Abstract
Defining “Biodiversity” can be a challenge because the term functions in two arenas—scientific biology and conservation policy. First, it will be noted that there are arguments that apparently show that the term is not rigorously definable in a way that makes biodiversity an additive quantity; the consequences of this undefinability for policy will be discussed. Second, it will be argued that it is more important to develop a policy-relevant definition, a definition that reflects social value as well as scientific soundness in characterizing biodiversity, and which functions to allow communication about what to do. What is important is to have a definition that encourages shared actions and allows for the improvement of our linguistic tools. Perhaps it will be necessary to develop the concept of “biodiversity” as a scientific concept, while pairing it with a more readily understandable phrase, such as “the web of life” for use in public discussions.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. A facsimile of the first edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays in contemporary thought. New York: Henry Holt.
Norton, B. G. (1987). Why preserve natural variety? Studies in moral, political, and legal philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Norton, B. G. (1991.) Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Norton, B. G., & A. Steinemann. (2003). Environmental values and adaptive management. In B. G. Norton (Ed.), Searching for sustainability: interdisciplinary essays on the philosophy of conservation biology (pp. 514–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sarkar, S. (2005). Biodiversity and environmental philosophy: an introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, C. (1987). Earth and other ethics: the case for moral pluralism. New York: Harper and Row.
Takacs, D. (1996). The idea of biodiversity: philosophies of paradise. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Whittaker, R. H. (1960). Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30, 279–338.
Wood, P. M. (1997). Biodiversity as the source of biological resources: a new look at biodiversity values. Environmental Values, 6, 251–68.
Wood, P. M. (2000). Biodiversity and democracy: rethinking society and nature. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norton, B.G. (2008). Toward a Policy-Relevant Definition of Biodiversity. In: Askins, R.A., Dreyer, G.D., Visgilio, G.R., Whitelaw, D.M. (eds) Saving Biological Diversity. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09565-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09565-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09566-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09565-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)