 22(1), 13–30.
Renold, E., Holland, S., Ross, N., & Hilman, A. (2008). ‘Becoming participant’: Problematizing ‘informed consent’ in participatory research with young people in care. Qualitative Social Work, 7(4), 427–447.
Rose, G. (2005). Visual methodologies. An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies. An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Salo, O.-P. (2012). Finland’s official Bilingualism – A bed of roses or of procrustes? In J. Blommaert, S. Leppänen, P. Pahta, & T. Räisänen (Eds.), Dangerous multilingualism northern perspectives on order, purity and normality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sensoy, Ö. (2011). Picturing oppression: Seventh graders’ photo essays on racism, classism, and sexism. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 323–342.
Serriere, S. C. (2010). Carpet-time democracy: Digital photography and social consciousness in the early childhood classroom. The Social Studies, 101, 60–68.
Slotte‐Lüttge, A. (2004). Roles and positioning in a meeting between Finland‐Swedish bilingual pupils and their teacher. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(6), 673–684.
Stanczak, G. C. (2007). Visual research methods. Image, society, and representation. London: Sage.
Stephenson, A. (2009). Horses in the sandpit: Photography, prolonged involvement and ‘stepping back’ as strategies for listening to children’s voices. Early Childhood Development and Care, 179(2), 131–141.
Sweetman, P. (2009). Revealing habitus, illuminating practice: Bourdieu, photography and visual methods. The Sociological Review, 57(3), 491–511.
Veintie, T., & Holm, G. (2010). Knowledge and learning visually portrayed by Amazonian indigenous teacher education students. Ethnography and Education, 5(3), 325–343.
Westerholm, A. (2011). Årsbok för utbildningsstatistik. Den svenskspråkiga utbildningen. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
Wiles, R., Prosser, J., Bagnoli, A., Clark, A., Davies, K., Holland, S., & Renold, E. (2008). Visual ethics: Ethical issues in visual research . NCRM Working Paper. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf. Retrieved 15 Jan 2012.
Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robison, J., & Prosser, J. (2012). Ethical regulation and visual methods: Making visual research impossible or developing good practice. Sociological Research Online, 17(1):8. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/1/8.html, doi:10.5153/sro.2274
Wilson, N., Dasho, S., Martin, A. C., Wallerstein, N., Wang, C. C., & Minkler, M. (2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice: The youth employment strategies (YES!) project. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(2), 241–261.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2010). Theorizing identity: Beyond the ‘us’ and ‘them’ dichotomy. Patterns of Prejudice, 44(3), 261–280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holm, G., Londen, M., Mansikka, JE. (2015). 4.4 Interpreting Visual (and Verbal) Data: Teenagers’ Views on Belonging to a Language Minority Group in Finland. In: Smeyers, P., Bridges, D., Burbules, N., Griffiths, M. (eds) International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9282-0_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9281-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9282-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)