Skip to main content

The Ord River Estuary: A Regulated Wet-Dry Tropical River System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Estuaries of Australia in 2050 and beyond

Abstract

The lower Ord River is a wet-dry tropical river functioning as a perennial dry tropical river as a result of regulation. It is currently one of the few heavily regulated rivers in Australia’s tropical north, providing water for hydroelectrical production and irrigation. Current plans call for an increase in the area of irrigated land surrounding the lower Ord River and its estuary. The estuary is highly turbid and subject to very strong tides. It can be conceptualised as five connected physical zones – the Riverine Zone, the Tidal Freshwater Zone, the Transitional (Maximum Turbidity) Zone, the Estuary Mouth, and the Tidal Creeks and Flats Zone – distinguished by geomorphology, flow and tidal influence. Each of these physical zones functions as a distinct biogeochemical and ecological functional zone. Here, we describe how these zones function, how they interact, and how the estuary as a whole may respond to the changes expected in the mid-term future.

The sole copyright holder of Chapter 8 is: CSIRO

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Residence times were calculated using a one-dimensional hydraulic model of the river, which is described by Robson and Webster submitted.

References

  • Alongi DM (2001) The influence of mangrove biomass and production on biogeochemical processes in tropical macrotidal coastal settings. Org Sediment Interact 21:223–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton BR, Berents HW, Frakes LA (1990) Groote Eylandt manganese deposit. In: Hughes FE (ed) Geology of the mineral deposits of Australia and Papua New Guinea, vol 14, Monograph series/Australasian institute of mining and metallurgy. Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Parkville, pp 1575–1579

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright F (2005) Lake Kununurra redclaw trapping trial and rule recommendations. Report to W.A. Department of Fisheries, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie JE, Mitchell AW (2005) Nutrients in Australian tropical rivers: changes with agricultural development and implications for receiving environments. Mar Freshw Res 56(3):279–302. doi:10.1071/Mf04081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Thoms MC, Hamilton SK, Capon SJ (2006) Flow variability in dryland rivers: boom, bust and the bits in between. River Res Appl 22(2):179–186. doi:10.1002/Rra.904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burford MA, Alongi DM, McKinnon AD, Trott LA (2008) Primary production and nutrients in a tropical macrotidal estuary, Darwin Harbour, Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 79(3):440–448. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burford MA, Revill AT, Palmer DW, Clementson L, Robson BJ, Webster IT (2011) River regulation alters drivers of primary productivity along a tropical river-estuary system. Mar Freshw Res 62(2):141–151. doi:10.1071/Mf10224

    Google Scholar 

  • Camkin JK, Bristow KL, Petheram C, Paydar Z, Cook FJ, Story J (2008) Designs for the future: the role of sustainable irrigation in northern Australia. In: Sustainable irrigation management, technologies and policies II, vol 112. WIT, Southampton, pp 293–302

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cluett L (2005) The role of flooding in morphological changes in the regulated Lower Ord River in tropical northwestern Australia. River Res Appl 21(2–3):215–227. doi:10.1002/Rra.842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coull BC (2009) Role of meiofauna in estuarine soft‐bottom habitats*. Aust J Ecol 24(4):327–343

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (2009) Water in the Ord-Bonaparte region. In: CSIRO (ed) Water in the Timor Sea drainage division. A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Northern Australia Sustainable Yields Project. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Canberra, pp 183–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Conservation & Land Management (2003) Information Sheet on Ramsar wetlands (Ord River Floodplain). Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water (2006) Ord river water management plan, Water resource allocation planning series. Government of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water (2012a) Ord surface water allocation plan: for public comment. Water resource allocation planning series. Department of Water, vol report no 48. Government of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water (2012b) Ord surface water allocation plan methods report : background information and description of methods for the Ord surface water allocation plan. Government of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RNM, Palmer DW (2010) Lake Argyle sedimentation – 2006 survey. Salinity and land use impacts series. Department of Water, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas MM, Bunn SE, Davies PM (2005) River and wetland food webs in Australia’s wet-dry tropics: general principles and implications for management. Mar Freshw Res 56(3):329–342. doi:10.1071/Mf04084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doupe RG, Pettit NE (2002) Ecological perspectives on regulation and water allocation for the Ord River, Western Australia. River Res Appl 18(3):307–320. doi:10.1002/Rra.676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erskine WD, Saynor MJ, Erskine L, Evans KG, Moliere DR (2005) A preliminary typology of Australian tropical rivers and implications for fish community ecology. Mar Freshw Res 56(3):253–267. doi:10.1071/Mf04078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford P, Tillman P, Robson B, Webster IT (2005) Organic carbon deliveries and their flow related dynamics in the Fitzroy estuary. Mar Pollut Bull 51(1–4):119–127. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke P (2009) Ecological patterns and processes in the lower Ord River and Estuary. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest MA, Connolly RM (2004) Fine-scale movement and assimilation of carbon in saltmarsh and mangrove habitat by resident animals. Aquat Ecol 38(4):599–609. doi:10.1007/s10452-004-0442-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head L (1999) The northern myth revisited? Aborigines, environment and agriculture in the Ord River Irrigation Scheme, stages one and two. Aust Geogr 30(2):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn CJ, Robson BJ (2000) Modelling a bottom diurnal boundary layer and its control of massive alga blooms in an estuary. Appl Math Model 24(11):843–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay WR (2004) Movements and home ranges of radio-tracked Crocodylus porosus in the Cambridge Gulf region of Western Australia. Wildl Res 31(5):495–508. doi:10.1071/Wr04037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ, Olden JD, MacKay SJ, Stein JL, Marsh N (2010) Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshw Biol 55(1):171–193. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02307.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon RA, Loneragan NR, Manson FJ, Vance DJ, Venables WN (2004) Allopatric distribution of juvenile red-legged banana prawns (Penaeus indicus H. Milne Edwards, 1837) and juvenile white banana prawns (Penaeus merguiensis De Man, 1888), and inferred extensive migration, in the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf, northwest Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 309(1):79–108. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2004.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumlu M, Jones DA (1995) Salinity tolerance of hatchery-reared postlarvae of Penaeus-Indicus Milne-Edwards, H. originating from India. Aquaculture 130(2–3):287–296. doi:10.1016/0044-8486(94)00319-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latrubesse EM, Stevaux JC, Sinha R (2005) Tropical rivers. Geomorphology 70(3–4):187–206. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (1998) Ecological role of grapsid crabs in mangrove ecosystems: a review. Mar Freshw Res 49(4):335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2009) Tropical mangrove ecology: physical and biotic factors influencing ecosystem structure and function. Aust J Ecol 24(4):355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Loneragan N, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (Australia), CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, CSIRO Marine Research (2002) The growth, mortality, movements and nursery habitats of red-legged banana prawns (Penaeus indicus) in the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf: project FRDC 97/105. CSIRO Marine Research, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  • Magilligan FJ, Salant NL, Renshaw CE, Nislow KH, Heimsath A, Kaste JM (2006) Evaluating the impacts of impoundment on sediment transport using short-lived fallout radionuclides. In: Sediment dynamics and the hydromorphology of fluvial systems, vol 306. IAHS, Wallingford, pp 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson F, Loneragan N, Harch B, Skilleter G, Williams L (2005) A broad-scale analysis of links between coastal fisheries production and mangrove extent: a case-study for northeastern Australia. Fish Res 74(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A, Storey A (2005) Lower Ord River functional habitat mapping: evaluation and field trial of remote sensing platforms and imaging techniques. Report to the Department of Environment, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes PJ, Thompson GG, Withers PC (2005) Diet and foraging behaviour of the semi-aquatic Varanus mertensi (Reptilia: Varanidae). Wildl Res 32(1):67–74. doi:10.1071/Wr04040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moliere DR, Lowry JBC, Humphrey CL (2009) Classifying the flow regime of data-limited streams in the wet-dry tropical region of Australia. J Hydrol 367(1–2):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL, Rowland AJ, Gill HS, Doupe RG (2004) The implications of introducing a large piscivore (Lates calcarifer) into a regulated northern Australian river (Lake Kununurra, Western Australia). Lakes Reserv Res Manag 9(3–4):181–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGIS Australia (2004) Australia’s tropical rivers – data audit. Land and Water Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum WE, Heald EJ (1972) Trophic analyses of an estuarine mangrove community. Bull Mar Sci 22(3):671–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Parslow J, Margvelashvili N, Palmer D, Revill A, Robson B, Sakov P, Volkman J, Watson R, Webster I (2003) The response of the lower Ord River and estuary to management of catchment flows and sediment and nutrient loads: final science report. CSIRO Marine Research/Land and Water Australia, Hobart

    Google Scholar 

  • Petheram C, McMahon TA, Peel MC (2008) Flow characteristics of rivers in northern Australia: implications for development. J Hydrol 357(1–2):93–111. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phinney DA, Yentsch CS, Phinney DI (2004) Primary productivity of phytoplankton and subtidal microphytobenthos in Cobscook Bay, Maine. Northeast Nat 11:101–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD (1995) Functional-organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76(2):606–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle CM (2001) Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecol Appl 11(4):981–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AI, Dixon P, Daniel PA (1988) Zooplankton dynamics in mangrove and other nearshore habitats in tropical Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 43(1–2):139–150. doi:10.3354/Meps043139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson BJ, Webster IT (submitted) Can we model macrotidal estuaries well? A case study modelling impacts of changes to irrigation and flow regulation in a dryland tropical river. Submitted to Environmental Modelling and Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson BJ, Bukaveckas PA, Hamilton DP (2008a) Modelling and mass balance assessments of nutrient retention in a seasonally-flowing estuary (Swan River Estuary, Western Australia). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76(2):282–292. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2007.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson BJ, Burford MA, Gehrke PC, Revill AT, Webster IT, Palmer DW (2008b) Response of the lower Ord River and Estuary to changes in flows and sediment and nutrient loads. Water for a Healthy Country National research Flagship, CSIRO, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheaves M, Molony B (2000) Short-circuit in the mangrove food chain. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 199:97–109. doi:10.3354/Meps199097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheaves M, Johnston R, Connolly RM, Baker R (2012) Importance of estuarine mangroves to juvenile banana prawns. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 114:208–219. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2012.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AJ (2008) Rainfall and irrigation controls on groundwater rise and salinity risk in the Ord River Irrigation Area, northern Australia. Hydrogeol J 16(6):1159–1175. doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0301-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GA (1970) Lands of the Ord-Victoria area, Western Australia and Northern Territory. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetzlaff D, Soulsby C, Waldron S, Malcolm IA, Bacon PJ, Dunn SM, Lilly A, Youngson AF (2007) Conceptualization of runoff processes using a geographical information system and tracers in a nested mesoscale catchment. Hydrol Process 21(10):1289–1307. doi:10.1002/Hyp.6309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom BG, Wright LD, Coleman JM (1975) Mangrove ecology and deltaic-estuarine geomorphology – Cambridge Gulf-Ord River, Western-Australia. J Ecol 63(1):203–222. doi:10.2307/2258851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms M, Hill S, Spry M, XiangYang C, Mount T, Sheldon F (2004) The geomorphology of the Barwon-Darling basin. In: Breckwoldt R, Boden R, Andrew J (eds) The Darling. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, pp 68–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Trayler K, Malseed BE, Braimbridge MJ (2006) Environmental values, flow related issues and objectives for the lower Ord River. Department of Water, Government of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) River continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37(1):130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkman JK, Revill AT, Bonham PI, Clementson LA (2007) Sources of organic matter in sediments from the Ord River in tropical northern Australia. Org Geochem 38(7):1039–1060. doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Stanford JA (1995) Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regul Rivers: Res Manage 11(1):105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfe DM, Pettit NE, Davies PM, Pusey BJ, Hamilton SK, Kennard MJ, Townsend SA, Bayliss P, Ward DP, Douglas MM, Burford MA, Finn M, Bunn SE, Halliday IA (2011) The ‘wet-dry’ in the wet-dry tropics drives river ecosystem structure and processes in northern Australia. Freshw Biol 56(11):2169–2195. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02660.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wark RJ (1987) Deposition of sediment in Lake Argyle. Western Australia Water Authority, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson RJ, Caitcheon G, Murray AS, McCulloch M, Quade J (2002) Sourcing sediment using multiple tracers in the catchment of Lake Argyle, Northwestern Australia. Environ Manage 29(5):634–646. doi:10.1007/s00267-001-0049-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water and Rivers Commission (2003) Productivity and water flow regulation in the Ord River of North-Western Australia. Environmental flows initiative project, Perth (23092)

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster IT, Rea N, Padovan AV, Dostine P, Townsend SA, Cook S (2005) An analysis of primary production in the Daly River, a relatively unimpacted tropical river in northern Australia. Mar Freshw Res 56(3):303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski E, Moore K, Spagnol S, D’Adamo N, Pattiaratchi C (2001) Rapid, human-induced siltation of the macro-tidal Ord River Estuary, Western Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 53(5):717–732. doi:10.1006/ecss.2001.0799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolanski E, Spagnol S, Williams D (2004) The impact of damming the Ord river on the fine sediment budget in Cambridge gulf, northwestern Australia. J Coast Res 20(3):801–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Much of the data and analysis presented in this chapter is the product of original research, funded by the Australian Government, Government of Western Australia, and Rangelands NRM Coordinating Group and is gratefully acknowledged. In-kind support was provided by CSIRO, Griffith University and the Department of Water (DoW), Government of Western Australia.

The support of the Rangelands NRM Coordinating Group and its co-ordinator, Liz Brown, in linking us with interested stakeholders is gratefully acknowledged.

Thanks are due to Scott Goodson (DoW) for field support and for introducing us to the Miriuwung-Gajerrong community, the Traditional Owners of the region. Thanks to Ian Loh (DoW) for his comments regarding the history and planned future of water allocation in the river, and for working with us to model future scenarios.

Particular thanks are due to John Parslow, Nugzar Margvelashvili and John Volkman (all CSIRO) for their contributions to the initial study design, 2002–2003 fieldwork, and subsequent discussions. DoW staff also assisted with field work.

Technical support in laboratory analyses was provided by Rebecca Esmay and Stephane Armand (CSIRO).

Finally, thanks to Andrew and Kate McEwen and their team for providing a great field operation work area and accommodating our ever-changing needs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara J. Robson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Calculation of Suspended Sediment and Nutrient Budgets

Appendix: Calculation of Suspended Sediment and Nutrient Budgets

Suspended sediment and nutrient loads reaching the lower river were calculated by multiplying daily flows from Kununurra Diversion Dam by estimated nutrient and sediment concentrations at the furthest upstream monitoring site, then adding similarly calculated loads from Dunham River and from the small volume of irrigation return flow entering the river a few kilometres downstream, at D2, D4 and D6 (Fig. 1).

Monthly water quality samples are unfortunately not sufficient to allow precise estimates of daily suspended sediment and nutrient concentrations. Given wide variations in flow, simple interpolation between observations is not satisfactory. Daily suspended sediment and nutrient concentration estimates were therefore derived, where possible, from empirical relationships between available water quality observations and observed flows. Logistical considerations and the unpredictability of rainfall events prohibited a precise definition of flow-concentration relationships in the river, but in most cases, there were sufficient data from the observation program to define some approximate relationships.

Concentrations of particulate phosphorus (PP), and total suspended sediments (TSS) in Dunham River correlated reasonably well with flow in Dunham River (r2 = 0.65 for PP, r2 = 0.69 for TSS with 32 degrees of freedom). The correlation between flow and particulate nitrogen (PN) was poor (r2 = 0.26), however better data were not available. Daily estimates of PN as well as PP and TSS in Dunham River were therefore obtained from quadratic regressions fit to the available flow and concentration data.

Water quality in outflow from Kununurra Diversion Dam (KDD) is not directly monitored, but was assumed to match water quality just downstream of the dam, at site 15 (Ivanhoe Crossing, Fig. 1). Gaps in the monitoring record at this site were filled with data from the nearest downstream site – usually site 13 (Tarrara Bar).

Suspended sediment and nutrient concentrations downstream of the dam showed no clear relationship with flows from the dam. Similarly, suspended sediment and nutrient concentrations in the irrigation drains (D2, D4 and D6, Fig. 1) did not correlate with flows in these drains. Correlations were found, however, between TSS, PN and PP at these sites and flow measured in Dunham River. PN, PP and TSS concentrations in all tributaries were thus specified as fitted quadratic functions of flow in the Dunham River.

For concentrations just downstream of Kununurra Diversion Dam, these functions provided an acceptable fit (r2 for PP = 0.71; r2 for TSS = 0.74 and r2 for PN = 0.30, with 32 degrees of freedom). The strength of the relationships between water quality and flow in the irrigation drains (D2, D4 and D6) was weak, however the contribution of these drains to the total suspended sediment and total nutrient loads is relatively small, so the high error in this approximation does not contribute greatly to the uncertainty of the overall nutrient and sediment budgets. For concentrations in D4 vs. Dunham River flow, r2 for PP = 0.57; r2 for TSS in D4 = 0.27 and r2 for PN = 0.15, with 22 degrees of freedom. For concentrations in D2 vs. Dunham River flow, r2 for PP = 0.22, for TSS = 0.13, and for PN = 0.19, with 21 degrees of freedom.

No correlation was found between concentrations of dissolved organic or dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus, and flow. Hence, dissolved nutrient concentrations (DIN and DIP) for each tributary were set to a constant value equal to the mean concentration observed in that tributary.

A numerical model of flows, sedimentation and biogeochemical transformations (Robson et al. 2008b; Robson and Webster submitted), calibrated against observed water quality in the lower river and estuary, was used to determine the quantity of suspended sediments and nutrients reaching the estuary, given the calculated loads reaching the lower river.

Sources and sinks within the river were calculated by taking the difference between the calculated loads entering the river from tributaries and drains and the modelled loads delivered to the estuary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 CSIRO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robson, B.J., Gehrke, P.C., Burford, M.A., Webster, I.T., Revill, A.T., Palmer, D.W. (2013). The Ord River Estuary: A Regulated Wet-Dry Tropical River System. In: Wolanski, E. (eds) Estuaries of Australia in 2050 and beyond. Estuaries of the World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7019-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics