Skip to main content

Spacecraft Accident Investigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Clinical Medicine for Space Flight

Abstract

The process of investigating spacecraft accidents rests on the lessons of more than 60 years of aircraft crash investigation. There was little need for such skills in the early years of US spaceflight. This changed dramatically in 1986 with the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger and was perpetuated by the loss of Space Shuttle Columbia in 2003. There have been other fatal accidents involving spacecraft and many near misses. With plans that include continued manning of the International Space Station (ISS); multiple new vehicles; exploration of the moon, asteroids, and Mars; and a vigorous civilian presence in space, it is certain that there will be a need for such investigations in the future. Medical investigators, human factors specialists, and flight surgeons will have essential roles. Their activities will concern human factors, physiology, and the assessment of human survivability – all aimed at preventing future injury and death. The necessary “forensic analysis” will be difficult, both emotionally and physically, and will not always be appreciated, supported, or understood by those uninvolved with the process. Outcome conclusions must be “evidence based” and oriented toward gaining information that will contribute to answering specific questions relevant to future practices and designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veronneau S, Ricaurte E. Aircraft accidents: investigation and prevention. In: Davis J, et al., editors. Fundamentals of aerospace medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2008. p. 552–623.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shayler D. Disasters and accidents in manned. London: Springer-Praxis; 2000. p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report. 2003. Washington, DC: NASA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report: NASA/SP-2008-565. 2008, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banks RD, Brinkley J, Allnutt RA, Harding RM. Human response to acceleration. In: Davis J, editor. Fundamentals of aerospace medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2008. p. 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shafer DM, Xenofos AV. Legal analysis and issues from recovery and investigation of the Columbia accident. In: Stepaniuk PC, Lane HW, editors. Loss of signal: lessons learned from the STS-107 Columbia space shuttle; 2014. p. 114–22, NASA/SP-2014-616.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Report of Apollo 13 Review Board. 1970, NASA. p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bagian JP. Columbia accident investigation board medical operations and crew survivability working group. In: Stepaniuk PC, Lane HW, editors. Loss of signal: aeromedical lessons learned from the STS-107 Columbia space shuttle mishap; 2014. p. 76–85, NASA/SP-2014-616.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bagian JP, White DJ. Appendix G.12 crew survivability working group. In: Columbia accident investigation board report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mallak C. Mishap response and lessons learned: the role of the Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. In: Stepaniuk PC, Lane HW, editors. Loss of signal: aeromedical lessons learned from the STS-107 Columbia space shuttle mishap; 2014. p. 41–8, NASA/SP-2014-616.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ. Virtopsy, minimally invasive, image guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics. 2006;26:1305–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DiMaio VJ, DiMaio D. Forensic pathology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adelson L. The pathology of homicide, vol. 976. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knight B. Simpson’s forensic medicine. 11th ed. London: Arnold; 1993. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merlin P, Bendrick G, Holland D. Breaking the mishap chain. NASA aeronautics book. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2011. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buckey J. Space physiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clark J, Bacal K. Neurologic concerns. In: Barratt M, Pool S, editors. Principles of clinical medicine for space flight. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McMeekin R. Patterns of injuries in fatal aircraft accidents. In: Aerospace pathology. Chicago: College of American Pathologists Foundation; 1973. p. 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eiband MA. Human tolerance to rapidly applied accelerations: a summary of literature: NASA; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Althoff B. Fracture of the odontoid process: an experimental and clinical study. In: ACTA Orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplement. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1979. p. 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tile M. Fracture of the pelvis and acetabulum. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading

  1. Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report. 2003. Washington, DC: NASA.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shayler D. Disasters and accidents in manned spaceflights: Springer-Praxis; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banks RD, Brinkley J, Allnutt RA, Harding RM. In: Davis J, editor. Human response to acceleration, in fundamentals of aerospace medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2008. p. 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Merlin P, Bendrick G, Holland D. Breaking the mishap chain. NASA aeronautics book, vol. 227. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Veronneau S, Ricaurte E. Aircraft accidents: investigation and prevention. In: Davis J, et al., editors. Fundamentals of aerospace medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2008. p. 552–623.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loss of Signal: Aeromedical Lessons Learned from the STS-107 Columbia Space Shuttle Mishap, 2014, NASA. NASA/SP-2014-616.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the valuable assistance of Mr. Raymond Heineman, Dr. Gary Gray, and Dr. Dean Olson. Mr. Chuck Whitehead and Mr. John Martini of Biodynamic Research Corporation prepared the illustrations. The scanned crash scene was produced and made available for us by Design Research Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Banks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Banks, R., Auñón, S.M., Harding, R., Mumbower, A. (2019). Spacecraft Accident Investigation. In: Barratt, M., Baker, E., Pool, S. (eds) Principles of Clinical Medicine for Space Flight. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9889-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9889-0_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9887-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9889-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics