Skip to main content

Science, Conservation, and Camera Traps

  • Chapter
Camera Traps in Animal Ecology

Abstract

Biologists commonly perceive camera traps as a new tool that enables them to enter the hitherto secret world of wild animals. Camera traps are being used in a wide range of studies dealing with animal ecology, behavior, and conservation. Our intention in this volume is not to simply present the various uses of camera traps, but to focus on their use in the conduct of science and conservation. In this chapter, we provide an overview of these two broad classes of endeavor and sketch the manner in which camera traps are likely to be able to contribute to them. Our main point here is that neither photographs of individual animals, nor detection history data, nor parameter estimates generated from detection histories are the ultimate objective of a camera trap study directed at either science or management. Instead, the ultimate objectives are best viewed as either gaining an understanding of how ecological systems work (science) or trying to make wise decisions that move systems from less desirable to more desirable states (conservation, management). Therefore, we briefly describe here basic approaches to science and management, emphasizing the role of field data and associated analyses in these processes. We provide examples of ways in which camera trap data can inform science and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amstrup, S. C., T. L. McDonald, and B. F. J. Manly. 2005. Handbook of capture-recapture analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier, T., J. D. Nichols, J. R. Sauer, J. E. Hines, and K. H. Pollock. 1998. Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79:1018–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. and W. S. Overton. 1979. Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60:927–936

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, C., S. Christie, T. Coulson, N. Franklin, J. Ginsberg, M. Griffiths, J. Holden, K. Kawanishi, M. Kinnaird, R. Laidlaw, A. Lynam, D. W. Macdonald, D. Martyr, C. McDougal, L. Nath, T. Obrien, J. Seidensticker, D. Smith, M. Sunquist, R. Tilson, and W. N. W. Shahruddin. 2001. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Animal Conservation 4:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, T. C. 1897. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Journal of Geology 5:837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A. and M. J. Kelly. 2007. Ocelot Leopardis pardalis in Belize: the impact of trap spacing and distance moved on density estimates. Oryx 41:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorazio, R. M. and J. A. Royle. 2005. Estimating size and composition of biological communities by modeling the occurrence of species. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100:389–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R. and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective. Confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenelle, C. S., M. C. Runge, and D. I. MacKenzie. 2002. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic animals: a comment on misleading conclusions. Animal Conservation 5:119–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, F. A. 2006. Adaptive harvest management and double-loop learning. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 71:197–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. 1995. Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biological Conservation 71:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U. and J. D. Nichols. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, N. S. Kumar, W. A. Link, and J. E. Hines. 2004a. Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:4854–4858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, and N. S. Kumar. 2004b. Photographic sampling of elusive mammals in tropical forests. Pages 229–247 in W. L. Thompson, editor. Sampling rare or elusive populations. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth, K. U., J. D. Nichols, N. S. Kumar, and J. E. Hines. 2006. Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling. Ecology 87:2925–2937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawanishi, K. and M. E. Sunquist. 2004. Conservation status of tigers in a primary rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia. Biological Conservation 120:329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, W. L. 2001. Using models to facilitate complex decisions. Pages 147–170 in T. M. Shenk and A. B. Franklin, editors. Modeling in natural resource management: development, interpretation and application. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1966. The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 54:421–431

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, N. Sutton, K. Kawanishi, and L. L. Bailey. 2005. Suggestions for dealing with detection probability in population studies of rare species. Ecology 86:1101–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, J. A. Royle, K. H. Pollock, L. A. Bailey, and J. E. Hines. 2006. Occupancy modeling and estimation. Academic, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. 2001. Using models in the conduct of science and management of natural resources. Pages 11–34 in T. M. Shenk and A. B. Franklin, editors. Modeling in natural resource management: development, interpretation and application. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. and M. J. Conroy. 1996. Estimation of species richness. Pages 227–234 in D. Wilson et al., editors. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. and K. U. Karanth. 2002. Statistical concepts: assessing spatial distributions. Pages 29–38 in K. U. Karanth and J. D. Nichols, editors. Monitoring tigers and their prey. A manual for wildlife managers, researchers, and conservationists. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D. and B. K. Williams. 2006. Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:668–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., F. A. Johnson, and B. K. Williams. 1995. Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:177–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., T. Boulinier, J. E. Hines, K. H. Pollock, and J. R. Sauer. 1998a. Estimating rates of local extinction, colonization and turnover in animal communities. Ecological Applications 8:1213–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., T. Boulinier, J. E. Hines, K. H. Pollock, and J. R. Sauer. 1998b. Inference methods for spatial variation in species richness and community composition when not all species are detected. Conservation Biology 12:1390–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. D., L. L. Bailey, A. F. O’Connell, Jr., N. W. Talancy, E. H. C. Grant, A. T. Gilbert, E. Annand, T. Husband, and J. E. Hines. 2008. Occupancy estimation using multiple detection devices. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1321–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, A. F., N. W. Talancy, L. L. Bailey, J. R. Sauer, R. Cook, and A. T. Gilbert. 2006. Estimating site occupancy and detection probability parameters for mammals in a coastal ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:1625–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis, D. L., K. P. Burnham, G. C. White, and D. R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62:1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. R. 1964. Strong inference. Science 146:347–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A. 2004. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A. and R. M. Dorazio. 2008. Hierarchical modeling and inference in ecology. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Royle, J. A. and J. D. Nichols. 2003. Estimating abundance from repeated presence absence data or point counts. Ecology 84:777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, P. A., S. W. Buskirk, G. D. Hayward, and C. M. del Rio. 2005. Information theory and hypothesis testing: a call for pluralism. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, M. W., S. E. Carrillo-Percastegui, R. L. Pitman, R. Mares, and G. Powell. 2008. An evaluation of camera-traps for inventorying large and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K. 1996. Adaptive optimization and the harvest of biological populations. Mathematical Biosciences 136:1–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., J. D. Nichols, and M. J. Conroy. 2002. Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. K., R. C. Szaro, and C. D. Shapiro. 2007. Adaptive management: the US Department of the Interior technical guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz, N. G., J. D. Nichols, and T. Boulinier. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:446–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Nichols .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nichols, J.D., Karanth, K.U., O’Connell, A.F. (2011). Science, Conservation, and Camera Traps. In: O’Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D., Karanth, K.U. (eds) Camera Traps in Animal Ecology. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99495-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics