Abstract
Twitter enjoys enormous popularity as a micro-blogging service largely due to its simplicity. On the downside, there is little organization to the Twitterverse and making sense of the stream of messages passing through the system has become a significant challenge for everyone involved. As a solution, Twitter users have adopted the convention of adding a hash at the beginning of a word to turn it into a hashtag. Hashtags have become the means in Twitter to create threads of conversation and to build communities around particular interests.
In this paper, we take a first look at whether hashtags behave as strong identifiers, and thus whether they could serve as identifiers for the Semantic Web. We introduce some metrics that can help identify hashtags that show the desirable characteristics of strong identifiers. We look at the various ways in which hashtags are used, and show through evaluation that our metrics can be applied to detect hashtags that represent real world entities.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Al-Khalifa, H.S., Davis, H.C.: Exploring the value of folksonomies for creating semantic metadata. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (2007)
Ames, M., Naaman, M.: Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In: Proc. of CHI (2007)
Angeletou, S.: Semantic enrichment of folksonomy tagspaces. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 889–894. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Benz, D., Grobelnik, M., Hotho, A., Jaschke, R., Mladenic, D., Servedio, V.D.P., Sizov, S., Szomszor, M.: Analyzing tag semantics across collaborative tagging systems. In: Dagstuhl Seminar 08391 - Working Group Summary (2008)
Cattuto, C., Benz, D., Hotho, A., Stumme, G.: Semantic grounding of tag relatedness in social bookmarking systems. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 615–631. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Chi, E.H., Mytkowicz, T.: Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory. In: Proc. of HT (2008)
Farooq, U., Kannampallil, T.G., Song, Y., Ganoe, C.H., Carroll, J.M., Giles, L.: Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: metrics and design heuristics. In: Proc. of GROUP (2007)
Golder, S.A., Huberman, B.A.: Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci. (2006)
Huang, J., Thornton, K.M., Efthimiadis, E.N.: Conversational tagging in twitter. In: Proc. of HT (2010)
Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M., Wu, F.: Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday (2009)
Kipp, M.E.: @toread and cool: Subjective, affective and associative factors in tagging. In: Proc. of CAIS/ACSI (2008)
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proc. of WWW (2010)
Krner, C., Benz, D., Strohmaier, M., Hotho, A., Stumme, G.: Stop thinking, start tagging - tag semantics emerge from collaborative verbosity. In: Proc. of WWW (2010)
Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J., Decker, S.: Understanding how twitter is used to widely spread scientific messages. In: Proc. of WebSci. (2010)
Limpens, F., Monnin, A., Gandon, F., Laniado, D.: Speech acts meet tagging: NiceTag ontology. In: Proc. of I-SEMANTICS (2010)
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, D., Davis, M.: Ht06, tagging paper, taxonomy, flickr, academic article, to read. In: Proc. of HT (2006)
Mika, P.: Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 522–536. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Passant, A., Hastrup, T., Bojars, U., Breslin, J.: Microblogging: A semantic web and distributed approach. In: Proc. of SFSW (2008)
Passant, A., Laublet, P.: Meaning of a tag: A collaborative approach to bridge the gap between tagging and linked data. In: Proc. of LDOW (2008)
Raghavan, V.V., Wong, S.K.M.: A critical analysis of vector space model for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986)
Salton, G.: Automatic Text Processing – The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)
Sen, S., Lam, S.K., Rashid, A.M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., Harper, F.M., Riedl, J.: Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In: Proc. of CSCW (2006)
Wagner, C., Strohmaier, M.: The wisdom in tweetonomies: Acquiring latent conceptual structures from social awareness streams. In: Proc. of SemSearch (2010)
Wu, X., Zhang, L., Yu, Y.: Exploring social annotations for the semantic web. In: Proc. of WWW (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Laniado, D., Mika, P. (2010). Making Sense of Twitter. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010. ISWC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6496. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17745-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17746-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)