Skip to main content

Full-Length Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing with FLASH-seq

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2584))

Abstract

The single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) field has evolved tremendously since the first paper was published back in 2009 (Tang et al. Nat Methods 6:377–382, 2009). While the first methods analyzed just a handful of cells, the throughput and performance rapidly increased over a very short time span. However, it was not until the introduction of emulsion droplets methods, such as the well-known kits commercialized by 10x Genomics, that the robust and reproducible analysis of thousands of cells became feasible (Zheng et al Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 8:14049, 2017). Despite generating data at a speed and a cost per cell that remains unmatched for full-length protocols like Smart-seq (Hagemann-Jensen et al Single-cell RNA counting at allele and isoform resolution using Smart-seq3. Nat Biotechnol 38:708–714, 2020; Picelli et al Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat Methods 10:1096–1098, 2013), scRNA-seq in droplets still comes with the drawback of addressing only the terminal portion of the transcripts, thus lacking the required sensitivity for comprehensively analyzing the entire transcriptome.

Building upon the existing Smart-seq2/3 workflows (Hagemann-Jensen et al Single-cell RNA counting at allele and isoform resolution using Smart-seq3. Nat Biotechnol 38:708–714, 2020; Picelli et al Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat Methods 10:1096–1098, 2013), we developed FLASH-seq (FS), a new full-length scRNA-seq method capable of detecting a significantly higher number of genes than previous versions, requiring limited hands-on time and with a great potential for customization (Hahaut et al. Lightning Fast and Highly Sensitive Full-Length Single-cell sequencing using FLASH-Seq. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.07.14.452217. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.452217, 2021). Here, we present three variants of the FS protocol.

Standard FLASH-seq (FS), which builds upon Smart-seq2 developed in the past, is non-stranded and does not use unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) but still remains the easiest method to measure gene expression in a cell population.

FLASH-seq low-amplification (FS-LA) represents the fastest method, which generates sequencing-ready libraries in 4.5 h, without sacrificing performance.

FLASH-seq with UMIs (FS-UMI) builds upon the same principle as Smart-seq3 and introduces UMIs for molecule counting and isoform reconstruction. The newly designed template-switching oligonucleotide (TSO) contains a 5-bp spacer, which allows the generation of high-quality data while minimizing the amount of strand-invasion artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Tang F et al (2009) mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat Methods 6:377–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng GXY et al (2017) Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 8:14049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagemann-Jensen M et al (2020) Single-cell RNA counting at allele and isoform resolution using Smart-seq3. Nat Biotechnol 38:708–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Picelli S et al (2013) Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat Methods 10:1096–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hahaut V, Pavlinic D, Cowan C, Picelli S (2021) Lightning Fast and Highly Sensitive Full-Length Single-cell sequencing using FLASH-Seq. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.07.14.452217. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.452217

  6. Deng Q, Ramsköld D, Reinius B, Sandberg R (2014) Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells. Science 343:193–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Petropoulos S et al (2016) Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals lineage and X chromosome dynamics in human preimplantation embryos. Cell 165:1012–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinius B et al (2016) Analysis of allelic expression patterns in clonal somatic cells by single-cell RNA-seq. Nat Genet 48:1430–1435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu YY, Machleder EM, Chenchik A, Li R, Siebert PD (2001) Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART™ approach for full-length cDNA library construction. BioTechniques 30:892–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Picelli S et al (2014) Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Res 24:2033–2040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen W, Gardeux V, Meireles-Filho A, Deplancke B (2017) Profiling of single-cell transcriptomes. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol 7:145–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dobin A et al (2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29:15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W (2014) featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bushnell B BBMap – sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li H et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C (2017) Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods 14:417–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L (2016) Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol 34:525–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2015) HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12:357–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hao Y et al (2021) Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184:3573–3587.e29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ (2018) SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol 19:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lun ATL, McCarthy DJ, Marioni JC (2016) A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of singlecell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor. F1000 Res 5:1–71

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hagemann-Jensen M, Ziegenhain C, Sandberg R (2021) Scalable full-transcript coverage single cell RNA sequencing with Smart-seq3xpress. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.07.10.451889, https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.10.451889

  24. Tang DTP et al (2013) Suppression of artifacts and barcode bias in high-throughput transcriptome analyses utilizing template switching. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hochgerner H et al (2017) STRT-seq-2i: dual-index 5′ single cell and nucleus RNA-seq on an addressable microwell array. Sci Rep 7:16327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith T, Heger A, Sudbery I (2016) UMI-tools: modelling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/051755 https://doi.org/10.1101/051755

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Picelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Hahaut, V., Picelli, S. (2023). Full-Length Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing with FLASH-seq. In: Calogero, R.A., Benes, V. (eds) Single Cell Transcriptomics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2584. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2756-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2756-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2755-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2756-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics