Skip to main content

NEO Personality Inventory

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

Synonyms

Revised NEO personality inventory

Description

The Revised NEO Personality Inventory, or NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992), is the second revision of a psychological measure of personality, the Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Personality Inventory, based on the Five-Factor Model of Personality (FFM) (Digman, 1990). The FFM postulates five basic dimensions of personality that summarize a person’s emotional, interpersonal, motivational, attitudinal, and experiential styles. The five dimensions – neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness – are the five factors of the NEO-PI-R. There are six facets within each factor that further distinguish aspects of each domain. There are eight questions representing each of the 30 facets. Finally, three items assess validity of the respondent’s answers.

The manual states that the NEO-PI-R is appropriate for people ages 17 years and older but that it is not to be used with individuals who have disorders that...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Aben, I., Denollet, J., Lousberg, R., Verhey, F., Wojciechowski, F., & Honig, A. (2002). Personality and vulnerability to depression in stroke patients: A 1-year prospective follow-up study. Stroke, 33, 2391–2395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aluja, A., Garcia, L. F., Cuevas, L., & Garcia, O. (2007). The MCMI-III Personality Disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: A comparative study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 58–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayotte, B. J., Potter, G. G., Williams, H. T., Steffens, D. C., & Bosworth, H. B. (2009). The moderating role of personality factors in the relationship between depression and neuropsychological functioning among older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 1010–1019.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. A., Herbst, J. H., Stoller, K. B., King, V. L., Kidorf, M. S., Costa, P. T., et al. (2001). Short-term stability of NEO-PI-R personality trait scores in opioid-dependent outpatients. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 255–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenop, K. R., Almeida, O. P., Hankey, G. J., van Bockxmeer, F., & Lautenschlager, N. T. (2009). Premorbid personality traits are associated with post-stroke behavioral and psychological symptoms: A three-month follow-up study in Perth, Western Australia. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 1063–1071.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, J. E., Putnam, S. H., & Stone, C. (1998). Stability of normal personality traits after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, 1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lannoo, E., DeDeyne, C., Colardyn, F., DeSoete, G., & Jannes, C. (1997). Personality change following head injury: Assessment with the NEO Five Factor Inventory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 43, 505–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loughead, J., Ford, S., Holda, B., & Zillmer, E. (1999). The D2 Test of Attention and the Tower of London-Drexel correlate with the NEO-PI-R: Abstracts from the 18th Annual Meeting. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Joint factors in self-reports and ratings: Neuroticism, extraversion and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J. P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five factor model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasco, B. J., Gfeller, J. D., & Elder, K. A. (2007). The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: A comparison with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 276–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, S. W., Christiansen, N. D., Wagner, S. H., & McNulty, J. L. (2003). On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: Evidence of the incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 15, 311–325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranseen, J. D., Campbell, D. A., & Baer, R. A. (1998). NEO-PI-R profiles of adults with attention deficit disorder. Assessment, 5, 19–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. K., & Clark, L. A. (2001). Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domain and facets of the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 69, 199–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, B. K., Malec, J. F., Brown, A. W., & Moessner, A. M. (2006). Personality and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51, 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, S. B., Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., Lee-Baggley, D. L., & Hall, P. A. (2007). Trait perfectionism and perfectionistic self-presentation in personality pathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 477–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storor, D. L., & Byrne, G. J. A. (2006). Pre-morbid personality and depression following stroke. International Psychogeriatrics, 18, 457–469.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., Jome, L. M., Haase, R. F., & Bruch, M. A. (2006). The role of personality and career decision-making self-efficacy in the career choice commitment of college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 312–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. S., & Schinka, J. A. (2001). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Additional evidence for reliability and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 412–420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kurylo, M., Stevenson, J. (2011). NEO Personality Inventory. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_2000

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_2000

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79947-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79948-3

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics