Skip to main content

Toward an Open Learning Analytics Ecosystem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education

Abstract

In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in learning analytics (LA) in technology-enhanced learning (TEL). LA approaches share a movement from data to analysis to action to learning. The TEL landscape is changing. Learning is increasingly happening in open and networked learning environments, characterized by increasing complexity and fast-paced change. This should be reflected in the conceptualization and development of innovative LA approaches in order to achieve more effective learning experiences. There is a need to provide understanding into how learners learn in these environments and how learners, educators, institutions, and researchers can best support this process. In this chapter, we discuss open learning analytics as an emerging research field that has the potential to deal with the challenges in open and networked environments and present key conceptual and technical ideas toward an open learning analytics ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, S., Berg, A., Clow, D., Dawson, S., Duval, E., et al.(2014), OLA Press Release. Retrieved from http://solaresearch.org/initiatives/ola/.

  • Benson, T. (2012). Why interoperability is hard. In Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED, Health Information Technology Standards (pp. 21–32). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomas, E. (2014). How to give students control of their data. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/blog/give-students-control-data/.

  • Brusilovsky, P., & Millan, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web, LNCS 4321 (pp. 3–53). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavoukian, A. (2009). Privacy by Design The 7 Foundational Principles. Retrieved from https://www.privacybydesign.ca/content/uploads/2009/08/7foundationalprinciples.pdf.

  • Chatti, M. A. (2010). The LaaN theory. In Personalization in technology enhanced learning: A social software perspective (pp. 19–42). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Thüs, H., & Schroeder, U. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 318–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatti, M. A., Lukarov, V., Thüs, H., Muslim, A., Yousef, A. M. F., Wahid, U., et al. (2014). Learning analytics: Challenges and future research directions. eleed, Iss.10. (urn:nbn:de:0009-5-40350).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clow, D. (2012). The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 134–138). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2013). Learning analytics interoperability—A survey of current literature and candidate standards. Retrieved from http://blogs.cetis.ac.uk/adam/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2013/05/learninganalytics-interoperability-v1p1.pdf.

  • Cooper, A. (2014a). Open learning analytics network—Summit Europe 2014. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/open-learning-analytics-network-summit-europe-2014/.

  • Cooper, A. (2014b). Learning analytics and interoperability—The big picture in brief. Learning Analytics Review, March 2014, ISSN: 2057-7494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2014c). Standards and specifications—Quick reference guide. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/dpc/standards-specifications-quick-reference-guide/.

  • Daniel, B., & Butson, R. (2014). Foundations of big data and analytics in higher education. In International Conference on Analytics Driven Solutions: ICAS2014 (pp. 39–47). Academic Conferences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S., GaÅ¡ević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 231–240). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dringus, L. P. (2012). Learning analytics considered harmful. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, E. (2011). Attention please!: Learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 9–17). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Sitlia, H. (2011). The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. In Proceedings of the LAK ’11 Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 104–109).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J., Schroeder, R., & den Besten, M. (2009). Open science in e-science: Contingency or policy? Journal of Documentation, 65(1), 6–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2006). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardjono, T. (Ed.). (2015). User Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0. Retrieved from http://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-uma-core.html

  • Hilton, J., Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The four R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(1), 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, T. (2014). Standards and learning analytics—current activities 2014. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/blog/standards-learning-analytics-current-activity-2014/.

  • Kay, J., & Kummerfeld, B. (2011). Lifelong learner modeling. In P. J. Durlach & A. M. Lesgold (Eds.), Adaptive technologies for training and education (pp. 140–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S. J. D., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., & Stamper, J. (2010). A data repository for the EDM community: The PSLC DataShop. In C. Romero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, & R. S. J. D. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of educational data mining (pp. 43–56). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laney, D. (2001). 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity, and variety, application delivery strategies. META Group. Retrieved March 6, 2015, from http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-DataVolume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf

  • Laney, D. (2012). The importance of ‘Big Data’: A definition. Gartner. Retrieved March 6, 2015, from http://www.gartner.com/resId=2057415.

  • Liu, B. (2006). Web data mining. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H., (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, R. (2009). Introduction to Information Visualization. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, T. (2012). Open Education: Emergence and Identity. Retrieved February 5, 2015, from http://oh-institute.org/external_resources/pub/McNamara-OpenEd_Emergence_Identity-CC-by.pdf.

  • Moody, D. L. (2003). Measuring the quality of data models: An empirical evaluation of the use of quality metrics in practice. In Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Information Systems, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. Report. ISBN-978-92-64-03174-6. Retrieved February 5, 2015, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/givingknowledgeforfreetheemergenceofopeneducationalresources.htm.

  • Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2008). The history and emergent paradigm of open education. In Open education and education for openness (pp. 3–16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., and S. Ventura. Educational data mining: A review of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 40(6):601–618, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclater, N. (2014). Examining open learning analytics—report from the Lace Project meeting in Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://www.laceproject.eu/blog/examining-open-learning-analytics-reportlace-project-meeting-amsterdam/.

  • Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., Haythornthwaite, C., Dawson, S., Shum, S. B., Ferguson, R., et al. (2011). Open learning analytics: An integrated & modularized platform. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G.; Long, P.: Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. In: EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), September/October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1509–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thüs, H., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (in review). Context capturing and modeling in open learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education Society (IJAIED), IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Drachsler, H., Manouselis, N., Wolpers, M., Vuorikari, R., & Duval, E. (2011, February). Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 44–53). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., & Duval, E. (2012). Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., & Klerkx, J. (2014). Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1499–1514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, D. (2009). Introduction to Open Education. iTunesU. Lecture conducted from BYU, Provo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L., Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. A white paper. Retrieved February 5, 2015, from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Amine Chatti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chatti, M.A., Muslim, A., Schroeder, U. (2017). Toward an Open Learning Analytics Ecosystem. In: Kei Daniel, B. (eds) Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06520-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06520-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06519-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06520-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics