Abstract
The history of just-world research is almost 50 years old and still shows continuously increasing publication rates. In these 50 years, two clearly different phases can be distinguished. Up to the end of the 1980s, studies predominantly concentrated on the effects of just-world beliefs (BJW) on victims of injustice, misfortune or failure. These studies portrayed BJW as an anti-social trait which makes people prone to disdain their fellow people, to exclude minorities, to devalue innocent victims and to pursue them with blame and reproach. Since more than 15 years ago a distinctive change can be observed: From then on, studies have concentrated on the positive functions of BJW. These more recent studies present BJW as a personal resource which subserves people in manifold ways in everyday life: It allows individuals to invest time and energy in long-term goals and future-oriented activities, it facilitates the development of trust in other people and society, and it provides a conceptual framework which helps to find meaning in the events of life. These different findings involve rather different explicit and implicit valuations of the just-world phenomenon. While it seemed reasonable in the first phase to view BJW in a negative light, to advise against it and to restrain its detrimental effects, the phenomenon is judged much more positively in recent years, its benefits are highlighted, and its promotion is considered. The current paper attempts to combine the two perspectives again: The originally observed rather detrimental effects should not be forgotten when looking at the more recently found rather positively connoted effects. Both might be two sides of the same medal: It is just because BJW has so manifold positive functions and can be used as a personal resource that individuals are so reluctant to give it up only because of contradicting evidence in everyday life. We illustrate the connection of these two sides with data from three studies including the formerly used variables as well as the more recently considered variables.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albee, G. W. (1986). Toward a just society: Lessons from observations on the primary prevention of psychopathology. American Psychologist, 41, 891–898.
Brandtstädter, J. (1977). Normkritik als Voraussetzung pädagogisch-psychologischer Praxis [Norm criticism as a basis for educational-psychological practice]. Trierer Psychologische Berichte, 4(1).
Brandtstädter, J. (1980). Vom Sein zum Sollen in der Theorie des Moralischen Urteils. Wege, Schleichwege, Irrwege [From is to ought in the theory of the moral judgment. Routes, rat runs, meanders]. In L. H. Eckensberger & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Entwicklung sozialer Kognitionen: Modelle, Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungen (pp. 133–145). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Brandtstädter, J., & Montada, L. (1980). Normative Implikationen der Erziehungsstilforschung [Normative implications of research on edicational styles]. In K. A. Schneewind & T. Herrmann (Eds.), Erziehungsstilforschung. Theorien, Methoden und Anwendung der Sozialpsychologie elterlichen Erziehungsverhaltens (pp. 33–55). Bern: Huber.
Connors, J., & Heaven, P. C. (1990). Belief in a just world and attitudes toward AIDS sufferers. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 559–560.
Dalbert, C. (1997). Coping with an unjust fate: The case of structural unemployment. Social Justice Research, 2, 175–189.
Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Plenum Press.
Dalbert, C., & Katona-Sallay, H. (1996). The “belief in a just world” construct in Hungary. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 293–314.
Dalbert, C., & Maes, J. (2002). Belief in a just word as a personal resource in school. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Furnham, A. (2003a). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.
Furnham, A. (2003b). Just world beliefs are good for you. Contemporary Psychology, 48, 179–181.
Furnham, A., & Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365–384.
Glennon, F., & Joseph, S. (1993). Just world beliefs, self esteem, and attitudes towards homosexuals with AIDS. Psychological Reports, 72, 584–586.
Hafer, C. L. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073.
Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, development and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167.
Harper, D. J., & Manasse, P. R. (1992). The just world and the third world: British explanations for poverty abroad. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 783–785.
Johnson, C., & Dickinson, J. (1971). Class differences in derogation of an innocent victim. University of St. Xavier: Unpublished manuscript (quoted in: Lerner, Miller & Holmes, 1976).
Jones, C., & Aronson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.
Kaiser, A., Lüken, A., Maes, J., & Winkels, R. (1994). Schulzeitverkürzung – Auf der Suche nach dem bildungspolitischen Kompromiß [On shortening the school period – Searching for a compromise in educational politics]. Grundlagen der Weiterbildung. Zeitschrift für Weiterbildung und Bildungspolitik im In- und Ausland, 5, 219–223.
Kleinke, C. L., & Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 343–353.
Latta, R. M., Bernhardt, V. L., Hildebrand, P. K., & Kahn, A. S. (1974). Attraction to a Brandtstädter, J. (1977). Normkritik als Voraussetzung pädagogisch-psychologischer Praxis victim: Balance theory or “the just world”? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 107–109.
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360.
Lerner, M. J. (1974). Social psychology of justice and interpersonal attraction. In T. Huston (Ed.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 331–351). New York: Academic Press.
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive in social behavior. Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.
Lerner, M. J. (1978). …but nobody liked the Indians. “Belief in a just world” versus a “Authoritarism” syndrome. Ethnicity, 5, 229–237.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.
Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., & Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 133–162). New York: Academic Press.
Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210.
Lincoln, A., & Levinger, G. (1972). Observers’ evaluation of the victim and the attacker in an aggression incident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 202–210.
MacLean, M. J., & Chown, S. M. (1988). Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 26, 249–260.
Maes, J. (1997). Nicht-kognitive Persönlichkeitsmerkmale [Non-cognitive personality traits]. In Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Weiterbildung Rheinland-Pfalz (Ed.), Entwicklung und Erprobung von Modellen der Begabtenförderung am Gymnasium mit Verkürzung der Schulzeit. Abschlußbericht [Schulversuche und Bildungsforschung, 80] (pp. 89–102). Mainz: Hase & Koehler.
Maes, J. (1998). Eight stages in the development of research on the construct of belief in a just world? In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 163–185). New York: Plenum.
Maes, J. (2007). Gerechtigkeitsempfinden und das Lernen in der Weiterbildung [The sense of justice and learning in further education]. In A. Kaiser, R. Kaiser, & K.-H. Hohmann (Eds.), Lernertypen – Lernumgebung – Lernerfolg. Erwachsene im Lernfeld (pp. 60–80). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann Verlag.
Maes, J., & Kals, E. (2002). Justice beliefs in school: Distinguishing ultimate and immanent justice. Social Justice Research, 15, 227–244.
Maes, J., & Montada, L. (1989). Verantwortlichkeit für “Schicksalsschläge”: Eine Pilotstudie [Responsibility for “strokes of fate”: A pilot study]. Psychologische Beiträge, 31, 107–124.
Maes, J., & Tarnai, C. (2008). Implizite Wertungen in psychologischen Forschungsprogrammen: Das Doppelgesicht der Gerechte-Welt-Motivation [Implicit evaluations in psychological research programs: The two-faced character of just-world-motivation]. In E. Witte (Ed.), Sozialpsychologie und Werte (pp. 89–108). Lengerich: Pabst.
McDonald, A. P. (1973). A time for introspection. Professional Psychology, 4, 35–42.
McDonald, G. W. (1977). Innocent victim, deserved victim and martyr: Observers’ reactions. Psychological Reports, 41, 511–514.
Montada, L. (1991). Life stress, injustice, and the question “who is responsible?”. In H. Steensma & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Social justice in human relations (Vol. 2, pp. 9–30). New York: Plenum Press.
Montada, L. (1992). Attribution of responsibility for losses and perceived injustice. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises and the experience of loss in adulthood (pp. 133–161). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Montada, L. (1998a). Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and self-interest? In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 217–246). New York: Plenum.
Montada, L. (1998b). Justice: Just a rational choice? Social Justice Research, 12, 81–101.
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313–344.
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1991). Justice and prosocial commitments. In L. Montada & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Altruism in social systems (pp. 58–81). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Murphy-Berman, V., & Berman, J. J. (1990). The effect of respondents’ just world beliefs and target person’s social worth and awareness-of-risk on perceptions of a person with AIDS. Social Justice Research, 4, 215–228.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another’s lot: A study of participants in the National Draft Lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 29(4), 73–93.
Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 65–89.
Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York: Pantheon.
Simons, C., & Piliavin, J. A. (1972). The effect of deception on reactions to a victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 56–60.
Solomon, R. C. (1989). The emotions of justice. Social Justice Research, 3, 345–374.
Stein, G. M. (1973). Children’s reactions to innocent victims. Child Development, 29, 73–93.
Stokols, D., & Schopler, J. (1973). Reactions to victims under conditions of situational detachment: The effects of responsibility, severity, and expected future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 199–209.
Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive, psychological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732–740.
Wagstaff, G. F. (1982). Attitudes to rape: The just world “strikes again”? Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 35, 277–279.
Wagstaff, G. F. (1983). Correlates of the just world in Britain. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 145–146.
Zuckerman, M., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1977). Belief in a just word and trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 306–317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maes, J., Tarnai, C., Schuster, J. (2011). About Is and Ought in Research on Belief in a Just World: The Janus-Faced Just-World Motivation. In: Kals, E., Maes, J. (eds) Justice and Conflicts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19035-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19034-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19035-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)