Skip to main content

Subject Clitics in French and Romance Complex Inversion and Clitic Doubling

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 45))

Abstract

The analysis of the French construction of Complex Inversion illustrated in (1) below raises difficulties with respect to current conceptions of available phrase structure:

  1. (1)
    1. a.

      Jean est-il malade?

      ‘Is John sick?’

    2. b.

      Depuquis quand Jean est-il malade.

      ‘Since when is John sick.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, M., K. Johnson and I. Roberts: 1989, ‘Passive Arguments Raised’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 219–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandi I. and P. Cordin: 1989, ‘Two Italian Dialects and the Null Subject Parameter’, In O. Jaeggli and K. Safir, eds., Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, D.: 1982, On the Content of Empty Categories, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1992, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,’ MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G.: 1988, ‘On si Constructions and the Theory of Arb’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 521–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, M.: 1991, ‘The Semantics of Specificity’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevisse, M.: 1980, Le Bon Usage, 11 ème edition, Editions Duculot, Paris-Gembloux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O.: 1982 Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O. and C. Silva Corvalan: 1986, Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggli, O. and K. Safir: 1989, The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1972, ‘Subject Inversion in French Interrogatives’, In J. Casagrande and B. Saciuk, eds., Generative Studies in Romance Languages, Newbury House, Rowley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1975, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1984, Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R.: 1991, ‘Romance Clitics, Verb Movement and PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H.: 1993, ‘The Internal and External Distribution of Pronominal DPs’, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H.: 1994a, ‘Licensing Heads’, In N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot, eds., Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Closkey, J.: 1992, ‘On the Scope of Verb Movement in Irish’, unpublished ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Y-C: 1979, ‘There is No Inversion of Subject Clitics in Modern French’, ms., Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Y-C: 1985, ‘On Two French Subjectless Verbs voici and voilà’, Language 61.4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, M.: 1989, ‘Operator Licensing and the Case of French Interrogatives’, In Proceedings of the Eighth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 8, 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, M.: 1992, ‘Case and Syntactic Geometry’, Doctoral Dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, D.: 1972, Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J-Y.: 1990, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzi L. and L. Vanelli: 1982, ‘I Pronomi Sogetto in Alcune Varieta Romanze’, In Studi Linguistici in Onore di G.B,. Pelligrini, Pacini, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L.: 1986, ‘On the Status of Subject Clitics in Romance’, In O. Jaeggli and C. Silva Corvalan, eds., Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L. and I. Roberts: 1989, ‘Complex Inversion in French,’ Probus 1, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberge, Y.: 1990, The Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, K.: 1985, Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlonsky, U.: 1988, ‘Complementizer Cliticization in Hebrew and the Empty Category Principle’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1989, ‘Le Mouvement Syntaxique: Constraintes et Paramètres’, Languages 95, 35–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1983, Structural Invarience and Symmetry in Syntax, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, distributed by the MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1988, ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1995a, ‘Clitic Constructions’, In L. Zaring and J. Rooryck, eds., Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1995b, ‘Sketch of a Reductionist Approach to Syntactic Variation and Dependencies’, In H. Campos and P. Kempchinsky, eds., Evolution and Revolution in Linguistics Theory, Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: 1995c, ‘French Predicate Clitics and Clause Structure’, In A. Cardinaletti and M.T. Guasti, eds., Small Clauses, Syntax and Semantics, volume 28, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, D.: to appear, ‘Pronominal Clitic Dependencies’, In Henk van Riemsdijk, ed., Language Typology: Clitics in the European Languages, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suñer, M.: 1991, ‘Two Properties of Clitics in Clitic-Doubled Constructions’, In J. Huang and R. May, eds., Logical Structure and Linguistic: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1983, ‘On the non-Unitary Nature of Verb-Second’, ms., Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sportiche, D. (1999). Subject Clitics in French and Romance Complex Inversion and Clitic Doubling. In: Johnson, K., Roberts, I. (eds) Beyond Principles and Parameters. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 45. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5501-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4822-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics