Skip to main content

Timing Is Key for Robot Trust Repair

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9388))

Abstract

Even the best robots will eventually make a mistake while performing their tasks. In our past experiments, we have found that even one mistake can cause a large loss in trust by human users. In this paper, we evaluate the effects of a robot apologizing for its mistake, promising to do better in the future, and providing additional reasons to trust it in a simulated office evacuation conducted in a virtual environment. In tests with 319 participants, we find that each of these techniques can be successful at repairing trust if they are used when the robot asks the human to trust it again, but are not successful when used immediately after the mistake. The implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, D.J., Clark, M.H.: Methodology for study of human-robot social interaction in dangerous situations. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pp. 371–376. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berinsky, A.J., Huber, G.A., Lenz, G.S.: Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis 20(3), 351–368 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, P.H., Dirks, K.T., Cooper, C.D., Ferrin, D.L.: When more blame is better than less: the implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence-vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99(1), 49–65 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C.F., Quartz, S.R., Montague, P.R.: Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science 308(5718), 78–83 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46(1), 50–80 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Ipeirotis, P.: Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5(5), 411–419 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinette, P., Howard, A.: Emergency evacuation robot design. ANS EPRRSD - 13th Robotics & Remote Systems for Hazardous Environments and 11th Emergency Preparedness & Response (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robinette, P., Howard, A.: Incorporating a model of human panic behavior for robotic-based emergency evacuation. In: 2011 IEEE on RO-MAN, pp. 47–52. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robinette, P., Howard, A.: Trust in emergency evacuation robots. In: 10th IEEE International Symposium on Safety Security and Rescue Robotics (SSRR 2012) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robinette, P., Vela, P., Howard, A.: Information propagation applied to robot-assisted evacuation. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robinette, P., Wagner, A., Howard, A.: Assessment of robot guidance modalities conveying instructions to humans in emergency situations. In: 2014 IEEE on RO-MAN. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robinette, P., Wagner, A.R., Howard, A.M.: The effect of robot performance on human-robot trust in time-critical situations. Tech. Rep. GT-IRIM-HumAns-2015-001, Georgia Institute of Technology. Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines, January 2015

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schweitzer, M.E., Hershey, J.C., Bradlow, E.T.: Promises and lies: restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 101(1), 1–19 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shell, D., Mataric, M.: Insights toward robot-assisted evacuation. Advanced Robotics 19(8), 797–818 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson, J.A.: Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(5), 264–268 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, A.R.: The role of trust and relationships in human-robot social interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Robinette .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Robinette, P., Howard, A.M., Wagner, A.R. (2015). Timing Is Key for Robot Trust Repair. In: Tapus, A., André, E., Martin, JC., Ferland, F., Ammi, M. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9388. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25553-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25554-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics