Skip to main content

Acute Appendicitis in Obese Patients

  • Chapter
Book cover Emergency Surgery in Obese Patients

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

Abstract

Considering that obesity is a widespread condition in Western countries, general surgeons will have to operate an ever-increasing number of acute appendicitis cases in both adult and pediatric obese patients. Obesity introduces additional diagnostic issues, so in overweight patients it is often necessary to use instrumental diagnostics to confirm the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy represents the surgical technique of choice, with clear advantages compared to traditional surgery in terms of better postoperative outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:743–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wei PL, Chen CS, Keller JJ, Lin HC. Monthly variation in acute appendicitis incidence: a 10-year nationwide population-based study. J Surg Res. 2012;178:670–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petroianu A, Oliveira-Neto JE, Alberti LR. Comparative incidence of acute appendicitis in a mixed population, related to skin color. Arq Gastroenterol. 2004;41:24–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanco FC, Sandler AD, Nadler EP. Increased incidence of perforated appendicitis in children with obesity. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51:928–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Istat. Anni 2000–2016—Il diabete in Italia (20 luglio 2017). https://www.istat.it/it/files//2017/07/REPORT_DIABETE.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.

  7. Sivrikoz E, Karamanos E, Beale E, et al. The effect of diabetes on outcomes following emergency appendectomy in patients without comorbidities: a propensity score-matched analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Am J Surg. 2015;209:206–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dasari BVM, Baker J, Markar S, Gardiner K. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in obese is associated with improvements in clinical outcome: systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015;13:250–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES Consensus Development Conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4668–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teo AT, Lefter LP, Zarrouk AJ, Merrett ND. Institutional review of patients presenting with suspected appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:420–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kollár D, McCartan DP, Bourke M, et al. Predicting acute appendicitis? A comparison of the Alvarado score, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score and clinical assessment. World J Surg. 2015;39:104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker L, Nazarian LN, Gingold EL, et al. Cost and radiation savings of partial substitution of ultrasound for CT in appendicitis evaluation: a national projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:124–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang ST, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW. Three-step sequential positioning algorithm during sonographic evaluation for appendicitis increases appendiceal visualization rate and reduces CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:1006–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1596–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson SW, Rhea JT, Milch HN, et al. Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT. Emerg Radiol. 2010;17:445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barger RL Jr, Nandalur KR. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of appendicitis in adults: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bliss LA, Yang CJ, Kent TS, et al. Appendicitis in the modern era: universal problem and variable treatment. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1897–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitz RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Am J Med Sci. 1886;92:321–46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McBurney C IV. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e2156. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;313:2340–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;18:11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2010;145:886–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. United Kingdom National Surgical Research Collaborative, Bhangu A, Singh P, Panagiotopoulou I, et al. Safety of short, in-hospital delays before surgery for acute appendicitis: multicentre cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259:894–903.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Busch M, Gutzwiller FS, Aellig S, et al. In-hospital delay increases the risk of perforation in adults with appendicitis. World J Surg. 2011;35:1626–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng Y, Xiong X, Lu J, et al. Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD011670. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011670.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Antoniou SA, Morales-Conde S, Antoniou GA, et al; Bonham Group. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia. 2016;20:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jaschinski T, Mosch CG, Eikermann M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(11):CD001546. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.

  30. Ukai T, Shikata S, Takeda H, et al. Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg. 2008;196:218–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang G, Jiang Z, Zhao K, et al. Immunologic response after laparoscopic colon cancer operation within an enhanced recovery program. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1379–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schietroma M, Piccione F, Carlei F, et al. Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment. Am Surg. 2012;78:582–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roscio F, Combi F, Scandroglio I. Emergency laparoscopic surgery in high-risk patients. Global J Surg. 2014;2:49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mason RJ, Moazzez A, Moroney JR, Katkhouda N. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in obese patients: outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Clarke T, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1276–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg. 2011;202:733–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Woodham BL, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2566–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ciarrocchi A, Amicucci G. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in obese patients: a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10:4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37:588–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Frutos D, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, et al. Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single incision appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2013;257:413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, et al. Metaanalysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2014;207:613–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Buckley FP III, Vassaur HE, Jupiter DC, et al. Influencing factors for port-site hernias after single-incision laparoscopy. Hernia. 2016;20:729–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Roscio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roscio, F., Clerici, F., Armiraglio, L., Scandroglio, I. (2020). Acute Appendicitis in Obese Patients. In: Foschi, D., Navarra, G. (eds) Emergency Surgery in Obese Patients. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17305-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17305-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17304-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17305-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics