Skip to main content

Mathematical Heuristic — Lakatos and Pólya

  • Chapter
Appraising Lakatos

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Library ((VCIL,volume 1))

Abstract

Amidst the growing interest in actual scientific activity, the process of discovery became a legitimate, sometimes even central topic in philosophies of science. It can be studied from psychological, historical, sociological and philosophical points of view, as well. Instead of emphasising its irrational or unconscious aspect, some philosophers tried to grasp it in rational terms. Among them, Pólya and Lakatos studied the classic problems of the,‘art of discovery,’ and elaborated their views with respect to the more general problems of knowledge and understanding. In this paper, I compare their approaches to mathematical heuristic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. George Pólya: How to Solve It. A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1945. p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John E. Littlewood: The Mathematicians Art of Work. in: Mathematical Intelligencer,1 (1978) n. 21, p. 112–118.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This distinction came from Lakatos: “Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic” (Philosophical Papers,Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978 p. 136), written in 1968. In the Proof’s and Refutation - first published in 1963–64 - Lakatos still did not refer to it.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pólya: Induction and Analogy (Vol. 1 of Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning) Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1954, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. As with Lakatos in theProofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery (John Worrall and Elie Zahar, eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kiss, O. (2002). Mathematical Heuristic — Lakatos and Pólya. In: Kampis, G., Kvasz, L., Stöltzner, M. (eds) Appraising Lakatos. Vienna Circle Institute Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0769-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5922-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0769-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics