Abstract
Citizens are increasingly expected and even required to go online for much of their interaction with government, making the skills citizens bring to these encounters particularly important. Several skillsets for the use of online resources have been proposed in the general e-government literature. However, few empirical studies explore the experiences and strategies of citizens themselves related to the role of skills in their interaction with government. Consequently, there is a gap in the knowledge regarding which skills are specifically relevant when dealing with government online. To explore this gap, this paper presents a qualitative analysis of interviews with citizens in Danish municipal service centres. The analysis takes its departure in a review of the literature that addresses aspects of skills relevant for the (digital) citizen-government encounter. The paper contributes to the e-government literature, by introducing the concept of domain-skills as a central skill set for citizen self-service. Domain-skills constitute a scaffolding citizens can build on, when looking for and interpreting information and contextualizing it to their situation, making it easier for them to act on their own, with confidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This information is from the interview, but not part of the quote.
- 2.
The source of population data is the Danish Statistical Databank, except when otherwise stated.
References
Allina-Pisano, J.: How to Tell an Axe Murderer: an essay on ethnography, truths and lies. In: Schatz, E. (ed.) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009)
Alvesson, M.: At home ethnography. In: Ybema, S., et al. (eds.) Organizational Ethnography. Sage, London (2009)
Andersson, A., Grönlund, Å.: e-Society accessibility: identifying research gaps. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2739, pp. 15–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/10929179_2
Barnard, E., Cloete, L., Patel, H.: Language and technology literacy barriers to accessing government services. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2739, pp. 37–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/10929179_6
Belanger, F., Carter, L.: The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Commun. ACM 52, 132–135 (2009)
Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T.: The e-government paradox: better customer service does not necessarily cost less. Government Inf. Q. 25(2), 149–154 (2008)
Byström, K., Järvelin, K.: Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Inf. Process. Manage. 31(2), 191–213 (1995)
Casacuberta, D.: Informational literacy. In: Anttiroiko, A.-V., Malkia, M. (eds.) The Encyclopaedia of Digital Government, pp. 1083–1088. IGI, London (2007)
Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage Publications, London (2006)
Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1), 3–21 (1990)
Czarniawska, B.: Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural Perspective. SAGE, London (1992)
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E.: From the “Digital Divide” to “Digital Inequality”: studying internet use as penetration increases. In: Centre for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University. Working Paper Series 15 (2001)
Ebbers, W.E., Jansen, M.G., van Deursen, A.J.: Impact of the digital divide on e-government: expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(4), 685–692 (2016)
Evans, V., Green, M.: Cognitive Linguistics – An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2006)
Fairclough, N.: Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Cambridge (1992)
Flybjerg, B.: Fem misforståelser om casestudiet. In: Brinkmann, Svend & Tanggaard, Lene (red.): Kvalitative metoder - en Grundbog. København, Hans Reitzels Forlag (2010)
Gee, J.P.: The narrativization of experience in the oral style. J. Educ. 167(1), 9–35 (1985)
Gordon, L.K.: Bureaucratic competence and success in dealing with public bureaucracies. Soc. Probl. 23(2), 197–208 (1975)
Grönlund, Å., Hatakka, M., Ask, A.: Inclusion in the e-service society – investigating administrative literacy requirements for using e-services. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 216–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74444-3_19
Heeks, R., Bailur, S.: Analysing eGoverment research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods and practices. In: E-government Working paper Series. Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (2006)
Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, R.J., Ferro, E.: Understanding the complexity of electronic government: implications from the digital divide literature. Gov. Inf. Q. 26, 89–97 (2009)
Katz, D., Gutek, B., Kahn, R.L. Barton, E.: Bureaucratic Encounters. University of Michigan Survey Research Centre, Ann Arbor (1975)
Klaassen, R., Karreman, J., van der Geest, T.: Designing government portal navigation around citizens’ needs. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (eds.) EGOV 2006. LNCS, vol. 4084, pp. 162–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_15
Kolsaker, A., Lee-Kelley, L.: Citizen-centric e-government: a critique of the UK model. Electron. Gov. 3(2), 127–138 (2006)
Kvale, S.: Interview. En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. København, Hans Reitzels Forlag (1997)
Layder, D.: Sociological Practice - Linking Theory and Social Research. Sage Publications, London (1998)
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C.Ø., Hofmann, S., Melin, U.: Close encounters of the digital kind: a research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Gov. Inf. Q. 36(3), 427–436 (2019)
Madsen, C.Ø., Christensen, L.R.: Integrated and seamless? Single Parents’ experiences of cross-organizational interaction. In: Selected Papers of the IRIS, Issue Nr 9 (2019)
Madsen, C.Ø., Kræmmergaard, P.: The efficiency of freedom. Single parents’ domestication of mandatory e-government. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 380–388 (2015)
Madsen, C.Ø., Kræmmergaard, P.: Warm experts in the age of mandatory e-application for public benefits. Electron. J. e-Gov. 14(1), 87–98 (2016)
Madsen, C.Ø., Hofmann, S., Pieterson, W.: Channel choice complications. In: Lindgren, I., Janssen, M., Lee, H., Polini, A., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., Scholl, H.J., Tambouris, E. (eds.) EGOV 2019. LNCS, vol. 11685, pp. 139–151. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_11
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., Chin, W.: Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. Data Base 32, 86–112 (2001)
Maynard-Moddi, S., Musheno, M.: Cops, Teachers, Counsellors - Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. University of Michigan Press (2003)
Morgenson, F.V., Van Maburg, D., Mithas, S.: Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. J. Admin. Res. Theory Adv. Access (2010)
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C.J., Stansbury, M.: Virtual Inequality - Beyond the Digital Divide. Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C. (2003)
Münscher, R., Kühlmann, T.M.: Using critical incident technique in trust research. In: Lyon, F., Mollering, G., Saunders, M.N.K. (eds.) Handbook of Research Methods on Trust. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2012)
Norris, P.: Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)
Pieterson, W.: Channel Choice – Citizens Channel Behaviour and Public Service Channel Strategy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente (2009)
Reddick, C.G.: Citizen initiated contacts with government comparing phones and websites. J. E-Gov. 2(1), 27–53 (2005)
Schwartz-Shea, P.: Judging quality – evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In: Yanow, D., Schwartz-Shea, P. (eds.) Interpretation and Method, pp 91–109. M.E. Sharp, New York (2006)
Scott, M., DeLone, W.H. Golden, W.: IT quality and eGovernment Net benefits: a citizen’s perspective. In: 31st International Conference on Information Systems, St. Louis (2010)
Skaarup, S.: The Mediation of Authority - How citizens perceive and engage the mediations of the Bureaucratic Service Encounter and changes in its mediation matrix. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southern Denmark (2016)
Small, M.L.: “How many cases do I need?”: on science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10(1), 5–38 (2009)
Technological Institute: Analyse af Danskernes IKT færdigheder. Taastrup, Teknologisk Institut (2005)
Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media Soc. 13(6), 893–911 (2010)
Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., Helsper, E.J., Eynon, R.: Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS). Inf. Commun. Soc. 19(6), 804–823 (2016)
Wedeen, L.: Ethnography as interpretive enterprise. In: Schatz, E. (ed.) political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2009)
Danmarks Statistik 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Profile of Sites and Participants
The demographical profiles of the municipalities serve to show how typical they are for the Danish context in general, as well as to outline any specific issues that may affect the contact patterns of the authorities involved – specifically: a high unemployment rate, many young or elderly people, many with low education levels.
Demographical data on the municipalities involved show that apart from Copenhagen (on several parameters), and Ballerup – on public housing, the municipalities involved are fairly representative of Danish municipalities in general, on the selected paramters (all data from Danish Statistical Databank for 2013, unless otherwise stated) (Table 8).
A1.2 Demographical Profile of Participants
All age groups are represented in the data, some more than others. Figure 1 shows the differences between the age-profile of the participants (whose age was registered) across all sites and the age profile of the general Danish populationFootnote 2.
The age of the participants reflects the age of the Danish population [48] a deviation of 6% or less or all age groups, except for the age-group 20–24 which has a 10% overrepresentation and the age-group 65–69 with a 9% overrepresentation. This was to be expected as younger citizens and citizens around the age of retirement typically have more frequent interactions with authorities are more often in situations they have not been in before, which tends to lead to a greater need for face-to-face interaction [42] The level of education also represents the Danish population with a deviation of less than 5% except for those with only a high-school education.
Figure 2 shows the education profile of all participants of 20 years or over compared to the total Danish population (also 20+).
The overrepresentation of high-school graduates can be explained by the overrepresentation of the younger age-group where many are still studying. The underrepresentation of citizens with a medium to longer education could be explained in part by the overrepresentation of elderly people – a group in which fewer people got a longer education than in the younger groups. But it may also be because the need and indeed eligibility for citizen services (especially the various benefits) is smaller among the well-educated, or because they have less need for face-to-face contact, being more able to take care of themselves through other channels.
For the variation of the perspectives represented in the study, this data would imply that we may lack perspectives from well-educated citizens, who may have different experiences with and find different meanings in digitisation and centralisation than citizens with less education. At the same time, this group of citizens could arguably be expected to have an easier time compensating for lack of domain-skills and thus less need of contextualization and framing.
Participants use of the internet, of home banking and their experience with doing tax online (representing a “service” all adults need to interact with at least once a year) – deviated 5% or less from that of the general population [48] (Fig. 3).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Skaarup, S. (2020). The Role of Domain-Skills in Bureaucratic Service Encounters. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57598-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57599-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)