Skip to main content

Policy-Making in a Bounded Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Referendums Challenge European Democracy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 478 Accesses

Abstract

The British doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is set in a closed political system. A general election gives the government of the day the power to take whatever decision it wants as long as it is supported by the majority party in Parliament. The rhetoric of prime ministers from Churchill to Blair saw foreign policy as a process in which the British government could get what it wanted by drawing on the country’s traditional standing and superior diplomatic skills to ‘punch above its weight’ in dealing with other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • BMG. 2016. Electoral Commission Post-EU Referendum Survey. BMG, 3,5533 Respondents, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., and P. Goldsmith. 2017. How to Lose a Referendum. London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47: 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkup, J. 2019. The Truth About David Cameron and “the Mad, Swivel-Eyed Loons”. The Spectator, 17 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B. 2019. How the EU27 Came to Be. Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (Annual Review): 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., and J. Blackburn. 2019. Brussels Team Ridicules No. 10’s “Insane” Strategy. The Times, 9 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, K. 2018. A Short History of Brexit: From Brentry to Backstop. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, I. 2019. 9 Lessons in Brexit. London: Short Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C.R. 1960. The Relation of Socialist Principles to British Labour Foreign Policy, 1945–1951. DPhil, Faculty of Social Studies, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldon, A. 2019. May at 10. London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, T. 2016. All Out War: The Full Story of Brexit. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, T. 2017. Fall Out: A Year of Political Mayhem. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uberoi, E. 2016. European Union Referendum 2016. House of Commons Briefing Paper 7639, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Middelaar, L. 2019. Alarums and Excursions: Improvising Politics on the European Stage. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, N. 2019. Time Line EU. House of Commons Briefing Paper 7639, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. 2013. Now New Claims Suggest Cameron Used “Swivel-Eyed Loons” Jibe. Daily Mail, 19 May.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rose, R. (2020). Policy-Making in a Bounded Democracy. In: How Referendums Challenge European Democracy . Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44117-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics