Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Performativity of Theories

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Philosophy of Management

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explain how organization and management studies have built on and helped advance various streams of research dedicated to the performativity of theory – that is, how theory shapes the patterns of social interactions that constitute social reality. For that purpose, two ideal-type positions that form the poles of a continuum of scholarship about theory performativity are distinguished. These poles consist of approaching either performativity as a mindset – an onto-epistemic lens helpful to reconsider the nature or organizational phenomena and management concepts – or of analyzing performativity as a social mechanism involved in the production and transformation of social reality for actors. By relying on illustrations from recent research, the common core assumptions underlying both perspectives on performativity can be specified as well as these perspectives’ distinctive commitments to these assumptions, analytical foci, and contribution to organizational knowledge of performativity. Finally, the chapter discusses how the insights generated at each pole of this continuum complement each other and can advance organizational and management studies of theory performativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin JL (1962) How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar E (1978) From Bachelard to Althusser: the concept of “epistemological break”. Econ Soc 7(3):207–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad K (2007) Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes B (1983) Social life as bootstrapped induction. Sociology 17(4):524–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek JM (2020) Accomplishing impact by performing our theories: it can be done, though not easily. J Appl Behav Sci 56(1):11–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2014) Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: the paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships. J Manag 40:1181–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Beunza D, Ferraro F (2019) Performative work: bridging performativity and institutional theory in the responsible investment field. Organ Stud 40(4):515–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgoin A, Bencherki N, Faraj S (2020) “And who are you?”: a performative perspective on authority in organizations. Acad Manag J 63(4):1134–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden V, Gond J-P, Nyberg D, Wright C (2021) Turning back the rising sea: theory performativity in the shift from climate science to popular authority. Organ Stud 42(12):1909–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxenbaum E, Jones C, Meyer RE, Svejenova S (2018) Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. Organ Stud 39(5–6):597–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (1990) Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (1997) Excitable speech: a politics of the performative. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabantous L, Gond J-P (2011) Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality’s éternel retour. Organ Sci 22(3):573–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabantous L, Gond J-P (2015) The resistible rise of Bayesian thinking in management: historical lessons from decision analysis. J Manag 41(2):441–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabantous L, Sergi V (2018) Seeing the potentialities at the intersection: a reflection on performativity and processuality mindsets. M@n@gement 21(4):1229–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabantous L, Gond J-P, Johnson-Cramer M (2010) Decision theory as practice: crafting rationality in organizations. Organ Stud 31(11):1531–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabantous L, Gond J-P, Harding N, Learmonth M (2016) Critical essay: reconsidering critical performativity. Hum Relat 69(2):197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: Power, action, and belief: a new sociology of knowledge, vol 32. Routledge, London, pp 196–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1998) Laws of the markets. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (2016) Revisiting marketization: from interface-markets to market-agencements. Consum Mark Cult 19(1):17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton G (2020) How assemblages change when theories become performative: the case of the Blue Ocean Strategy. Organ Stud 41(10):1417–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton G, Mouricou P (2017) Is management research relevant? A systematic analysis of the rigor-relevance debate in top-tier journals (1994–2013). M@n@gement 20(2):166–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton G, Ungureanu P (2018) Bridging the research-practice divide: a study of scholar-practitioners’ multiple role management strategies and knowledge spillovers across roles. J Manag Inq 27(4):436–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier C, Langley A (2020) What makes a process theoretical contribution? Organ Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720902473

  • Cooper R, Burrell G (1988) Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: an introduction. Organ Stud 9(1):91–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooren F (2004) Textual agency: how texts do things in organizational settings. Organization 11(3):373–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Adderio L (2008) The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Res Policy 37(5):769–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Adderio L, Pollock N (2014) Performing modularity: competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization. Organ Stud 35(12):1813–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Adderio L, Glaser V, Pollock N (2019) Performing theories, transforming organizations: a reply to Marti and Gond. Acad Manag Rev 44(3):676–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis J (2006) Préface: Les nouveaux visages de la performativité. Étud Commun Lang Inf Médiat 29:8–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J (1979) Signature event context. Glyph 1:172–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganova L, Eyquem-Renault M (2009) What do business models do?: innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Res Policy 38(10):1559–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupret K (2019) Performative silences: potentiality of organizational change. Organ Stud 40(5):681–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden D (1984) Self-fulfilling prophecy as a management tool: harnessing Pygmalion. Acad Manag Rev 9(1):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esper SC, Cabantous L, Barin-Cruz L, Gond J-P (2017) Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises. Organization 24(5):671–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm Sci Q 48(1):94–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro F, Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2005) Economics language and assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling. Acad Manag Rev 30:8–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish SE (1982) With the compliments of the author: reflections on Austin and Derrida. Crit Inq 8(4):693–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming P, Banerjee SB (2016) When performativity fails: implications for critical management studies. Hum Relat 69(2):257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Ford LW (1995) The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):541–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier V, Grey C (2000) At the critical moment: conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Hum Relat 53(1):7–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud R, Gehman J (2019) Performativity: not a destination but an ongoing journey. Acad Manag Rev 44(3):679–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud R, Gehman J, Tharchen T (2018) Performativity as ongoing journeys: implications for strategy, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Long Range Plan 51(3):500–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad Manag Learn Educ 4:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser VL (2017) Design performances: how organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Acad Manag J 60(6):2126–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gond J-P, Cabantous L (2015) Performativity: towards a performative turn in organisational studies. In: Mir R, Willmott H, Greenwood M (eds) The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies. Routledge, London, pp 508–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond J-P, Cabantous L, Harding N, Learmonth M (2016) What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. Int J Manag Rev 18(4):440–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gond J-P, Mena S, Mosonyi S (2020) The performativity of literature reviewing: constituting the corporate social responsibility literature through re-presentation and intervention. Organ Res Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935494

  • Grossmann-Hensel B, Seidl D (2021) Problematizing the Relation Between Management Research and Practice. In: Neesham, C. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_57-1

  • Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harding N (2004) The social construction of management. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann-Pillath C (2016) Performative mechanisms. In: Enacting dismal science. Springer, New York, pp 53–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Huault I, Kärreman D, Perret V, Spicer A (2017) Introduction to the special issue: the evolving debate about critical performativity. M@n@gement 20(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang R-C, Li Z-F, Huang C-T, Chu R-X, Fan X (2010) Dropping the brand of Edinburgh school: an interview with Barry Barnes. East Asian Sci Technol Soc 4(4):601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung J, Shin T (2019) Learning not to diversify: the transformation of graduate business education and the decline of diversifying acquisitions. Adm Sci Q 64(2):337–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser A, Nicolai AT, Seidl D (2015) The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. Acad Manag Ann 9(1):143–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger M, Clegg S (2011) Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030. Strateg Organ 9(2):136–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T, Ashcraft KL, Cooren F (2017) The work of communication: relational perspectives on working and organizing in contemporary capitalism. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad Manag J 56(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1996) Que peuvent apporter l’histoire et la sociologie des sciences aux sciences de gestion ? In: Penan H (ed) XIII Journées Nationales des IAE. IAE Toulouse, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Law J (2008) On sociology and STS. Sociol Rev 56(4):623–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leca B, Barin-Cruz L (2021) Enabling critical performativity: the role of institutional context and critical performative work. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508421995759

  • Lewis MW, Grimes AI (1999) Metatriangulation: building theory from multiple paradigms. Acad Manag Rev 24(4):672–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligonie M (2018) The “forced performativity” of a strategy concept: exploring how shared value shaped a gambling company’s strategy. Long Range Plan 51(3):463–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loxley J (2007) Performativity – the new critical idiom. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard J-F (1984) The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DA (2006) An engine, not a camera. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DA (2007) Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivates markets. In: MacKenzie DA, Muniesa F, Siu L (eds) Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 54–86

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DA, Millo Y (2003) Constructing a market, performing theory: the historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange1. Am J Sociol 109(1):107–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti E, Gond J-P (2018) When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring the boundary conditions of performativity. Acad Manag Rev 43(3):487–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti E, Gond J-P (2019) How do theories become self-fulfilling? Clarifying the process of Barnesian performativity. Acad Manag Rev 44(3):686–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton RK (1949) On sociological theories of the middle range. In: Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster, New York, pp 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa F (2014) The provoked economy: economic reality and the performative turn. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa F (2018) Grappling with the performative condition. Long Range Plan 51(3):495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa F, Callon M (2007) Economic experiments and the construction of markets. In: MacKenzie DA, Muniesa F, Siu L (eds) Do economists make markets?: on the performativity of economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 163–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg D (2009) Computers, customer service operatives and cyborgs: intra-actions in call centres. Organ Stud 30(11):1181–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ Stud 28(9):1435–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ Sci 25(3):868–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palo T, Mason K, Roscoe P (2020) Performing a myth to make a market: the construction of the “magical world” of Santa. Organ Stud 41(1):53–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering A (1994) After representation: science studies in the performative idiom. In: PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol 1994(2), pp 413–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering A (1995) The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki TR, Knorr-Cetina K, von Savigny E (2001) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneborn D, Scherer AG (2012) Clandestine organizations, al Qaeda, and the paradox of (in)visibility: a response to Stohl and Stohl. Organ Stud 33(7):963–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl D, Whittington R (2014) Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organ Stud 35(10):1407–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadnam M (2019) A postpositivist commentary on self-fulfilling theories. Acad Manag Rev 44(3):684–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smircich L (1983) Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Adm Sci Q 28(3):339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer A, Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2009) Critical performativity: the unfinished business of critical management studies. Hum Relat 62(4):537–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe AL (1991) The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philos Soc Sci 21(3):367–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JR, Van Every EJ (1999) The emergent organization: communication as its site and surface. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N (1999) Steps to an ecology of place. In: Massey D, Allen J, Sarre P (eds) Human geography today. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 295–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N (2008) Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler M, Cohen L (2010) Spaces that matter: gender performativity and organizational space. Organ Stud 31(2):175–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickert C, Schaefer SM (2015) Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Hum Relat 68(1):107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bayes Business School, City, University of London, London, UK

    Jean-Pascal Gond

  2. Emlyon Business School, Écully, France

    Guillaume Carton

Authors
  1. Jean-Pascal Gond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillaume Carton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Pascal Gond .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Cristina Neesham

  2. Professur für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Universitaet Leuphana, Lüneburg, Germany

    Markus Reihlen

  3. Dept of Management, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    Dennis Schoeneborn

Section Editor information

  1. Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Professur für Strategisches Management, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland

    Markus Reihlen

  2. Department of Management, Society & Communication (MSC), Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Dänemark

    Dennis Schoeneborn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gond, JP., Carton, G. (2022). The Performativity of Theories. In: Neesham, C., Reihlen, M., Schoeneborn, D. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_56-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_56-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation