Skip to main content

in Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison and IVIVR

Carbamazepine Case

  • Chapter
Book cover In Vitro-in Vivo Correlations

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 423))

Abstract

USP1 describes the in-vivo/in-vitro correlation as the “establishment of a rational relationship between a biological property, or a parameter derived from a biological property produced by a dosage form and a physicochemical property or characteristic of the same dosage form”. In relation to a formulation, the most commonly used biological properties are the pharmacokinetic parameters such as Cmax or AUC, obtained following the administration of the dosage form while the physicochemical property is the dosage form’s in-vitro dissolution performance such as percent of drug released under a given set of conditions. The relationship between these two biological and physicochemical properties, is then expressed quantitatively. For rapidly dissolving (less than 15 minutes) immediate release formulations, an in-vitro characterization could be made using a single dissolution point. This however cannot be said for immediate release formulations consisting either low solubility actives or slowly dissolving matrix or for modified release formulations. In these cases, a dissolution profile and not a single dissolution specification point, is more appropriate. If an adequate in-vitro/in-vivo relationship is established using a suitable technique such as statistical moments or deconvolution, an insight into the pharmacokinetics could be obtained from the formulation’s in-vitro dissolution performance. More importantly, in case of an alteration in the dissolution profile characteristics, it allows one to raise a flag about the possible alteration in the in-vivo performance and pharmacokinetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. U.S. Pharmacopeia 23 and National Formulary 18, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.C. Meyer et al. The bioequivalence of carbamazepine tablets with a history of clinical failures. Pharmaceutical Research 9(12): 1612–1616 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guidance for Industry. Immediate release solid oral dosage forms; Scale-up and post-approval changes. FDA/CDER, November 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guidance for Industry. Extended release solid oral dosage forms; Scale-up and post-approval changes. FDA/CDER, July 1996

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.W. Moore and H.H. Flanner. Mathematical Comparison of Dissolution Profiles Pharmaceutical Technology 20(6): 64–74 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Resigno. Bioequvalence Pharmaceutical Research 9/7: 925–928 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Tsong, T. Hammerstrom, P. Sathe and V.P. Shah. Statistical assessment of mean differences between two dissolution data sets. Drug Information Journal 30(4): 1105–1112 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fred M. Hoppe. ed., Multiple Comparisons, Selection and Applications in Biometry, Marcel Dekker Inc., New-York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Tsong, P. Sathe and V.P. Shah, American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Biopharmaceutical Section (in print) 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Akaike. IEEE Trans.Automat.Contr. 19: 716–723 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Langenbucher. Linearization of dissolution rate curves by Weibull distribution. J.Pharm.Pharmac, 24: 979–981 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.M. Sathe, Y. Tsong and V.P. Shah. in-vitro dissolution profile comparison: statistics and analysis; model dependent approach. Pharmaceutical Research, 13(12): 1798–1802 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R.A. Johnson and D.W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Analysis, Prentice-Hall Inc, New Jersey, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kayali. Bioequivalency evaluation by comparison of in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption using reference equations. Eur. J. Drug Met. and Pharmacok. 3: 271–277 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sathe, P., Tsong, Y., Shah, V.P. (1997). in Vitro Dissolution Profile Comparison and IVIVR. In: Young, D., Devane, J.G., Butler, J. (eds) In Vitro-in Vivo Correlations. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 423. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6036-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6036-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-6038-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-6036-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics