Skip to main content

THA Ceramic-Ceramic Coupling: The Evaluation of the Dislocation Rate with Bigger Heads

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Ceramics in Orthopaedics ((CIO))

Abstract

According to Charnley, the rationale to reduce the head diameter in THA is in decreasing the friction torque and the volumetric wear, but, employing a ceramic-ceramic coupling instead of a metal-polyethylene one, bigger diameters can be used without increasing in a considerable way neither the volumetric wear rate nor the friction torque.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the Hip. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag 1979

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Willmann G. The evolution of ceramics in total hip replacement. Hip Int 2000; 10: 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. J Bone J Surg Am 2000; 82: 1300–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelley SS, Lachiewicz PF, Hickman JM, Paterno SM. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop 1998 Oct; 335:163–70

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hedlundh U, Ahnfelt L, Hybbinette CH, Wallinder L, Weckstrom J, Fredin H. Dsilocations and femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996; 333:226–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan L, Shih C. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999, 119:263–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerouge S, Huk O, Yahia L, Witvoet J, Sedel L. Ceramic-ceramic and polyethylene total hip replacement: comparison of pseudomembranes after loosening. J Bone J surg Br 1997; 79:135–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritsch EW, Gleitz M. Ceramic femoral head fractures in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996:328:129–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sedel L. Evolution of alumina-on-alumina implants: a review. Clin Orthop 2000; 379:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Toni A, Terzi S, Sudanese A, Bianchi G. Fractures of ceramic components in total hip arthroplasty. Hip int. 2000:10:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  11. Toni A, Sudanese A, Paderni S, Guerra E. Ceramic-on-Ceramic: Long-term clinical experience. Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag 2001: 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boheler M, Knahr K, Plank H, Walter A, Salzer N, Schiriber V. Long term results of uncemented alumina acetabular implants. J Bone J Surg Br 1994; 76: 53–9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Sayanes, JM Minuesa. Ceramic-ceramic prosthesis after 10 years. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11:773–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gualtieri G, Nirgrisoli M, Dallari D, Catamo L, Gualtieri I. A study of the mechanical and biological behaviour of bioceramic hip arthroplasty followed up after more than 10 years. Chir Organi Mov 1993; 78:213–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Giacometti Ceroni R., Dalla Pria P. The development of large ceramic heads to obtain more stable THA with wider range of motion. Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Vergal 2001: 11–2

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer TW, Hashimoto Y. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 305–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nessutt R, Wimmer MA, Schneider E, Morlock MM. The influence of resting periods on friction in the artificial hip. Clin Orthop 2003; 407: 127–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zagra L, Marciano E, Giacometti Ceroni R. Alumina-on-alumina coupling with 36 mm heads. Hip Int 2002; 12:200

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds ISR. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone J Surg Br 1982; 63:214–8

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cabanela ME. Is the posterior approach to THA a choice for all season. Orthopedics 2000; 23: 422

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jean-Yves Lazennec Martin Dietrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zagra, L., Giacometti Ceroni, R., Corbella, M. (2004). THA Ceramic-Ceramic Coupling: The Evaluation of the Dislocation Rate with Bigger Heads. In: Lazennec, JY., Dietrich, M. (eds) Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty. Ceramics in Orthopaedics. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1968-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1968-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1462-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1968-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics